World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Bailey

Michael Bailey

Award Badge
Medicine
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 118 4022 3767 111 107 738 58931

Michael Bailey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Bailey between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Bailey published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 19.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2014. 37 of the 900 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2014. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 37 publications 2008: 31 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 44 publications 2011: 44 publications 2012: 46 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 55 publications 2015: 48 publications 2016: 40 publications 2017: 43 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 40 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 41 publications 2025: 33 publications 2026: 4 publications
1981 2026

900 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Bailey: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 0
1997 9
1998 7
1999 18
2000 14
2001 16
2002 7
2003 17
2004 16
2005 30
2006 24
2007 37
2008 31
2009 31
2010 44
2011 44
2012 46
2013 41
2014 55
2015 48
2016 40
2017 43
2018 28
2019 33
2020 40
2021 33
2022 37
2023 29
2024 41
2025 33
2026 4
Total 900
Download as CSV

Michael Bailey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Bailey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 721–740 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 738 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259 738
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Bailey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Bailey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302 118
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Michael Bailey is affiliated with Monash University in Australia. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields, combining expertise in Computer Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The primary areas of focus in their work include molecular biology and artificial intelligence approaches applied to biological and computational problems.

Their scientific contributions cover a range of topics including RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, computational drug discovery methods, and advanced machine learning algorithms for detecting harmful online content and cybersecurity threats. Specifically, their work addresses issues such as hate speech and cyberbullying detection, spam and phishing detection, and sophisticated malware detection techniques.

Michael Bailey's publication record shows a blend of experimental and computational studies published in specialized journals and preprint servers. Notable recent publications include:

  • CodonBERT large language model for mRNA vaccines (2024, Genome Research)
  • CodonBERT: Large Language Models for mRNA design and optimization (2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))
  • Representations of lipid nanoparticles using large language models for transfection efficiency prediction (2024, Bioinformatics)
  • Designing Toxic Content Classification for a Diversity of Perspectives (2021, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Testing Snowden's Hypothesis Does Mere Awareness Drive Opposition to Government Surveillance? (2020, Public Opinion Quarterly)

Their frequent coauthors include scholars with whom they have collaborated extensively, indicating a network of multidisciplinary research partnerships. Regular collaborators include Lorenzo Kogler-Anele, Ziv Bar-Joseph, Sven Jäger, Sizhen Li, and Saeed Moayedpour.

Michael Bailey's work has appeared most often in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
  • Genome Research
  • Bioinformatics

Their research integrates computational theory, information systems, and sociopolitical aspects of technology, as evidenced by publications in sociology and political science subfields alongside molecular biology topics. This multidisciplinary approach supports their investigations into both biological systems and digital communication phenomena.

Best Publications

  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Andrew Davies;Daryl Jones;Michael Bailey;John Beca

  • Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock

    Sandra Lois Peake;Anthony Delaney;Michael John Bailey;Rinaldo Bellomo

  • Adjustable gastric banding and conventional therapy for type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial

    John B. Dixon;Paul E. O'Brien;Julie Playfair;Leon Chapman

  • Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012

    Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen;Michael John Bailey;Satoshi Suzuki;David V Pilcher

  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria in Defining Severe Sepsis

    Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen;Michael John Bailey;David V Pilcher;David James Cooper

  • Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in australia and new zealand.

    Steven A R Webb;Ville Yrjo Olavi Pettila;Ian M Seppelt;Rinaldo Bellomo

  • Association Between a Chloride-Liberal vs Chloride-Restrictive Intravenous Fluid Administration Strategy and Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Adults

    Nor'azim Mohd Yunos;Rinaldo Bellomo;Colin Hegarty;David Story

  • Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

    Eamon P. Raith;Eamon P. Raith;Andrew A. Udy;Andrew A. Udy;Michael Bailey;Steven McGloughlin;Steven McGloughlin

  • Predicting Survival after Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Failure. The Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) Score

    Matthieu Schmidt;Michael Bailey;Jayne Sheldrake;Carol Hodgson

  • Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-score

    Matthieu Schmidt;Aidan Burrell;Lloyd Roberts;Michael Bailey

  • Effect of a Buffered Crystalloid Solution vs Saline on Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: The SPLIT Randomized Clinical Trial

    Paul Jeffrey Young;Michael John Bailey;Richard W Beasley;Seton J Henderson;Seton J Henderson

  • Development and Validation of the Medication Regimen Complexity Index

    Johnson George;Yee-ting Phun;Michael John Bailey;David C M Kong

  • Early Intensive Care Sedation Predicts Long-Term Mortality in Ventilated Critically Ill Patients

    Yahya Shehabi;Rinaldo Bellomo;Michael C Reade;Michael C Reade;Michael John Bailey

  • Early, Goal-Directed Therapy for Septic Shock - A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.

    Prism Investigators;Kathryn M Rowan;Derek C Angus;Michael Bailey

  • beta-Actin and GAPDH housekeeping gene expression in asthmatic airways is variable and not suitable for normalising mRNA levels.

    E M Glare;M Divjak;M J Bailey;E H Walters;E H Walters

  • Cerebral radiation necrosis: incidence, outcomes, and risk factors with emphasis on radiation parameters and chemotherapy.

    Jeremy D Ruben;Michael Dally;Michael John Bailey;Robin Smith

  • Blood glucose concentration and outcome of critical illness: The impact of diabetes*

    Moritoki Egi;Rinaldo Bellomo;Edward Stachowski;Craig J French

  • A randomized trial of rTMS targeted with MRI based neuro-navigation in treatment-resistant depression

    Paul Bernard Fitzgerald;Kate Elizabeth Hoy;Susan Ann McQueen;Jerome Joseph Maller

  • Hypoglycemia and outcome in critically ill patients.

    Moritoki Egi;Rinaldo Bellomo;Edward Stachowski;Craig J French

  • Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Operative Rib Fixation in Traumatic Flail Chest

    Silvana F Marasco;Silvana F Marasco;Andrew R Davies;Jamie Cooper;Dinesh Varma;Dinesh Varma

Frequent Co-Authors

Rinaldo Bellomo
Rinaldo Bellomo Monash University
Michael J. Abramson
Michael J. Abramson Monash University
Richard Beasley
Richard Beasley Medical Research Institute of New Zealand
Trevor Williams
Trevor Williams Texas A&M University
Peter Cameron
Peter Cameron Monash University
Simon Finfer
Simon Finfer George Institute for Global Health
Ville Pettilä
Ville Pettilä University of Helsinki
Eugene Haydn Walters
Eugene Haydn Walters University of Tasmania
Andrew Forbes
Andrew Forbes Monash University
Theodore J. Iwashyna
Theodore J. Iwashyna University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering a career in Medicine, exploring related online degrees can offer both flexibility and affordability. Many healthcare professionals start their journey in nursing before moving toward advanced medical careers. Choosing online programs can save time and lower costs while still preparing you for specialized roles in the medical field.

If you're interested in becoming a nurse practitioner, check out these cheapest online np programs to find high-quality education at a lower cost. For those looking to start or advance in nursing, there are many cheap online nursing programs covering a range of specialties and credentials.

Nurses aiming for leadership roles or advanced clinical practice may consider doctorate-level degrees. Explore the cheapest dnp programs to find options that fit your career goals without overwhelming debt. If you're already an RN and want to further your education, you can find the cheapest rn to bsn program to help boost your qualifications and open doors to more opportunities in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Bailey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles