World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
8003
World Ranking
7621
National Ranking
64

Peter Steier publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Steier sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 257 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter Steier D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Steier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Steier is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria and has a significant body of research focused on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences. Their academic interests frequently intersect with topics such as radioactive contamination and transfer, radioactivity and radon measurements, geology and paleoclimatology research, as well as radioactive element chemistry and processing.

The scientist's extensive publication record includes contributions to several specialized venues. Notably, Steier has published multiple papers in the following outlets:

  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Nature Communications

Among their recent papers are:

  • "233U/236U signature allows to distinguish environmental emissions of civil nuclear industry from weapons fallout" (2020, Nature Communications)
  • "An unknown source of reactor radionuclides in the Baltic Sea revealed by multi-isotope fingerprints" (2021, Nature Communications)
  • "70-Year Anthropogenic Uranium Imprints of Nuclear Activities in Baltic Sea Sediments" (2021, Environmental Science & Technology)
  • "Pushing Limits of ICP-MS/MS for the Determination of Ultralow 236U/238U Isotope Ratios" (2020, Analytical Chemistry)
  • "Prehistoric salt mining in Hallstatt, Austria. New chronologies out of small wooden fragments" (2021, Dendrochronologia)

Steier's frequent collaborators include:

  • Karin Hain
  • Robin Golser
  • Jixin Qiao
  • Martin Martschini
  • Eva Maria Wild

Their main fields of study are environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with detailed subfields such as global and planetary change, atmospheric science, radiological and ultrasound technology, inorganic chemistry, and radiation. This multidisciplinary expertise supports research across both natural and applied science domains.

Key topic areas of Steier's work include:

  • Radioactive contamination and transfer
  • Radioactivity and radon measurements
  • Geology and paleoclimatology research
  • Radioactive element chemistry and processing
  • Isotope analysis in ecology
  • Nuclear physics and applications
  • Pleistocene-era hominins and archaeology

Best Publications

  • Biogeochemically diverse organic matter in Alpine glaciers and its downstream fate

    Gabriel A. Singer;Christina Fasching;Linda Wilhelm;Jutta Niggemann

  • Recent near-Earth supernovae probed by global deposition of interstellar radioactive 60 Fe

    A. Wallner;J. Feige;N. Kinoshita;M. Paul

  • Chronology for the Aegean Late Bronze Age 1700-1400 B.C.

    Sturt W. Manning;Christopher Bronk Ramsey;Walter Kutschera;Thomas Higham

  • Iodine-129 in Seawater Offshore Fukushima: distribution, inorganic speciation, sources, and budget.

    Xiaolin Hou;Pavel P. Povinec;Luyuan Zhang;Keliang Shi

  • New half-life measurement of 182Hf: improved chronometer for the early solar system.

    C. Vockenhuber;F. Oberli;M. Bichler;I. Ahmad

  • Direct dating of Early Upper Palaeolithic human remains from Mladeč

    Eva M. Wild;Maria Teschler-Nicola;Walter Kutschera;Peter Steier

  • Natural and anthropogenic 236U in environmental samples

    Peter Steier;Max Bichler;L. Keith Fifield;Robin Golser

  • 14C dating with the bomb peak: An application to forensic medicine

    E.M Wild;K.A Arlamovsky;R Golser;W Kutschera

  • Abundance of live 244Pu in deep-sea reservoirs on Earth points to rarity of actinide nucleosynthesis

    Anton Wallner;T. Faestermann;J. Feige;C Feldstein

  • The use of Bayesian statistics for 14C dates of chronologically ordered samples : A critical analysis

    Peter Steier;Werner Rom

  • First results on 236U levels in global fallout

    A. Sakaguchi;A. Sakaguchi;K. Kawai;P. Steier;F. Quinto

  • Towards more precise 10Be and 36Cl data from measurements at the 10−14 level: Influence of sample preparation

    S. Merchel;M. Arnold;G. Aumaitre;L. Benedetti

  • Cesium, iodine and tritium in NW Pacific waters - a comparison of the Fukushima impact with global fallout

    P. P. Povinec;M. Aoyama;D. Biddulph;R. Breier

  • Accelerator mass spectrometry of heavy long-lived radionuclides

    Christof Vockenhuber;Irshad Ahmad;Robin Golser;Walter Kutschera

  • Precise dating of the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic transition in Murcia (Spain) supports late Neandertal persistence in Iberia

    João Zilhão;João Zilhão;João Zilhão;Daniela Anesin;Thierry Aubry;Ernestina Badal

  • Isotopic determination of U, Pu and Cs in environmental waters following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident

    Aya Sakaguchi;Akinobu Kadokura;Peter Steier;Kazuya Tanaka

  • Pego do Diabo (Loures, Portugal): dating the emergence of anatomical modernity in westernmost Eurasia.

    João Zilhão;Simon J.M. Davis;Cidalia Duarte;Antonio Manuel Monge Soares

  • Bomb fall-out 236 U as a global oceanic tracer using an annually resolved coral core

    Stephan R. Winkler;Peter Steier;Jessica Carilli

  • Isotopic Compositions of 236U and Pu Isotopes in “Black Substances” Collected from Roadsides in Fukushima Prefecture: Fallout from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident

    Aya Sakaguchi;Peter Steier;Yoshio Takahashi;Masayoshi Yamamoto

  • Uranium-236 as a new oceanic tracer: A first depth profile in the Japan Sea and comparison with caesium-137.

    Aya Sakaguchi;Akinobu Kadokura;Peter Steier;Yoshio Takahashi

  • Airborne Plutonium and Non-Natural Uranium from the Fukushima DNPP Found at 120 km Distance a Few Days after Reactor Hydrogen Explosions

    Taeko Shinonaga;Peter Steier;Markus Lagos;Takehisa Ohkura

  • Analysis and application of heavy isotopes in the environment

    Peter Steier;Franz Dellinger;Oliver Forstner;Robin Golser

  • Determination of plutonium in environmental samples by AMS and alpha spectrometry

    E. Hrnecek;P. Steier;A. Wallner

  • Predicting soil organic matter stability in agricultural fields through carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes

    Tim De Clercq;Maria Heiling;Gerd Dercon;Christian Resch

  • Neolithic Massacres: Local Skirmishes or General Warfare in Europe?

    Eva Maria Wild;Peter Stadler;Annemarie Häußer;Walter Kutschera

Frequent Co-Authors

L. Keith Fifield
L. Keith Fifield Australian National University
L.K. Fifield
L.K. Fifield Australian National University
Pavel P. Povinec
Pavel P. Povinec Comenius University
Yoshio Takahashi
Yoshio Takahashi University of Tokyo
Maurice Arnold
Maurice Arnold Collège de France
João Zilhão
João Zilhão University of Lisbon
Régis Braucher
Régis Braucher Aix-Marseille University
Horst Geckeis
Horst Geckeis Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Christopher Bronk Ramsey
Christopher Bronk Ramsey University of Oxford
Göran Possnert
Göran Possnert Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students seek affordable options, making the most affordable online general studies degree programs a popular choice for building a flexible academic foundation.

If ease of completion is a priority, there are options considered among the easiest bachelor's degree programs that still provide valuable skills applicable in environmental roles.

For a more specialized focus, pursuing an online geologist degree allows students to study Earth processes and contribute to fields like natural resource management and environmental consulting. You can find top programs highlighted in the geologist degree online resources.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) expertise is increasingly vital for environmental analysis and planning. Online programs ranked among the gis degree offerings provide students with in-demand technical skills to support sustainable initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Steier

Trending Scientists