World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marius M. Hoeper

Marius M. Hoeper

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
126
Citations
88099
World Ranking
2878
National Ranking
150

Marius M. Hoeper publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marius M. Hoeper sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 728 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Marius M. Hoeper D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marius M. Hoeper sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 126 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marius M. Hoeper is affiliated with Hannover Medical School in Germany and has made significant contributions in the fields of medicine, with a focus on pulmonary and respiratory medicine and cardiology. Their research output includes over 600 publications, covering a range of topics related primarily to pulmonary hypertension and cardiovascular medicine.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine

Within medicine, they have concentrated extensively on subfields such as:

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Epidemiology

The core topics that characterize Marius M. Hoeper's work are:

  • Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Vascular Anomalies and Treatments
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Marius M. Hoeper has published extensively in notable journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • European Respiratory Journal
  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Some of their recent significant papers include:

  • Phase 3 Trial of Sotatercept for Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension, 2022, European Heart Journal
  • 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension, 2022, European Respiratory Journal
  • ERS Statement on Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension, 2020, European Respiratory Journal
  • Sotatercept for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine

Throughout their career, Marius M. Hoeper has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani
  • Karen M. Olsson
  • Stephan Rosenkranz
  • Ekkehard Grünig
  • Marc Humbert

Best Publications

  • 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT).

    Nazzareno Galiè;Marc Humbert;Jean-Luc Vachiery;Simon Gibbs

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), endorsed by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT)

    Galiè N;Hoeper Mm;Humbert M;Torbicki A

  • Inhaled iloprost for severe pulmonary hypertension.

    Horst Olschewski;Gerald Simonneau;Nazzareno Galiè;Timothy Higenbottam

  • [2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension].

    Nazzareno Galiè;Marc Humbert;Jean-Luc Vachiery;Simon Gibbs

  • Definitions and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension

    Marius M Hoeper;Harm Jan Bogaard;Robin Condliffe;Robert Frantz

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension

    Marius M. Hoeper;Marc Humbert;Adam Torbicki;Jean-Luc Vachiery

  • Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. The Task Force on Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Nazzareno Galiè;Adam Torbicki;Robyn Barst;Philippe Dartevelle

  • Riociguat for the Treatment of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

    Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani;Andrea M D'Armini;Friedrich Grimminger;Marius M Hoeper

  • Diagnosis and Assessment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

    David B. Badesch;Hunter C. Champion;Miguel Angel Gomez Sanchez;Marius M. Hoeper

  • Treatment of patients with mildly symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension with bosentan (EARLY study): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial

    N Galiè;LJ Rubin;MM Hoeper;P Jansa

  • Initial Use of Ambrisentan plus Tadalafil in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

    Nazzareno Galiè;Joan A. Barberà;Adaani E. Frost;Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani

  • Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH) Results From an International Prospective Registry

    Joanna Pepke-Zaba;Marion Delcroix;Irene Lang;Eckhard Mayer

  • Selexipag for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

    Olivier Sitbon;Richard Channick;Kelly M Chin;Aline Frey

  • Exercise and Respiratory Training Improve Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients With Severe Chronic Pulmonary Hypertension

    Derliz Mereles;Nicola Ehlken;Sandra Kreuscher;Stefanie Ghofrani

  • A global view of pulmonary hypertension

    Marius M Hoeper;Marc Humbert;Rogerio Souza;Majdy Idrees

  • Effects of beraprost sodium, an oral prostacyclin analogue, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Nazzareno Galie;Marc Humbert;Jean-Luc Vachiery;Carmine Dario Vizza

  • Long-Term Treatment of Primary Pulmonary Hypertension with Aerosolized Iloprost, a Prostacyclin Analogue

    Marius M. Hoeper;Michael Schwarze;Stefan Ehlerding;Angelika Adler-Schuermeyer

  • Special article2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension

    Nazzareno Galiè;Marc Humbert;Jean-Luc Vachiery;Simon Gibbs

  • 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension - web addenda

    Nazzareno Galiè;Marc Humbert;Jean-Luc Vachiery;Simon Gibbs

  • Riociguat for the Treatment of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH): 1-Year Results from the CHEST-2 Long-term Extension Study

    Gùrald Simonneau;Andrea D'Armini;Hossein Ghofrani;Friedrich Grimminger

Frequent Co-Authors

Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani
Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani University of Giessen
Gérald Simonneau
Gérald Simonneau University of Paris-Saclay
Tobias Welte
Tobias Welte University of Hannover
Stephan Rosenkranz
Stephan Rosenkranz University of Cologne
Nazzareno Galiè
Nazzareno Galiè University of Bologna
Marc Humbert
Marc Humbert University of Paris-Saclay
Lewis J. Rubin
Lewis J. Rubin University of California, San Diego
Victor F. Tapson
Victor F. Tapson Duke University
Axel Haverich
Axel Haverich Hannover Medical School
Horst Olschewski
Horst Olschewski Medical University of Graz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering medicine in the USA, there are numerous online degree options and alternative health career pathways worth exploring. If a traditional MD route isn’t your perfect fit, these online programs offer flexibility and strong opportunities in healthcare.

An increasingly popular area is pharmacy, with several accredited pharmacy school online programs providing a path to a PharmD. Those interested in digital health infrastructure can consider health information technology programs online, which focus on managing and protecting electronic medical records—a growing need in the healthcare field.

For students seeking faster entry points into the workforce, the cheapest medical coding certification online can open doors to administrative roles in clinics and hospitals. Nursing professionals can advance their careers by enrolling in one of the cheapest online np programs, enabling them to practice at a higher level and even prescribe medications.

These online degrees can help you build a rewarding healthcare career, whether your strengths are clinical, administrative, or technological.

Best Scientists Citing Marius M. Hoeper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles