World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Bailey

Michael Bailey

Award Badge
Medicine
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
118
Citations
58931
World Ranking
4022
National Ranking
111

Michael Bailey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Bailey sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 738 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael Bailey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Bailey sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Michael Bailey is affiliated with Monash University in Australia. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields, combining expertise in Computer Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The primary areas of focus in their work include molecular biology and artificial intelligence approaches applied to biological and computational problems.

Their scientific contributions cover a range of topics including RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, computational drug discovery methods, and advanced machine learning algorithms for detecting harmful online content and cybersecurity threats. Specifically, their work addresses issues such as hate speech and cyberbullying detection, spam and phishing detection, and sophisticated malware detection techniques.

Michael Bailey's publication record shows a blend of experimental and computational studies published in specialized journals and preprint servers. Notable recent publications include:

  • CodonBERT large language model for mRNA vaccines (2024, Genome Research)
  • CodonBERT: Large Language Models for mRNA design and optimization (2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))
  • Representations of lipid nanoparticles using large language models for transfection efficiency prediction (2024, Bioinformatics)
  • Designing Toxic Content Classification for a Diversity of Perspectives (2021, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Testing Snowden's Hypothesis Does Mere Awareness Drive Opposition to Government Surveillance? (2020, Public Opinion Quarterly)

Their frequent coauthors include scholars with whom they have collaborated extensively, indicating a network of multidisciplinary research partnerships. Regular collaborators include Lorenzo Kogler-Anele, Ziv Bar-Joseph, Sven Jäger, Sizhen Li, and Saeed Moayedpour.

Michael Bailey's work has appeared most often in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
  • Genome Research
  • Bioinformatics

Their research integrates computational theory, information systems, and sociopolitical aspects of technology, as evidenced by publications in sociology and political science subfields alongside molecular biology topics. This multidisciplinary approach supports their investigations into both biological systems and digital communication phenomena.

Best Publications

  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Andrew Davies;Daryl Jones;Michael Bailey;John Beca

  • Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock

    Sandra Lois Peake;Anthony Delaney;Michael John Bailey;Rinaldo Bellomo

  • Adjustable gastric banding and conventional therapy for type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial

    John B. Dixon;Paul E. O'Brien;Julie Playfair;Leon Chapman

  • Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012

    Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen;Michael John Bailey;Satoshi Suzuki;David V Pilcher

  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria in Defining Severe Sepsis

    Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen;Michael John Bailey;David V Pilcher;David James Cooper

  • Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in australia and new zealand.

    Steven A R Webb;Ville Yrjo Olavi Pettila;Ian M Seppelt;Rinaldo Bellomo

  • Association Between a Chloride-Liberal vs Chloride-Restrictive Intravenous Fluid Administration Strategy and Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Adults

    Nor'azim Mohd Yunos;Rinaldo Bellomo;Colin Hegarty;David Story

  • Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

    Eamon P. Raith;Eamon P. Raith;Andrew A. Udy;Andrew A. Udy;Michael Bailey;Steven McGloughlin;Steven McGloughlin

  • Predicting Survival after Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Failure. The Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) Score

    Matthieu Schmidt;Michael Bailey;Jayne Sheldrake;Carol Hodgson

  • Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-score

    Matthieu Schmidt;Aidan Burrell;Lloyd Roberts;Michael Bailey

  • Effect of a Buffered Crystalloid Solution vs Saline on Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: The SPLIT Randomized Clinical Trial

    Paul Jeffrey Young;Michael John Bailey;Richard W Beasley;Seton J Henderson;Seton J Henderson

  • Development and Validation of the Medication Regimen Complexity Index

    Johnson George;Yee-ting Phun;Michael John Bailey;David C M Kong

  • Early Intensive Care Sedation Predicts Long-Term Mortality in Ventilated Critically Ill Patients

    Yahya Shehabi;Rinaldo Bellomo;Michael C Reade;Michael C Reade;Michael John Bailey

  • Early, Goal-Directed Therapy for Septic Shock - A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.

    Prism Investigators;Kathryn M Rowan;Derek C Angus;Michael Bailey

  • beta-Actin and GAPDH housekeeping gene expression in asthmatic airways is variable and not suitable for normalising mRNA levels.

    E M Glare;M Divjak;M J Bailey;E H Walters;E H Walters

  • Cerebral radiation necrosis: incidence, outcomes, and risk factors with emphasis on radiation parameters and chemotherapy.

    Jeremy D Ruben;Michael Dally;Michael John Bailey;Robin Smith

  • Blood glucose concentration and outcome of critical illness: The impact of diabetes*

    Moritoki Egi;Rinaldo Bellomo;Edward Stachowski;Craig J French

  • A randomized trial of rTMS targeted with MRI based neuro-navigation in treatment-resistant depression

    Paul Bernard Fitzgerald;Kate Elizabeth Hoy;Susan Ann McQueen;Jerome Joseph Maller

  • Hypoglycemia and outcome in critically ill patients.

    Moritoki Egi;Rinaldo Bellomo;Edward Stachowski;Craig J French

  • Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Operative Rib Fixation in Traumatic Flail Chest

    Silvana F Marasco;Silvana F Marasco;Andrew R Davies;Jamie Cooper;Dinesh Varma;Dinesh Varma

Frequent Co-Authors

Rinaldo Bellomo
Rinaldo Bellomo Monash University
Michael J. Abramson
Michael J. Abramson Monash University
Richard Beasley
Richard Beasley Medical Research Institute of New Zealand
Trevor Williams
Trevor Williams Texas A&M University
Peter Cameron
Peter Cameron Monash University
Simon Finfer
Simon Finfer George Institute for Global Health
Ville Pettilä
Ville Pettilä University of Helsinki
Eugene Haydn Walters
Eugene Haydn Walters University of Tasmania
Andrew Forbes
Andrew Forbes Monash University
Theodore J. Iwashyna
Theodore J. Iwashyna University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering a career in Medicine, exploring related online degrees can offer both flexibility and affordability. Many healthcare professionals start their journey in nursing before moving toward advanced medical careers. Choosing online programs can save time and lower costs while still preparing you for specialized roles in the medical field.

If you're interested in becoming a nurse practitioner, check out these cheapest online np programs to find high-quality education at a lower cost. For those looking to start or advance in nursing, there are many cheap online nursing programs covering a range of specialties and credentials.

Nurses aiming for leadership roles or advanced clinical practice may consider doctorate-level degrees. Explore the cheapest dnp programs to find options that fit your career goals without overwhelming debt. If you're already an RN and want to further your education, you can find the cheapest rn to bsn program to help boost your qualifications and open doors to more opportunities in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Bailey

Trending Scientists