World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
12140
World Ranking
10380
National Ranking
9

Gregor Anderluh publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregor Anderluh sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 259 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Gregor Anderluh D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregor Anderluh sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Gregor Anderluh is affiliated with the University of Ljubljana in Slovenia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

The subfields of study in which Anderluh is most active include Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Genetics, Immunology, and Biomedical Engineering.

The main topics covered by their research focus on:

  • Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
  • Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety

Gregor Anderluh has published frequently in several scientific venues including:

  • GigaScience
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Science Advances
  • Nature Communications
  • Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Modern venomics-Current insights, novel methods, and future perspectives in biological and applied animal venom research" (2022, GigaScience)
  • "SMN-primed ribosomes modulate the translation of transcripts related to spinal muscular atrophy" (2020, Nature Cell Biology)
  • "Biological Nanopores: Engineering on Demand" (2021, Life)
  • "Structure and mechanism of bactericidal mammalian perforin-2, an ancient agent of innate immunity" (2020, Science Advances)
  • "The molecular mechanisms of listeriolysin O-induced lipid membrane damage" (2021, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes)

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Marjetka Podobnik
  • Neža Omersa
  • Gašper Šolinc
  • Maria Vittoria Modica
  • Saša Aden

Gregor Anderluh has been recognized by being named a member of Academia Europaea in 2017 and a member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO).

Best Publications

  • Comparative genomics reveals high biological diversity and specific adaptations in the industrially and medically important fungal genus Aspergillus

    Ronald P. de Vries;Robert Riley;Ad Wiebenga;Guillermo Aguilar-Osorio

  • Cytolytic peptide and protein toxins from sea anemones (Anthozoa: Actiniaria).

    Gregor Anderluh;Peter Maček

  • Surface plasmon resonance in protein-membrane interactions

    Mojca Beseničar;Peter Maček;Jeremy H. Lakey;Gregor Anderluh

  • DNA-guided assembly of biosynthetic pathways promotes improved catalytic efficiency

    Robert J. Conrado;Gabriel C. Wu;Jason T. Boock;Hansen Xu

  • A common toxin fold mediates microbial attack and plant defense

    Christian Ottmann;Borries Luberacki;Isabell Küfner;Wolfgang Koch

  • Crystal Structure of the Soluble Form of Equinatoxin II, a Pore-Forming Toxin from the Sea Anemone Actinia equina

    Alekos Athanasiadis;Gregor Anderluh;Peter Maček;Dušan Turk

  • Two-step membrane binding by equinatoxin II, a pore-forming toxin from the sea anemone, involves an exposed aromatic cluster and a flexible helix

    Qi Hong;Ion Gutiérrez-Aguirre;Ariana Barlič;Petra Malovrh

  • Eudicot plant-specific sphingolipids determine host selectivity of microbial NLP cytolysins

    Tea Lenarčič;Isabell Albert;Hannah Böhm;Vesna Hodnik

  • Molecular Determinants of Sphingomyelin Specificity of a Eukaryotic Pore-forming Toxin *

    Biserka Bakrač;Ion Gutiérrez-Aguirre;Zdravko Podlesek;Andreas F.-P. Sonnen

  • Structure-based discovery of substituted 4,5'-bithiazoles as novel DNA gyrase inhibitors.

    Matjaž Brvar;Andrej Perdih;Miha Renko;Gregor Anderluh

  • Molecular mechanism of pore formation by actinoporins.

    Katarina Črnigoj Kristan;Gabriella Viero;Mauro Dalla Serra;Peter Maček

  • Solution structure of the eukaryotic pore-forming cytolysin equinatoxin II: implications for pore formation.

    Mark G Hinds;Wei Zhang;Gregor Anderluh;Poul Erik Hansen

  • Disparate proteins use similar architectures to damage membranes.

    Gregor Anderluh;Jeremy H. Lakey

  • Pore Formation by Equinatoxin II, a Eukaryotic Protein Toxin, Occurs by Induction of Nonlamellar Lipid Structures

    Gregor Anderluh;Mauro Dalla Serra;Gabriella Viero;Graziano Guella

  • A novel mechanism of pore formation: membrane penetration by the N-terminal amphipathic region of equinatoxin.

    Petra Malovrh;Gabriella Viero;Mauro Dalla Serra;Zdravko Podlesek

  • Membrane pore formation at protein–lipid interfaces

    Robert J.C. Gilbert;Mauro Dalla Serra;Christopher J. Froelich;Mark I. Wallace

  • Cloning, Sequencing, and Expression of Equinatoxin II

    Gregor Anderluh;Jože Pungerčar;Borut Štrukelj;Peter Maček

  • Toxin detection by surface plasmon resonance.

    Vesna Hodnik;Gregor Anderluh

  • Equinatoxin II Permeabilizing Activity Depends on the Presence of Sphingomyelin and Lipid Phase Coexistence

    Peter Schön;Ana J. García-Sáez;Petra Malovrh;Kirsten Bacia

  • Additional file 8: of Comparative genomics reveals high biological diversity and specific adaptations in the industrially and medically important fungal genus Aspergillus

    Ronald de Vries;Robert Riley;Ad Wiebenga;Guillermo Aguilar-Osorio

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Maček
Peter Maček University of Ljubljana
Mauro Dalla Serra
Mauro Dalla Serra Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche - CNR
Jeremy H. Lakey
Jeremy H. Lakey Newcastle University
Robert J. C. Gilbert
Robert J. C. Gilbert University of Oxford
Bernard Henrissat
Bernard Henrissat Technical University of Denmark
Claudio Scazzocchio
Claudio Scazzocchio Imperial College London
Alla Lapidus
Alla Lapidus Saint Petersburg State University
Erika Lindquist
Erika Lindquist United States Department of Energy
Kerrie Barry
Kerrie Barry United States Department of Energy
Igor V. Grigoriev
Igor V. Grigoriev Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a variety of dynamic careers in healthcare, research, and data management. Many students explore pathways such as medical billing, coding, or health information management either as primary career choices or as supplementary skills.

For those interested in healthcare data, comparing ccs vs cpc certifications can help clarify which credential aligns better with your career goals. Understanding the differences in cost, job roles, and salary prospects between these certifications is crucial.

If you are curious about the earning potential, check out typical medical coding jobs salary to see how the field rewards different levels of education and experience. The medical coding job outlook also remains strong, making it a promising option for those seeking job stability and flexibility.

Students aiming for leadership or data management roles should consider a health information management online degree, which can provide affordable and flexible training for advancing your career. With these resources, you can find the best pathway to fit your interests and professional plans.

Best Scientists Citing Gregor Anderluh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles