World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gianfranco Menestrina

Gianfranco Menestrina

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
6997
World Ranking
15389
National Ranking
550

Gianfranco Menestrina publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gianfranco Menestrina sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 112 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Gianfranco Menestrina D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gianfranco Menestrina sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gianfranco Menestrina is affiliated with the National Research Council (CNR) in Italy. This association places them within a prominent national institution dedicated to scientific and technological research and innovation.

Although there is no detailed record of publications or specific research topics available, their activity within the CNR suggests involvement in advanced scientific research aligned with institutional objectives. The absence of listed papers, co-authors, and frequent publication venues limits the visibility of their distinct research contributions.

There is no available information regarding frequent co-authors or research collaborators, which might indicate either a solo research approach or incomplete data on collaboration networks.

Similarly, no book publications have been recorded under their name, pointing to a focus on other forms of scientific dissemination or research outputs.

The absence of listed main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work restricts the ability to outline specific scientific areas or themes central to their research agenda.

There are no awards or honors documented for Gianfranco Menestrina, so no specific recognitions can be attributed at this time.

Best Publications

  • Ionic channels formed by Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin: Voltage-dependent inhibition by divalent and trivalent cations

    Gianfranco Menestrina

  • Membrane damage by hemolytic viruses, toxins, complement, and other cytotoxic agents. A common mechanism blocked by divalent cations.

    C L Bashford;G M Alder;G Menestrina;K J Micklem

  • Effects of lipid composition on membrane permeabilization by sticholysin I and II, two cytolysins of the sea anemone Stichodactyla helianthus.

    Carlos Alvarez Valcarcel;Mauro Dalla Serra;Cristina Potrich;Ivonne Bernhart

  • Pore formation by the sea anemone cytolysin equinatoxin II in red blood cells and model lipid membranes.

    Giovanna Belmonte;Cecilia Pederzolli;Peter Maček;Gianfranco Menestrina

  • Mechanism of membrane permeabilization by sticholysin I, a cytolysin isolated from the venom of the sea anemone Stichodactyla helianthus

    Mayra Tejuca;Mauro Dalla Serra;Mercedes Ferreras;Maria E. Lanio

  • Anionic phospholipids are involved in membrane association of FtsY and stimulate its GTPase activity.

    E. de Leeuw;K. te Kaat;C. Moser;G. Menestrina

  • Ion channels and bacterial infection: the case of β-barrel pore-forming protein toxins of Staphylococcus aureus

    G Menestrina;M Dalla Serra;M Comai;M Coraiola

  • Voltage-dependent channel formation by rods of helical polypeptides.

    Gianfranco Menestrina;Klaus-Peter Voges;Günther Jung;Günther Boheim

  • Mode of action of β-barrel pore-forming toxins of the staphylococcal α-hemolysin family

    Gianfranco Menestrina;Mauro Dalla Serra;Gilles Prévost

  • Pore Formation by Equinatoxin II, a Eukaryotic Protein Toxin, Occurs by Induction of Nonlamellar Lipid Structures

    Gregor Anderluh;Mauro Dalla Serra;Gabriella Viero;Graziano Guella

  • A cytolytic δ-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis forms cation-selective channels in planar lipid bilayers

    Barbara H. Knowles;Michael R. Blatt;Mark Tester;Jane M. Horsnell

  • A novel mechanism of pore formation: membrane penetration by the N-terminal amphipathic region of equinatoxin.

    Petra Malovrh;Gabriella Viero;Mauro Dalla Serra;Zdravko Podlesek

  • Mechanism of action of equinatoxin II, a cytolysin from the sea anemone Actinia equina L. belonging to the family of actinoporins

    Peter Maček;Giovanna Belmonte;Cecilia Pederzolli;Gianfranco Menestrina

  • Metal binding in amyloid beta-peptides shows intra- and inter-peptide coordination modes.

    Francesco Stellato;Gianfranco Menestrina;Mauro Dalla Serra;Cristina Potrich

  • Escherichia coli haemolysin forms voltage-dependent ion channels in lipid membranes.

    Gianfranco Menestrina;Nigel Mackman;Ian Barry Holland;Sucharit Bhakdi

  • Sizing the radius of the pore formed in erythrocytes and lipid vesicles by the toxin sticholysin I from the sea anemone Stichodactyla helianthus.

    M. Tejuca;M. Dalla Serra;C. Potrich;C. Alvarez

  • Crystal Structure of Leucotoxin S Component NEW INSIGHT INTO THE STAPHYLOCOCCAL β-BARREL PORE-FORMING TOXINS

    Valérie Guillet;Pierre Roblin;Sandra Werner;Manuela Coraiola

  • Primary and secondary structure of a pore-forming toxin from the sea anemone, Actinia equina L., and its association with lipid vesicles

    Belmonte G;Menestrina G;Pederzolli C;Krizaj I

  • Cysteine-scanning mutagenesis of an eukaryotic pore-forming toxin from sea anemone: topology in lipid membranes.

    Gregor Anderluh;Ariana Barlič;Zdravko Podlesek;Peter Maček

  • The interaction of lipodepsipeptide toxins from Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae with biological and model membranes: a comparison of syringotoxin, syringomycin, and two syringopeptins.

    Dalla Serra M;Fagiuoli G;Nordera P;Bernhart I

Frequent Co-Authors

Mauro Dalla Serra
Mauro Dalla Serra Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche - CNR
Peter Maček
Peter Maček University of Ljubljana
Gilles Prévost
Gilles Prévost University of Strasbourg
Gregor Anderluh
Gregor Anderluh University of Ljubljana
Vincenzo Fogliano
Vincenzo Fogliano Wageningen University & Research
Sucharit Bhakdi
Sucharit Bhakdi Kiel University
Graziano Guella
Graziano Guella University of Trento
Lionel Mourey
Lionel Mourey Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Nigel Mackman
Nigel Mackman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Franco Quadrifoglio
Franco Quadrifoglio University of Udine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths, including forensic science. For those interested in applying chemical knowledge to criminal investigations, exploring a forensic science career can be a rewarding path. It combines analytical skills with legal procedures, providing an exciting and impactful profession.

Many students opt for online education to balance flexibility and quality. Understanding the cost of criminal justice degree programs is crucial when planning your studies, as tuition and fees vary widely and affect long-term investment decisions.

Additionally, earning an online criminal justice associate degree programs offers a practical foundation for those aspiring to work in legal and investigative fields. These programs provide essential knowledge and skills that complement a chemistry background, especially in roles related to law enforcement and public safety.

For those interested in the legal side of science, exploring degrees for paralegals can open up alternative career options. Paralegals with a strong science background are in demand for their ability to handle technical documents and support litigation involving scientific matters.

Best Scientists Citing Gianfranco Menestrina