World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gerhard Brewka

Gerhard Brewka

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
8619
World Ranking
9166
National Ranking
454

Gerhard Brewka publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerhard Brewka sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gerhard Brewka D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerhard Brewka sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gerhard Brewka is affiliated with Leipzig University in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on areas within computer science, with a specialization in artificial intelligence.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science

The subfields of study encompass:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics

The primary research topics covered in their work are:

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Advanced Algebra and Logic
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Gerhard Brewka has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • "A general framework for preferences in answer set programming", 2023, Artificial Intelligence
  • "Revisiting the Foundations of Abstract Argumentation - Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility and Weak Defense", 2020, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Shedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation: Modularization and weak admissibility", 2022, Artificial Intelligence
  • "Handling and measuring inconsistency in non-monotonic logics", 2020, Artificial Intelligence

Frequent co-authors with whom Brewka has collaborated are:

  • Markus Ulbricht
  • Ringo Baumann
  • Matthias Thimm
  • James P. Delgrande
  • Javier Romero

Their publications have appeared predominantly in the following venues:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Best Publications

  • Answer set programming at a glance

    Gerhard Brewka;Thomas Eiter;Mirosław Truszczyński

  • Preferred subtheories: an extended logical framework for default reasoning

    Gerhard Brewka

  • Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Logical Foundations of Commonsense

    Gerhard Brewka

  • Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs

    Gerhard Brewka;Thomas Eiter

  • Nonmonotonic Reasoning: An Overview

    Gerhard Brewka;Jurgen Dix;Kurt Konolige

  • Cumulative default logic: in defense of nonmonotonic inference rules

    Gerhard Brewka

  • Abstract dialectical frameworks

    Gerhard Brewka;Stefan Woltran

  • Equilibria in heterogeneous nonmonotonic multi-context systems

    Gerhard Brewka;Thomas Eiter

  • Reasoning about priorities in default logic

    Gerhard Brewka

  • Expanding Argumentation Frameworks: Enforcing and Monotonicity Results

    Ringo Baumann;Gerhard Brewka

  • Abstract dialectical frameworks revisited

    Gerhard Brewka;Stefan Ellmauthaler;Hannes Strass;Johannes Peter Wallner

  • Adding Priorities and Specificity to Default Logic

    Gerhard Brewka

  • Logic programming with ordered disjunction

    Gerhard Brewka

  • Answer set optimization

    Gerhard Brewka;Ilkka Niemela;Miroslaw Truszczynski

  • Qualitative choice logic

    Gerhard Brewka;Salem Benferhat;Daniel Le Berre

  • Well-founded semantics for extended logic programs with dynamic preferences

    Gerhard Brewka

  • Dynamic Argument Systems: A Formal Model of Argumentation Processes Based on Situation Calculus

    Gerhard Brewka

  • How to Do Things with Worlds: on Formalizing Actions and Plans

    Gerhard Brewka;Joachim Hertzberg

  • Prioritizing Default Logic

    Gerhard Brewka;Thomas Eiter

  • asprin : customizing answer set preferences without a headache

    Gerhard Brewka;James Delgrande;Javier Romero;Torsten Schaub

Frequent Co-Authors

Miroslaw Truszczynski
Miroslaw Truszczynski University of Kentucky
Ilkka Niemelä
Ilkka Niemelä Aalto University
Franz Baader
Franz Baader TU Dresden
Torsten Schaub
Torsten Schaub University of Potsdam
Bernhard Nebel
Bernhard Nebel University of Freiburg
Chitta Baral
Chitta Baral Arizona State University
Joachim Hertzberg
Joachim Hertzberg Osnabrück University
Jérôme Lang
Jérôme Lang Paris Dauphine University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering studying Computer Science in the USA, there are a variety of related online degrees and career pathways to explore. Flexible learning options now make it easy to pursue technology-focused programs at your own pace.

For those looking to start quickly, you might explore what is the easiest associate's degree to get. Associate degrees can open doors to entry-level IT or support roles, serving as a stepping stone for further study or direct entry into the workforce.

If you’re interested in education or leadership within the tech sector, consider an advanced degree like the ed.d educational leadership. This pathway is ideal for those aiming for roles in academia or organizational leadership in technology.

Many students also benefit from researching popular online colleges, as choosing an accredited institution ensures quality education and better career prospects.

For those drawn to creative tech careers, pursuing a masters in game design online can fast-track your development skills and open opportunities in the gaming industry.

Best Scientists Citing Gerhard Brewka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles