World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sean M. Bagshaw

Sean M. Bagshaw

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
30599
World Ranking
10128
National Ranking
403

Sean M. Bagshaw publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sean M. Bagshaw sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 435 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Sean M. Bagshaw D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sean M. Bagshaw sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sean M. Bagshaw is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada and has made significant contributions to the field of Medicine, particularly in Nephrology. Their research has a strong focus on Acute Kidney Injury and related critical care topics.

Bagshaw's work spans several subfields including:

  • Nephrology
  • Epidemiology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery

They have also contributed extensively to the study of these main topics:

  • Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Sean M. Bagshaw has a record of publications in leading critical care and medical journals. Frequent venues for their studies include:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Critical Care
  • Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie
  • BMJ Open

Collaboration has been an important aspect of Bagshaw's career, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Ron Wald
  • Henry T. Stelfox
  • Oleksa Rewa
  • Rinaldo Bellomo
  • Marlies Ostermann

Recent representative papers authored or co-authored by Bagshaw include:

  • Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 28th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup, 2023, Nature Reviews Nephrology
  • Controversies in acute kidney injury: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference, 2020, Kidney International
  • Effect of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation vs Systemic Heparin Anticoagulation During Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy on Dialysis Filter Life Span and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury, 2020, JAMA
  • Postoperative acute kidney injury in adult non-cardiac surgery: joint consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative and PeriOperative Quality Initiative, 2021, Nature Reviews Nephrology

Best Publications

  • Global epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury

    Eric A. J. Hoste;John A. Kellum;Nicholas M. Selby;Alexander Zarbock

  • Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury.

    Starrt-Aki Investigators

  • The impact of frailty on intensive care unit outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    John Muscedere;John Muscedere;Braden Waters;Aditya Varambally;Sean M. Bagshaw

  • Controversies in acute kidney injury : conclusions from a Kidney Disease : Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference

    Marlies Ostermann;Rinaldo Bellomo;Emmanuel A. Burdmann;Kent Doi

  • Association between frailty and short- and long-term outcomes among critically ill patients: a multicentre prospective cohort study

    Sean M. Bagshaw;H. Thomas Stelfox;Robert C. McDermid;Darryl B. Rolfson

  • High-volume versus standard-volume haemofiltration for septic shock patients with acute kidney injury (IVOIRE study): a multicentre randomized controlled trial

    Olivier Joannes-Boyau;Patrick M. Honoré;Paul Perez;Sean M. Bagshaw

  • Plasma and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in septic versus non-septic acute kidney injury in critical illness

    Sean M Bagshaw;Sean M Bagshaw;Michael R Bennett;Michael Haase;Ania Haase-Fielitz

  • Timing of renal replacement therapy and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury.

    Sean M Bagshaw;Sean M Bagshaw;Shigehiko Uchino;Rinaldo Bellomo;Hiroshi Morimatsu

  • Changes in the incidence and outcome for early acute kidney injury in a cohort of Australian intensive care units

    Sean M Bagshaw;Sean M Bagshaw;Carol George;Rinaldo Bellomo;Rinaldo Bellomo

  • Effect of Targeted Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion on 28-Day Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock and Elevated Endotoxin Level: The EUPHRATES Randomized Clinical Trial.

    R. Phillip Dellinger;Sean M. Bagshaw;Massimo Antonelli;Debra M. Foster

  • Choice of renal replacement therapy modality and dialysis dependence after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Antoine Schneider;Rinaldo Bellomo;Sean M Bagshaw;Neil John Glassford

  • Epidemiology of cardio-renal syndromes: workgroup statements from the 7th ADQI Consensus Conference

    Sean M. Bagshaw;Dinna N. Cruz;Nadia Aspromonte;Luciano Daliento

  • The histopathology of septic acute kidney injury: a systematic review

    Christoph Langenberg;Christoph Langenberg;Sean M Bagshaw;Sean M Bagshaw;Clive N May;Rinaldo Bellomo;Rinaldo Bellomo

  • Oliguria as predictive biomarker of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients.

    John R Prowle;Yan-Lun Liu;Elisa Licari;Sean M Bagshaw

  • Transient azotaemia is associated with a high risk of death in hospitalized patients

    Shigehiko Uchino;Rinaldo Bellomo;Sean M Bagshaw;Donna Goldsmith

  • Association Between Fluid Balance and Outcomes in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Rashid Alobaidi;Catherine Morgan;Rajit K. Basu;Erin Stenson

  • Fluid balance as a biomarker: impact of fluid overload on outcome in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

    Sean M Bagshaw;Patrick D Brophy;Dinna Cruz;Claudio Ronco

  • Long-term association between frailty and health-related quality of life among survivors of critical illness: a prospective multicenter cohort study.

    Sean M. Bagshaw;H. Thomas Stelfox;Jeffrey A. Johnson;Robert C. McDermid

  • The status of intensive care medicine research and a future agenda for very old patients in the ICU

    H Flaatten;H Flaatten;DW de Lange;A Artigas;D Bin

  • A comparison of the RIFLE and AKIN criteria for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Commentary

    John A Kellum;Sean M. Bagshaw;Carol George;Rinaldo Bellomo

Frequent Co-Authors

Rinaldo Bellomo
Rinaldo Bellomo Monash University
Claudio Ronco
Claudio Ronco University of Padua
John A. Kellum
John A. Kellum University of Pittsburgh
Deborah J. Cook
Deborah J. Cook McMaster University
Eric Hoste
Eric Hoste Ghent University Hospital
Stuart L. Goldstein
Stuart L. Goldstein Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Andrew D. Shaw
Andrew D. Shaw University of Alberta
Neill K. J. Adhikari
Neill K. J. Adhikari University of Toronto
Ravindra L. Mehta
Ravindra L. Mehta University of California, San Diego
Michael Bailey
Michael Bailey Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring further opportunities in the medical field? Whether you’re just starting or seeking career advancement, online degrees can offer accessible and flexible options. Popular choices include the dnp online programs, which allow working nurses to gain advanced clinical skills and leadership expertise at a doctoral level.

For those entering nursing, lpn program options provide affordable, fast-track entry points into healthcare. If you’re interested in specialized nursing, consider online msn pmhnp programs to become a Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner—an in-demand specialty.

Not all roles focus on direct patient care. The health care administration online degree can prepare you for management or leadership roles in hospitals and clinics. Each of these online pathways offers flexibility to balance study with other commitments, making them attractive options for students and professionals alike.

Best Scientists Citing Sean M. Bagshaw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles