World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stefan Woltran

Stefan Woltran

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
6845
World Ranking
8446
National Ranking
75

Stefan Woltran publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Woltran sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 316 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stefan Woltran D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Woltran sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan Woltran is affiliated with TU Wien in Austria and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with a primary focus on artificial intelligence. Their research portfolio encompasses a total of 154 publications in computer science, including 125 specifically related to artificial intelligence.

Woltran's work covers several subfields within computer science, such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems
  • Sociology and Political Science

The main topics addressed in Woltran's research include:

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Logic, Programming, and Type Systems
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Software Engineering Research

The recent scientific papers authored by or involving Woltran illustrate a focus on argumentation frameworks, logic programming, and computational complexity. Selected papers feature:

  • Investigating subclasses of abstract dialectical frameworks (2020) published in Argument & Computation
  • Structural Decompositions of Epistemic Logic Programs (2020) published in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • The Impact of Treewidth on Grounding and Solving of Answer Set Programs (2020) published in Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  • Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view (2020) published in Artificial Intelligence
  • Tractable Abstract Argumentation via Backdoor-Treewidth (2022) published in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Woltran frequently publishes in reputable venues including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  • Theory and Practice of Logic Programming

The scientist has collaborated regularly with a group of coauthors, reflecting a network of research partnerships. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Wolfgang Dvořák
  • Markus Hecher
  • Anna Rapberger
  • Michael Morak
  • Matthias König

Best Publications

  • Abstract dialectical frameworks

    Gerhard Brewka;Stefan Woltran

  • Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation

    Wolfgang Dvořák;Matti Järvisalo;Johannes Peter Wallner;Stefan Woltran

  • Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation

    Paul E. Dunne;Wolfgang Dvořák;Thomas Linsbichler;Stefan Woltran

  • Answer-set programming encodings for argumentation frameworks

    Uwe Egly;Sarah Alice Gaggl;Stefan Woltran

  • Abstract dialectical frameworks revisited

    Gerhard Brewka;Stefan Ellmauthaler;Hannes Strass;Johannes Peter Wallner

  • Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation - A survey

    Günther Charwat;Wolfgang Dvořák;Sarah A. Gaggl;Johannes P. Wallner

  • Solving Advanced Reasoning Tasks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas

    Uwe Egly;Thomas Eiter;Hans Tompits;Stefan Woltran

  • Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks

    Emilia Oikarinen;Stefan Woltran

  • ASPARTIX: Implementing Argumentation Frameworks Using Answer-Set Programming

    Uwe Egly;Sarah Alice Gaggl;Stefan Woltran

  • An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation

    Martin Diller;Adrian Haret;Thomas Linsbichler;Stefan Rümmele

  • Simplifying Logic Programs Under Uniform and Strong Equivalence

    Thomas Eiter;Michael Fink;Hans Tompits;Stefan Woltran

  • Semantical characterizations and complexity of equivalences in answer set programming

    Thomas Eiter;Michael Fink;Stefan Woltran

  • Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks

    Wolfgang Dvořák;Stefan Woltran

  • Encodings for Equilibrium Logic and Logic Programs with Nested Expressions

    David Pearce;Hans Tompits;Stefan Woltran

  • The Added Value of Argumentation

    Sanjay Modgil;Francesca Toni;Floris Bex;Ivan Bratko

  • Modularity aspects of disjunctive stable models

    Tomi Janhunen;Emilia Oikarinen;Hans Tompits;Stefan Woltran

  • On solution correspondences in answer-set programming

    Thomas Eiter;Hans Tompits;Stefan Woltran

  • Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for abstract argumentation

    Wolfgang Dvořák;Reinhard Pichler;Stefan Woltran

  • Special issue on answer set programming

    Marcello Balduccini;Stefan Woltran

  • Debugging ASP programs by means of ASP

    Martin Brain;Martin Gebser;Jorg Puhrer;Torsten Schaub

  • Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2012

    B. Verheij;S. Szeider;S. Woltran

Frequent Co-Authors

Torsten Schaub
Torsten Schaub University of Potsdam
Miroslaw Truszczynski
Miroslaw Truszczynski University of Kentucky
Wolfgang Faber
Wolfgang Faber University of Klagenfurt
Gerhard Brewka
Gerhard Brewka Leipzig University
Martin Gebser
Martin Gebser University of Klagenfurt
Paul E. Dunne
Paul E. Dunne University of Liverpool
Paolo Torroni
Paolo Torroni University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Computer Science opens up diverse pathways for advancing your career. As the tech industry continues to evolve, understanding the best majors for the future can help ensure your field of study remains in high demand. Many students also seek the flexibility of online graduate degrees, with options such as the easiest online masters programs that balance academic value with manageable workloads.

Affordability is another crucial factor. Numerous universities now offer the most affordable online phd programs, making advanced study accessible without the burden of excessive debt. For those interested in leadership roles within education or tech-related fields, pursuing one of the cheapest edd programs online can be an efficient way to boost your credentials.

As you consider your academic journey and professional goals, reviewing these online degree options can help you make informed decisions and navigate your career path effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Woltran

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles