World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexander Zarbock

Alexander Zarbock

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 99 746 685 46 43 388 38763
Medicine 99 8544 8028 489 467 416 39186

Alexander Zarbock publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alexander Zarbock between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alexander Zarbock published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 25 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2023. 86 of the 525 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2023. 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 38 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 40 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 42 publications 2023: 46 publications 2024: 44 publications 2025: 42 publications
2005 2025

525 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alexander Zarbock: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 4
2006 7
2007 12
2008 11
2009 17
2010 5
2011 14
2012 16
2013 13
2014 23
2015 13
2016 31
2017 31
2018 38
2019 35
2020 40
2021 41
2022 42
2023 46
2024 44
2025 42
Total 525
Download as CSV

Alexander Zarbock publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Zarbock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 382–391 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 388 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71 388
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Alexander Zarbock D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Zarbock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68 99
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Alexander Zarbock is a researcher affiliated with the University of Münster in Germany. Their work primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with a concentration on nephrology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, epidemiology, and critical care and intensive care medicine. The research spans a variety of topics within these domains.

The main topics covered in Zarbock's research include:

  • Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Recent notable publications by Alexander Zarbock include:

  • Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 28th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup, 2023, Nature Reviews Nephrology
  • Acute kidney injury, 2021, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 25th Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) Workgroup, 2020, Nature Reviews Nephrology
  • Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Recommendations on Acute Kidney Injury Biomarkers From the Acute Disease Quality Initiative Consensus Conference, 2020, JAMA Network Open

Alexander Zarbock collaborates frequently with several researchers, notably:

  • John A. Kellum
  • Melanie Meersch
  • Marlies Ostermann
  • Thilo von Groote
  • Lui G. Forni

Their work has been published in several key scientific venues including:

  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Anesthesia & Analgesia
  • BMJ Open
  • Critical Care
  • Cells

Best Publications

  • Acute kidney disease and renal recovery: consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) 16 Workgroup

    Lakhmir S. Chawla;Rinaldo Bellomo;Azra Bihorac;Stuart L. Goldstein

  • Global epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury

    Eric A. J. Hoste;John A. Kellum;Nicholas M. Selby;Alexander Zarbock

  • Effect of Early vs Delayed Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: The ELAIN Randomized Clinical Trial

    Alexander Zarbock;John A. Kellum;Christoph Schmidt;Hugo Van Aken

  • Prevention of cardiac surgery-associated AKI by implementing the KDIGO guidelines in high risk patients identified by biomarkers: the PrevAKI randomized controlled trial

    Melanie Meersch;Christoph Schmidt;Andreas Hoffmeier;Hugo Van Aken

  • Platelet-neutrophil-interactions: linking hemostasis and inflammation.

    Alexander Zarbock;Alexander Zarbock;Renata K. Polanowska-Grabowska;Klaus Ley

  • Complete reversal of acid-induced acute lung injury by blocking of platelet-neutrophil aggregation

    Alexander Zarbock;Kai Singbartl;Klaus Ley

  • Neutrophils scan for activated platelets to initiate inflammation

    Vinatha Sreeramkumar;José M. Adrover;Ivan Ballesteros;Maria Isabel Cuartero

  • Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury.

    Starrt-Aki Investigators

  • GDF-15 is an inhibitor of leukocyte integrin activation required for survival after myocardial infarction in mice

    Tibor Kempf;Alexander Zarbock;Christian Widera;Stefan Butz

  • Recommendations on Acute Kidney Injury Biomarkers From the Acute Disease Quality Initiative Consensus Conference: A Consensus Statement.

    Marlies Ostermann;Alexander Zarbock;Stuart Goldstein;Kianoush Kashani

  • Leukocyte ligands for endothelial selectins: specialized glycoconjugates that mediate rolling and signaling under flow

    Alexander Zarbock;Klaus Ley;Rodger P. McEver;Andrés Hidalgo

  • Controversies in acute kidney injury : conclusions from a Kidney Disease : Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference

    Marlies Ostermann;Rinaldo Bellomo;Emmanuel A. Burdmann;Kent Doi

  • Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on kidney injury among high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

    Alexander Zarbock;Christoph Schmidt;Hugo Van Aken;Carola Wempe

  • Urinary TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 as Early Biomarkers of Acute Kidney Injury and Renal Recovery following Cardiac Surgery

    Melanie Meersch;Christoph Schmidt;Hugo Van Aken;Sven Martens

  • Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

    Can Ince;E Christiaan Boerma;Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer

  • To NET or not to NET:current opinions and state of the science regarding the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps

    Sebastian Boeltz;Poorya Amini;Hans Joachim Anders;Felipe Andrade

  • A Neutrophil Timer Coordinates Immune Defense and Vascular Protection

    Jose M Adrover;Carlos del Fresno;Georgiana Crainiciuc;Maria Isabel Cuartero

  • Sepsis-induced acute kidney injury revisited: pathophysiology, prevention and future therapies.

    Alexander Zarbock;Hernando Gomez;John A. Kellum

  • Spleen Tyrosine Kinase Syk Is Necessary for E-Selectin-Induced αLβ2 Integrin-Mediated Rolling on Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1

    Alexander Zarbock;Clifford A. Lowell;Klaus Ley

  • Leukocyte extravasation and vascular permeability are each controlled in vivo by different tyrosine residues of VE-cadherin

    Florian Wessel;Mark Winderlich;Maren Holm;Maike Frye

Frequent Co-Authors

Klaus Ley
Klaus Ley Augusta University
Hugo Van Aken
Hugo Van Aken University of Münster
John A. Kellum
John A. Kellum University of Pittsburgh
Dietmar Vestweber
Dietmar Vestweber Max Planck Society
Eric Hoste
Eric Hoste Ghent University Hospital
Marlies Ostermann
Marlies Ostermann King's College London
Andrés Hidalgo
Andrés Hidalgo Yale University
Oliver Soehnlein
Oliver Soehnlein University of Münster
Jan T. Kielstein
Jan T. Kielstein Hannover Medical School
Christian Weber
Christian Weber Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Immunology opens doors to various healthcare and research careers, often requiring specialized education. Many students explore complementary fields like nursing and mental health, with convenient online options available. For those interested in nursing, finding accredited LPN programs easy to get into can provide a practical and accessible pathway to start their healthcare journey.

Advancing further, aspiring nurses may consider the Family Nurse Practitioner route. Some students opt for the easiest FNP program options to balance rigorous study with real-world experience. This approach helps build critical skills applicable in immunology-related settings.

For those drawn to mental health, there are excellent opportunities through psychiatric nursing. The best psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs online offer robust clinical experiences vital for working with patients affected by immune-related psychiatric conditions.

Affordability is also key, and students can explore options like the cheapest online PMHNP programs to find quality education without excessive financial burden. These pathways complement immunology careers by enhancing understanding of patient care and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander Zarbock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles