World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 100 8337 7835 247 242 530 32707

Andrew Forbes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew Forbes between 1968 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew Forbes published across 59 years, from 1968 to 2026, averaging 19.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 82 publications in 2013. 32 of the 1,150 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 82. Peak 82 publications in 2013. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 37 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 54 publications 2009: 50 publications 2010: 45 publications 2011: 45 publications 2012: 57 publications 2013: 82 publications 2014: 69 publications 2015: 61 publications 2016: 65 publications 2017: 59 publications 2018: 63 publications 2019: 76 publications 2020: 81 publications 2021: 69 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 29 publications 2026: 3 publications
1968 2026

1,150 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew Forbes: publications per year, 1968 to 2026
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 4
1994 4
1995 5
1996 6
1997 11
1998 8
1999 11
2000 12
2001 11
2002 13
2003 13
2004 12
2005 19
2006 37
2007 15
2008 54
2009 50
2010 45
2011 45
2012 57
2013 82
2014 69
2015 61
2016 65
2017 59
2018 63
2019 76
2020 81
2021 69
2022 21
2023 20
2024 17
2025 29
2026 3
Total 1,150
Download as CSV

Andrew Forbes publications per year - data summary

  • Andrew Forbes, a Medicine scholar from Monash University, has 1,150 publications recorded across 59 years, from 1968 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1968 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 82 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1968, 1989 and 1992, with 1 publication each.
  • 22 of the 59 years in the span carry no publications at all (1969, 1970, 1971, 1972 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 19.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 31.1 per year counting only the 37 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 90 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1968-1987: 1 publication (0.1 per year); 1988-2007: 183 publications (9.2 per year); 2008-2026: 966 publications (50.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Andrew Forbes publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Forbes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 530 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610 530
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew Forbes publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Andrew Forbes, a Medicine scholar from Monash University, records 530 publications - the 63rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 63% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Andrew Forbes, and about 37% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Andrew Forbes ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Andrew Forbes D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Forbes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 100
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Andrew Forbes D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Andrew Forbes, a Medicine scholar from Monash University, records 100 D-Index - the 60th percentile of the discipline.
  • 60% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Andrew Forbes, and about 40% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Andrew Forbes ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Quantum mechanics
  • Internal medicine
  • Optics

Andrew Forbes mostly deals with Randomized controlled trial, Optics, Surgery, Physical therapy and Internal medicine. His studies in Randomized controlled trial integrate themes in fields like Osteoarthritis, Anesthesia, Clinical trial and Relative risk, Number needed to treat. His Clinical trial research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Psychological intervention and Patient satisfaction.

His Optics research includes themes of Optical field and Angular momentum. The study incorporates disciplines such as Quantum entanglement, Bessel function and Photon in addition to Angular momentum. His Surgery research includes elements of Cartilage and Risk factor.

His most cited work include:

  • Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-Aware randomised controlled trial (901 citations)
  • Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-Aware randomised controlled trial (901 citations)
  • Avoidance of nitrous oxide for patients undergoing major surgery - A randomized controlled trial (305 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Optics, Laser, Angular momentum, Quantum mechanics and Randomized controlled trial. His Spatial light modulator, Beam, Laser beam quality, Bessel function and Holography study are his primary interests in Optics. His Laser study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Optoelectronics and Resonator.

His research in Angular momentum is mostly concerned with Orbital angular momentum of light. His study in Randomized controlled trial is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Anesthesia, Physical therapy and Clinical trial. As part of one scientific family, Andrew Forbes deals mainly with the area of Physical therapy, narrowing it down to issues related to the Osteoarthritis, and often Cartilage.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Optics (51.21%)
  • Laser (18.86%)
  • Angular momentum (16.78%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Optics (51.21%)
  • Structured light (7.35%)
  • Angular momentum (16.78%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Optics, Structured light, Angular momentum, Quantum and Quantum entanglement. His Optics study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as Phase. His Structured light research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Polarization, Holography, Vortex, Electronic engineering and Laser.

His Angular momentum research incorporates themes from Field, Optical communication and Optical tweezers. The concepts of his Quantum entanglement study are interwoven with issues in Topology and Photon. His Photon study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Quantum state, Quantum tomography, Quantum channel and Quantum network.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery (254 citations)
  • A review of complex vector light fields and their applications (125 citations)
  • Creation and Detection of Vector Vortex Modes for Classical and Quantum Communication (110 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Quantum mechanics
  • Internal medicine
  • Optics

His primary areas of investigation include Optics, Structured light, Randomized controlled trial, Angular momentum and Quantum entanglement. Optics is closely attributed to Phase in his work. His Structured light study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Superposition principle, Laser and Holography.

His Randomized controlled trial study which covers Clinical trial that intersects with Physical therapy. His study in Angular momentum is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Geometric phase, Spatial light modulator, Optical communication, Helicity and Quantum information science. His studies in Quantum entanglement integrate themes in fields like Statistical physics, Classical mechanics and Photon.

Best Publications

  • Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-Aware randomised controlled trial

    Paul S Myles;Kate Leslie;Kate Leslie;John James McNeil;John James McNeil;Andrew Benjamin Forbes;Andrew Benjamin Forbes

  • Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery

    Paul S Myles;Rinaldo Bellomo;Tomas Corcoran;Tomas Corcoran;Andrew Forbes

  • Controlled generation of higher-order Poincaré sphere beams from a laser

    Darryl Naidoo;Filippus S. Roux;Filippus S. Roux;Angela Dudley;Angela Dudley;Igor Litvin

  • Incidence of Malignant Disease in Biopsy-Proven Inflammatory Myopathy: A Population-Based Cohort Study

    Rachelle Buchbinder;Andrew Benjamin Forbes;Stephen Hall;Xenia Dennett

  • Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions for painful shoulder: selection criteria, outcome assessment, and efficacy

    Sally Green;Rachelle Buchbinder;Richard Glazier;Andrew Forbes

  • Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration

    Karla Hemming;Monica Taljaard;Monica Taljaard;Joanne E McKenzie;Richard Hooper

  • Avoidance of nitrous oxide for patients undergoing major surgery - A randomized controlled trial

    Paul S Myles;Kate Leslie;Matthew T V Chan;Andrew Benjamin Forbes

  • Ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial.

    Rachelle Buchbinder;Ronnie Ptasznik;Jeanine Gordon;Joylene Buchanan

  • Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review

    Benjamin Gornall;Paul S Myles;Paul S Myles;Cathie Smith;Justin Burke

  • Effect of Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma vs Placebo Injection on Pain and Medial Tibial Cartilage Volume in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: The RESTORE Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Kim L Bennell;Kade L Paterson;Ben R Metcalf;Vicky Duong

  • SINGLE-VERSUS MULTIPLE–DOSE ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS FOR MAJOR SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

    Malcolm McDonald;Elizabeth Grabsch;Caroline Marshall;Andrew B Forbes

  • Acupuncture for Chronic Knee Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Rana S Hinman;Paul McCrory;Marie V Pirotta;Ian Relf

  • Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions

    Matthew Page;Joanne Ellen McKenzie;Jamie Kirkham;Kerry Dwan

  • Are Asthma Medications and Management Related to Deaths from Asthma

    Michael J. Abramson;Michael J. Bailey;Fiona J. Couper;Jan S. Driver

  • Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging.

    Flavia Cicuttini;Andrew Forbes;Kevin Morris;Sandy Darling

  • The effect of bispectral index monitoring on long-term survival in the B-aware trial.

    Kate Leslie;Paul S Myles;Andrew Benjamin Forbes;Mathew T V Chan

  • Rate of cartilage loss at two years predicts subsequent total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study

    Flavia Maria Cicuttini;G Jones;Andrew Benjamin Forbes;Anita Wluka

  • Risk Factors for Cerebral Hemorrhage in the Era of Well-Controlled Hypertension

    Amanda G. Thrift;John J. McNeil;Andrew Forbes;Geoffrey A. Donnan

  • Effect of Early Sustained Prophylactic Hypothermia on Neurologic Outcomes Among Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: The POLAR Randomized Clinical Trial.

    D. James Cooper;D. James Cooper;Alistair D. Nichol;Michael Bailey;Stephen Bernard;Stephen Bernard

  • A randomized, blinded, controlled trial investigating the gastrointestinal health effects of drinking water quality

    Margaret E. Hellard;Martha I. Sinclair;Andrew B. Forbes;Christopher K. Fairley

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul S. Myles
Paul S. Myles Monash University
Flavia M. Cicuttini
Flavia M. Cicuttini Monash University
Dean Philip McKenzie
Dean Philip McKenzie Monash University
Rachelle Buchbinder
Rachelle Buchbinder Monash University
Kim L. Bennell
Kim L. Bennell University of Melbourne
Anita E. Wluka
Anita E. Wluka Monash University
Michael J. Abramson
Michael J. Abramson Monash University
John J McNeil
John J McNeil Monash University
Miles J. Padgett
Miles J. Padgett University of Glasgow
Rana S. Hinman
Rana S. Hinman University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to many rewarding healthcare careers. While traditional medical programs are highly competitive, numerous alternative and complementary pathways are available online. For instance, many students look for what’s the easiest nursing program to get into? to start their journey with more accessible entry requirements.

If direct patient care isn’t your preference, medical billing and coding is a booming field. Consider enrolling in one of the accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid for flexible, entry-level positions in healthcare administration.

For those aiming to become a licensed practical nurse, it’s helpful to know that some schools don’t require standardized entrance exams. Learn more about whether do you have to take a teas test for lpn at your target institutions.

Finally, for those interested in leadership or management, a degree in healthcare administration can open many doors, with fast-track, online options available.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Forbes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles