World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
56
Citations
8815
World Ranking
2908
National Ranking
154

Md. Mazharul Haque publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Md. Mazharul Haque sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 181 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Md. Mazharul Haque D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Md. Mazharul Haque sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Severity of driver injury and vehicle damage in traffic crashes at intersections: a Bayesian hierarchical analysis.

    Helai Huang;Hoong Chor Chin;Md. Mazharul Haque

  • Understanding the impacts of mobile phone distraction on driving performance: A systematic review

    Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios;Md. Mazharul Haque;Mark King;Simon Washington

  • A methodological framework for benchmarking smart transport cities

    Ashim Kumar Debnath;Hoong Chor Chin;Md. Mazharul Haque;Belinda Yuen

  • A systematic mapping review of surrogate safety assessment using traffic conflict techniques.

    Ashutosh Arun;Mazharul Haque;Ashish Bhaskar;Simon Washington

  • A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations

    Md. Mazharul Haque;Simon Washington

  • A game theory-based approach for modelling mandatory lane-changing behaviour in a connected environment

    Yasir Ali;Zuduo Zheng;Md. Mazharul Haque;Meng Wang

  • Sustainable, safe, smart—three key elements of Singapore’s evolving transport policies

    Md. Mazharul Haque;Hoong Chor Chin;Ashim Kumar Debnath

  • The impact of mobile phone distraction on the braking behaviour of young drivers: A hazard-based duration model

    Md. Mazharul Haque;Simon Washington

  • Modeling fault among motorcyclists involved in crashes

    M Mazharul Haque;Hoong Chor Chin;Helai L Huang

  • Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.

    Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios;Md. Mazharul Haque;Mark King;Simon Washington

  • A systematic review of traffic conflict-based safety measures with a focus on application context

    Ashutosh Arun;Md. Mazharul Haque;Simon Washington;Tarek Sayed

  • Risk factors of mobile phone use while driving in Queensland: prevalence, attitudes, crash risk perception, and task-management strategies

    Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios;Mark King;Md. Mazharul Haque;Simon Washington

  • Applying Bayesian hierarchical models to examine motorcycle crashes at signalized intersections.

    Md. Mazharul Haque;Hoong Chor Chin;Helai Huang

  • The impact of the connected environment on driving behavior and safety: a driving simulator study

    Yasir Ali;Anshuman Sharma;Md. Mazharul Haque;Zuduo Zheng

  • Impact of mobile phone use on car-following behaviour of young drivers

    Mohammad Saifuzzaman;Md. Mazharul Haque;Zuduo Zheng;Simon Washington

  • Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Approaches in Identifying Crash Hot Spots: Naive Ranking, Empirical Bayes, and Full Bayes Methods

    Helai Huang;Hoong Chor Chin;Md. Mazharul Haque

  • Revisiting the Task–Capability Interface model for incorporating human factors into car-following models

    Mohammad Saifuzzaman;Zuduo Zheng;Md. Mazharul Haque;Simon Washington

  • Assessing traffic disturbance, efficiency, and safety of the mixed traffic flow of connected vehicles and traditional vehicles by considering human factors

    Anshuman Sharma;Anshuman Sharma;Zuduo Zheng;Jiwon Kim;Ashish Bhaskar

  • An investigation on multi-vehicle motorcycle crashes using log-linear models

    Md. Mazharul Haque;Hoong Chor Chin;Ashim Kumar Debnath

  • A comparison between simulated and field-measured conflicts for safety assessment of signalized intersections in Australia

    Yanyong Guo;Mohamed Essa;Tarek Sayed;Md. Mazharul Haque

  • Connectivity’s impact on mandatory lane-changing behaviour: Evidences from a driving simulator study

    Yasir Ali;Zuduo Zheng;Md. Mazharul Haque

  • Applying quantile regression for modeling equivalent property damage only crashes to identify accident blackspots

    Simon Washington;Md. Mazharul Haque;Jutaek Oh;Dongmin Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Washington
Simon Washington Queensland University of Technology
Zuduo Zheng
Zuduo Zheng University of Queensland
Ashish Bhaskar
Ashish Bhaskar Queensland University of Technology
Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios
Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios Delft University of Technology
Helai Huang
Helai Huang Central South University
Tarek Sayed
Tarek Sayed University of British Columbia
Linda Ng Boyle
Linda Ng Boyle University of Washington
Michiel C.J. Bliemer
Michiel C.J. Bliemer University of Sydney
Carlo Giacomo Prato
Carlo Giacomo Prato University of Queensland
Barry C. Watson
Barry C. Watson Queensland University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Engineering and Technology can open doors to a wide range of online educational opportunities across the USA. Many universities now offer college classes online, allowing students to fit studies around personal and professional commitments with flexibility and convenience.

In addition to core engineering programs, students can enhance their career options with related fields. For those interested in business, online finance degree programs deliver foundational skills in financial management, a valuable asset in tech industries. Ambitious graduates can also consider the fastest mba programs to quickly gain leadership expertise and accelerate their career trajectory.

Technology professionals may also find value in specialized concentrations, such as legal studies related to intellectual property or compliance. Enrolling in an accelerated paralegal program can equip tech experts with the knowledge needed for legal support roles within engineering firms or software companies.

With so many flexible online pathways, students can strategically enhance their skill sets, transition into new roles, or fast-track career advancement while balancing life’s other demands.

Best Scientists Citing Md. Mazharul Haque

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles