World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
88
Citations
27551
World Ranking
647
National Ranking
27

John W. Pomeroy publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Pomeroy sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 455 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John W. Pomeroy D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Pomeroy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science
  • 2013 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

John W. Pomeroy is a researcher affiliated with the University of Saskatchewan in Canada. Their work primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a strong focus on atmospheric science and water-related studies within these disciplines.

Their research has contributed extensively to subfields including Atmospheric Science, Water Science and Technology, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. They have addressed a range of topics such as cryospheric studies and observations, hydrology and watershed management, climate change and permafrost, meteorological phenomena and simulations, climate variability and models, landslides and related hazards, and plant water relations and carbon dynamics.

John W. Pomeroy has published frequently in several scientific venues, with the highest number of papers appearing in the Journal of Hydrology. Other regularly chosen journals include Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Hydrological Processes, Water Resources Research, and Federated Research Data Repository.

Co-authorship has been a significant aspect of their scholarly work. Frequent collaborators include Kevin Shook, H. S. Wheater, Alain Pietroniro, Xing Fang, and Warren Helgason.

Selected recent papers with year of publication and venues include:

  • "Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison", 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Improving sub-canopy snow depth mapping with unmanned aerial vehicles: lidar versus structure-from-motion techniques", 2020, The Cryosphere
  • "The cold regions hydrological modelling platform for hydrological diagnosis and prediction based on process understanding", 2022, Journal of Hydrology
  • "Freeze-Thaw Changes of Seasonally Frozen Ground on the Tibetan Plateau from 1960 to 2014", 2020, Journal of Climate
  • "The Canadian Hydrological Model (CHM) v1.0: a multi-scale, multi-extent, variable-complexity hydrological model - design and overview", 2020, Geoscientific Model Development

John W. Pomeroy has received recognition in the form of fellowships, including being named Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 2018 and Fellow of the American Geophysical Union in 2013.

Best Publications

  • IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences

    M. Sivapalan;K. Takeuchi;S. W. Franks;V. K. Gupta

  • A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review

    M. Hrachowitz;H. H. G. Savenije;G. Blöschl;J. J. Mcdonnell

  • Measurements and modelling of snow interception in the boreal forest

    N. R. Hedstrom;J. W. Pomeroy

  • The cold regions hydrological model: a platform for basing process representation and model structure on physical evidence

    J. W. Pomeroy;D. M. Gray;T. Brown;N. R. Hedstrom

  • Snowcover Accumulation, Relocation, and Management

    Don Cline;J. W. Pomeroy;D. M. Gray

  • Evaluation of forest snow processes models (SnowMIP2)

    Nick Rutter;Richard Essery;John Pomeroy;Nuria Altimir

  • Saltation of snow

    J. W. Pomeroy;D. M. Gray

  • An evaluation of snow accumulation and ablation processes for land surface modelling

    J. W. Pomeroy;D. M. Gray;K. R. Shook;B. Toth

  • The Prairie Blowing Snow Model: characteristics, validation, operation

    J.W. Pomeroy;D.M. Gray;P.G. Landine

  • Estimates of Threshold Wind Speeds for Snow Transport Using Meteorological Data.

    Long Li;John W. Pomeroy

  • Coupled Modelling of Forest Snow Interception and Sublimation

    J. W. Pomeroy;J. Parviainen;N. Hedstrom;N. Hedstrom;D. M. Gray

  • Prediction of seasonal snow accumulation in cold climate forests

    J. W. Pomeroy;D. M. Gray;N. R. Hedstrom;J. R. Janowicz

  • APPLICATION OF A DISTRIBUTED BLOWING SNOW MODEL TO THE ARCTIC

    J. W. Pomeroy;P. Marsh;D. M. Gray

  • SNOWMIP2: an evaluation of forest snow process simulations.

    Richard Essery;Nick Rutter;John Pomeroy;Robert Baxter

  • Solar radiation transmission through conifer canopies

    J.P. Hardy;R. Melloh;G. Koenig;D. Marks

  • Snow ecology : an interdisciplinary examination of snow-covered ecosystems

    G. Peter Kershaw;H. G. Jones;J. W. Pomeroy;D. A. Walker

  • Estimating areal snowmelt infiltration into frozen soils

    D. M. Gray;Brenda Toth;Litong Zhao;J. W. Pomeroy

  • Modeling Forest Cover Influences on Snow Accumulation, Sublimation, and Melt

    A. N. Gelfan;J. W. Pomeroy;L. S. Kuchment

  • Measurement of the physical properties of the snowpack

    N. J. Kinar;J. W. Pomeroy

  • A distributed model of blowing snow over complex terrain

    Richard Essery;Long Li;John Pomeroy

  • The Energy Balance of the Winter Boreal Landscape

    R. J. Harding;J. W. Pomeroy

  • ESM-SnowMIP: assessing snow models and quantifying snow-related climate feedbacks

    Gerhard Krinner;Chris Derksen;Richard Essery;Mark Flanner

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Essery
Richard Essery University of Edinburgh
Howard Wheater
Howard Wheater Imperial College London
Paul H. Whitfield
Paul H. Whitfield University of Saskatchewan
Danny Marks
Danny Marks Agricultural Research Service
Timothy E. Link
Timothy E. Link University of Idaho
Sean K. Carey
Sean K. Carey McMaster University
Alain Pietroniro
Alain Pietroniro University of Saskatchewan
Helen M. Baulch
Helen M. Baulch University of Saskatchewan
Joseph M. Shea
Joseph M. Shea University of Northern British Columbia
William L. Quinton
William L. Quinton Wilfrid Laurier University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career options. Many professionals complement their environmental expertise with advanced degrees in public administration, sociology, or education to enhance their impact.

For those interested in leadership roles, exploring 1 year mpa programs offers an accelerated path to develop skills in public policy, organizational management, and sustainable development. These programs can be a great fit for environmental scientists aiming to influence policy or manage public projects.

Environmental issues are deeply connected to social dynamics. Pursuing an online bachelors in sociology provides a solid foundation in understanding societal impacts and cultural factors, useful for roles in community engagement or environmental advocacy.

For educators in environmental science, advanced degrees can expand career growth. Programs like online ed d programs without dissertation offer flexible options to gain expertise without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Additionally, many top universities offer seamless transitions through eds to edd programs, which are ideal for educators seeking the highest doctoral credentials to advance in academic or administrative roles.

Best Scientists Citing John W. Pomeroy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles