World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 74 19320 18138 776 742 519 24214

Angelo Branzi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Angelo Branzi between 1972 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Angelo Branzi published across 46 years, from 1972 to 2017, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2004. 1 of the 539 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2004. 1972: 3 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 6 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 5 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 26 publications 2002: 24 publications 2003: 35 publications 2004: 56 publications 2005: 47 publications 2006: 32 publications 2007: 38 publications 2008: 43 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication
1972 2017

539 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Angelo Branzi: publications per year, 1972 to 2017
Year Publications
1972 3
1973 2
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 2
1978 2
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 6
1988 6
1989 1
1990 5
1991 4
1992 6
1993 11
1994 8
1995 10
1996 3
1997 6
1998 11
1999 14
2000 13
2001 26
2002 24
2003 35
2004 56
2005 47
2006 32
2007 38
2008 43
2009 21
2010 23
2011 23
2012 17
2013 29
2014 2
2015 1
2016 0
2017 1
Total 539
Download as CSV

Angelo Branzi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelo Branzi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 519 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 519
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Angelo Branzi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelo Branzi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574 74
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Angelo Branzi is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy. The available data does not include specific details about their research papers, making it difficult to outline a detailed publication record or research contributions. However, their professional association with a prominent Italian university provides context for their academic involvement.

No information is recorded about frequent co-authors or common publication venues linked to their research activities. Similarly, there are no records of book publications or awards connected to their name in the provided data.

There is also no detailed data regarding the main fields of study, subfields, or specific topics that characterize their scientific contributions. This limits the possibility to specify particular areas of expertise or research focus.

Due to the lack of cited publications, co-authors, awards, or research topics, the profile centers exclusively on their affiliation at the University of Bologna, which is a notable institution in Italy known for its contributions across various academic disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Sildenafil citrate therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

    Nazzareno Galiè;Hossein A. Ghofrani;Adam Torbicki;Robyn J. Barst

  • Fluvastatin for prevention of cardiac events following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

    Patrick W. J. C. Serruys;Pim de Feyter;Carlos Macaya;Norbert Kokott

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology

    Claudio Rapezzi;Elena Biagini;Angelo Branzi

  • Noninvasive Etiologic Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis Using 99mTc-3,3-Diphosphono-1,2-Propanodicarboxylic Acid Scintigraphy

    Enrica Perugini;Pier Luigi Guidalotti;Fabrizio Salvi;Robin M.T. Cooke

  • A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Nazzareno Galiè;Alessandra Manes;Luca Negro;Massimiliano Palazzini

  • Systemic Cardiac Amyloidoses Disease Profiles and Clinical Courses of the 3 Main Types

    Claudio Rapezzi;Giampaolo Merlini;Candida C. Quarta;Letizia Riva

  • The endothelin system in pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Nazzareno Galié;Alessandra Manes;Angelo Branzi

  • Transthyretin-related amyloidoses and the heart: a clinical overview

    Claudio Rapezzi;Candida Cristina Quarta;Letizia Riva;Simone Longhi

  • A randomized placebo-controlled trial of fluvastatin for prevention of restenosis after successful coronary balloon angioplasty; final results of the fluvastatin angiographic restenosis (FLARE) trial.

    P W Serruys;D P Foley;G Jackson;H Bonnier

  • Left Superior Vena Cava Persistence in Patients Undergoing Pacemaker or Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: A 10-Year Experience

    Mauro Biffi;Giuseppe Boriani;Lorenzo Frabetti;Gabriele Bronzetti

  • Wide spectrum of presentation and variable outcomes of isolated left ventricular non-compaction

    C Lofiego;E Biagini;F Pasquale;M Ferlito

  • Current era survival of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease: a comparison between clinical subgroups

    Alessandra Manes;Massimiliano Palazzini;Enri Leci;Maria Letizia Bacchi Reggiani

  • Survival Implication of Left Ventricular End-Systolic Diameter in Mitral Regurgitation Due to Flail Leaflets: A Long-Term Follow-Up Multicenter Study

    Christophe Tribouilloy;Francesco Grigioni;Jean François Avierinos;Andrea Barbieri

  • Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Associated with Congenital Systemic-to-Pulmonary Shunts and Eisenmenger’s Syndrome

    Nazzareno Galie;Alessandra Manes;Massimiliano Palazzini;Luca Negro

  • Comparison between coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis (the Bologna Registry).

    Tullio Palmerini;Antonio Marzocchi;Cinzia Marrozzini;Paolo Ortolani

  • Prognosis of asymptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.

    P Spirito;C Rapezzi;C Autore;P Bruzzi

  • Antiproliferative effect of sildenafil on human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells

    Benedetta Tantini;Alessandra Manes;Emanuela Fiumana;Carla Pignatti

  • Dilated-Hypokinetic Evolution of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Prevalence, Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prognostic Implications in Pediatric and Adult Patients

    Elena Biagini;Fabio Coccolo;Marinella Ferlito;Enrica Perugini

  • Usefulness and limitations of 99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid scintigraphy in the aetiological diagnosis of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy

    Claudio Rapezzi;Candida Cristina Quarta;Pier Luigi Guidalotti;Simone Longhi

  • Non-invasive evaluation of the myocardial substrate of cardiac amyloidosis by gadolinium cardiac magnetic resonance

    Enrica Perugini;Claudio Rapezzi;Tommaso Piva;Ornella Leone

Frequent Co-Authors

Giuseppe Boriani
Giuseppe Boriani University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Claudio Rapezzi
Claudio Rapezzi University of Ferrara
Nazzareno Galiè
Nazzareno Galiè University of Bologna
Alessandra Ferlini
Alessandra Ferlini University of Ferrara
Domenico Lio
Domenico Lio University of Palermo
Tiziana Lazzarotto
Tiziana Lazzarotto University of Bologna
Silvana Grandi
Silvana Grandi University of Bologna
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Maarten L. Simoons
Maarten L. Simoons Erasmus University Rotterdam
Don Poldermans
Don Poldermans Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always require taking the traditional medical school route. Online degrees and alternative healthcare programs offer accessible and flexible options for aspiring professionals. For registered nurses, affordable rn to bsn programs can provide a cost-effective way to advance qualifications and open the door to additional career opportunities.

Those from non-nursing backgrounds or career changers can consider direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors. These accelerated pathways enable students to quickly transition into advanced nursing roles, even without a prior nursing degree.

Students seeking a more accessible entry point into healthcare may explore the easiest nursing programs to get into, which often have more flexible admission criteria and help reduce common barriers to starting a medical career.

Alternatively, those interested in the administrative side can look into medical billing and coding schools with financial aid. These programs allow students to quickly enter the growing field of healthcare administration with the support of financial aid options.

Best Scientists Citing Angelo Branzi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles