World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 54 12859 11567 9 9 115 7688
Biology and Biochemistry 54 15840 14541 10 10 122 7858

Peter Maček publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Maček between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Maček published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1997. 4 of the 128 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1997. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1981 2025

128 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Maček: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 4
1991 1
1992 4
1993 2
1994 3
1995 5
1996 4
1997 7
1998 2
1999 7
2000 6
2001 5
2002 4
2003 6
2004 5
2005 6
2006 4
2007 6
2008 3
2009 4
2010 4
2011 1
2012 1
2013 4
2014 4
2015 5
2016 3
2017 2
2018 2
2019 2
2020 1
2021 1
2022 2
2023 0
2024 3
2025 1
Total 128
Download as CSV

Peter Maček publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Maček sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 115 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623 115
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Maček D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Maček sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933 54
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Maček is affiliated with the University of Ljubljana in Slovenia. Their research spans biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a focus on several specialized subfields including molecular biology, genetics, surgery, biomedical engineering, and atomic and molecular physics and optics.

Their scholarly work primarily addresses topics such as lipid membrane structure and behavior, inflammatory bowel disease, nanopore and nanochannel transport studies, spectroscopy and quantum chemical studies, bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing, bacterial genetics and biotechnology, and mass spectrometry techniques and applications.

Peter Maček has contributed to multiple publications with emphasis on disease and molecular interactions. Notable papers include:

  • Ultrasensitive Label-Free Detection of Protein-Membrane Interaction Exemplified by Toxin-Liposome Insertion, 2022, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
  • Crystal structure of RahU, an aegerolysin protein from the human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and its interaction with membrane ceramide phosphorylethanolamine, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Ultrasensitive Label-Free Detection of Protein−Membrane Interaction Exemplified by Toxin-Liposome Insertion, 2022, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • P1026 Clinical decision support tool for vedolizumab could not predict outcome in ulcerative colitis patients - a retrospective real-life single-centre cohort study, 2024, Journal of Crohn s and Colitis
  • P773 Clinical decision support tool for vedolizumab is useful in predicting endoscopic remission in Crohn's disease - a retrospective real-life single-centre cohort study, 2024, Journal of Crohn s and Colitis

Frequent publication venues where Peter Maček's work appears include:

  • Journal of Crohn s and Colitis
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
  • Scientific Reports
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • European Urology

Collaboration is evident in their work, with frequent coauthors being Andreja Ocepek, Tereza Schönfeldová, Halil İ. Okur, Valerija Vezočnik, and Ioan Iacovache. These collaborations reflect engagement across various studies in their research fields.

Best Publications

  • Cytolytic peptide and protein toxins from sea anemones (Anthozoa: Actiniaria).

    Gregor Anderluh;Peter Maček

  • Surface plasmon resonance in protein-membrane interactions

    Mojca Beseničar;Peter Maček;Jeremy H. Lakey;Gregor Anderluh

  • Crystal Structure of the Soluble Form of Equinatoxin II, a Pore-Forming Toxin from the Sea Anemone Actinia equina

    Alekos Athanasiadis;Gregor Anderluh;Peter Maček;Dušan Turk

  • Two-step membrane binding by equinatoxin II, a pore-forming toxin from the sea anemone, involves an exposed aromatic cluster and a flexible helix

    Qi Hong;Ion Gutiérrez-Aguirre;Ariana Barlič;Petra Malovrh

  • Pore formation by the sea anemone cytolysin equinatoxin II in red blood cells and model lipid membranes.

    Giovanna Belmonte;Cecilia Pederzolli;Peter Maček;Gianfranco Menestrina

  • Molecular Determinants of Sphingomyelin Specificity of a Eukaryotic Pore-forming Toxin *

    Biserka Bakrač;Ion Gutiérrez-Aguirre;Zdravko Podlesek;Andreas F.-P. Sonnen

  • Molecular mechanism of pore formation by actinoporins.

    Katarina Črnigoj Kristan;Gabriella Viero;Mauro Dalla Serra;Peter Maček

  • pH and Temperature-Induced Molten Globule-Like Denatured States of Equinatoxin II: A Study by UV-Melting, DSC, Far- and Near-UV CD Spectroscopy, and ANS Fluorescence†

    Nataša Poklar;Jurij Lah;Mateja Salobir;Peter Maček

  • Isolation and characterization of three lethal and hemolytic toxins from the sea anemone Actinia equina L.

    Peter Maček;Drago Lebez

  • Pore Formation by Equinatoxin II, a Eukaryotic Protein Toxin, Occurs by Induction of Nonlamellar Lipid Structures

    Gregor Anderluh;Mauro Dalla Serra;Gabriella Viero;Graziano Guella

  • A novel mechanism of pore formation: membrane penetration by the N-terminal amphipathic region of equinatoxin.

    Petra Malovrh;Gabriella Viero;Mauro Dalla Serra;Zdravko Podlesek

  • Cloning, Sequencing, and Expression of Equinatoxin II

    Gregor Anderluh;Jože Pungerčar;Borut Štrukelj;Peter Maček

  • Polypeptide cytolytic toxins from sea anemones (Actiniaria)

    Peter Maček

  • Pleurotus and Agrocybe hemolysins, new proteins hypothetically involved in fungal fruiting

    Sabina Berne;Igor Križaj;Franc Pohleven;Tom Turk

  • Mechanism of action of equinatoxin II, a cytolysin from the sea anemone Actinia equina L. belonging to the family of actinoporins

    Peter Maček;Giovanna Belmonte;Cecilia Pederzolli;Gianfranco Menestrina

  • Pore Formation by Equinatoxin, a Eukaryotic Pore-forming Toxin, Requires a Flexible N-terminal Region and a Stable β-Sandwich *

    Katarina Kristan;Zdravko Podlesek;Vesna Hojnik;Ion Gutiérrez-Aguirre;Ion Gutiérrez-Aguirre

  • Pore formation by actinoporins, cytolysins from sea anemones ☆

    Nejc Rojko;Mauro Dalla Serra;Peter Maček;Gregor Anderluh

  • Sterol and pH Interdependence in the Binding, Oligomerization, and Pore Formation of Listeriolysin O†

    Andrej Bavdek;Nelson O Gekara;Dragan Priselac;Ion Gutiérrez Aguirre

  • Primary and secondary structure of a pore-forming toxin from the sea anemone, Actinia equina L., and its association with lipid vesicles

    Belmonte G;Menestrina G;Pederzolli C;Krizaj I

  • Cysteine-scanning mutagenesis of an eukaryotic pore-forming toxin from sea anemone: topology in lipid membranes.

    Gregor Anderluh;Ariana Barlič;Zdravko Podlesek;Peter Maček

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregor Anderluh
Gregor Anderluh University of Ljubljana
Gianfranco Menestrina
Gianfranco Menestrina National Research Council (CNR)
Mauro Dalla Serra
Mauro Dalla Serra Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche - CNR
Jeremy H. Lakey
Jeremy H. Lakey Newcastle University
Borut Štrukelj
Borut Štrukelj University of Ljubljana
Graziano Guella
Graziano Guella University of Trento
Robert Zorec
Robert Zorec University of Ljubljana
Dušan Turk
Dušan Turk Jožef Stefan Institute
Tigran V. Chalikian
Tigran V. Chalikian University of Toronto
Igor Muševič
Igor Muševič Jožef Stefan Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary careers that blend science with other fields. For those interested in law-related roles, exploring an online criminal justice associate degree programs can offer foundational knowledge applicable in forensic science or regulatory compliance positions.

Another complementary path is pursuing a paralegal studies associate degree. This equips graduates with legal expertise beneficial in intellectual property issues related to chemical patents and pharmaceutical regulations.

For those inclined toward the pharmaceutical industry, understanding how much do drug reps make sheds light on career opportunities that leverage chemical knowledge in sales and outreach roles. These positions often require strong communication skills alongside a scientific background.

Additionally, aspiring healthcare professionals can learn the steps to become a pharmacist, which involves advanced chemistry expertise critical for drug formulation and patient care. This pathway highlights the direct impact chemistry graduates can have in improving public health.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Maček

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles