World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 33 9384 9025 2641 2437 154 5085

Linda Ng Boyle publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda Ng Boyle between 2001 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda Ng Boyle published across 24 years, from 2001 to 2024, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2017. 9 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2017. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 10 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 3 publications
2001 2024

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda Ng Boyle: publications per year, 2001 to 2024
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 10
2007 8
2008 8
2009 10
2010 5
2011 8
2012 13
2013 13
2014 8
2015 13
2016 13
2017 16
2018 6
2019 7
2020 10
2021 2
2022 11
2023 6
2024 3
Total 175
Download as CSV

Linda Ng Boyle publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Ng Boyle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 154 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457 154
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda Ng Boyle D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Ng Boyle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189 33
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda Ng Boyle is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of engineering and psychology, with a significant focus on traffic and road safety, human-automation interaction and safety, and safety warnings and signage.

Their publication record includes studies on topics such as traumatic brain injury research, older adults driving studies, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, and transportation and mobility innovations.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Linda Ng Boyle include:

  • "Orbit-to-ground framework to decode and predict biosignature patterns in terrestrial analogues," 2023, Nature Astronomy
  • "Cognitive Impairment and Driving Skills in Youth After Concussion," 2022, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • "Empirical analysis of commercial vehicle dwell times around freight-attracting urban buildings in downtown Seattle," 2021, Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
  • "Comparisons of physical exposure between workers harvesting apples on mobile orchard platforms and ladders, part 2: Repetitive upper arm motions," 2020, Applied Ergonomics
  • "Driving behavior at midblock crosswalks with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons: Hidden Markov model approach using naturalistic data," 2021, Accident Analysis & Prevention

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Linda Ng Boyle include:

  • Yilun Xing
  • Beth E. Ebel
  • Mayuree Binjolkar
  • John D. Lee
  • Emily Kroshus

Linda Ng Boyle publishes regularly in several venues, often contributing multiple works to the following:

  • Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
  • Applied Ergonomics
  • Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
  • Nature Astronomy

Their research also covers various subfields such as social psychology, safety, risk, reliability and quality, emergency medicine, automotive engineering, and building and construction. These areas underscore an interdisciplinary approach that integrates human factors with engineering and safety sciences.

Best Publications

  • Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation

    Mahtab Ghazizadeh;John D. Lee;Linda Ng Boyle

  • Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers.

    Birsen Donmez;Linda Ng Boyle;John D. Lee

  • The influence of driver distraction on the severity of injuries sustained by teenage drivers and their passengers

    David M. Neyens;Linda Ng Boyle

  • The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers

    David M. Neyens;Linda Ng Boyle

  • Age-related differences in visual scanning at median-divided highway intersections in rural areas

    Shan Bao;Linda Ng Boyle

  • Driver stress as influenced by driving maneuvers and roadway conditions

    John D. Hill;Linda Ng Boyle

  • Visual attention in driving: the effects of cognitive load and visual disruption

    Ying-Chiao Lee;John D. Lee;Linda Ng Boyle

  • Impact of traveler advisory systems on driving speed: some new evidence

    Linda Ng Boyle;Fred Mannering

  • The Impact of Distraction Mitigation Strategies on Driving Performance

    Birsen Donmez;Linda Ng Boyle;John D. Lee

  • Mitigating driver distraction with retrospective and concurrent feedback.

    Birsen Donmez;Linda Ng Boyle;John D. Lee

  • Augmenting the Technology Acceptance Model with Trust: Commercial Drivers’ Attitudes towards Monitoring and Feedback:

    Mahtab Ghazizadeh;Yiyun Peng;John D. Lee;Linda Ng Boyle

  • Drivers' attitudes toward imperfect distraction mitigation strategies

    Birsen Donmez;Linda Ng Boyle;John D. Lee;Daniel V. McGehee

  • Whole body vibration exposures in bus drivers: A comparison between a high-floor coach and a low-floor city bus

    Ornwipa Thamsuwan;Ryan P. Blood;Randal P. Ching;Linda Boyle

  • Mangrove ecosystem services and the potential for carbon revenue programmes in Solomon Islands

    Kimberley Warren-Rhodes;Anne-Maree Schwarz;Linda Ng Boyle;Joelle Albert

  • Using driving simulators to assess driving safety.

    Linda Ng Boyle;John D. Lee

  • Driver's lane keeping ability with eyes off road: Insights from a naturalistic study.

    Yiyun Peng;Linda Ng Boyle;Shauna L. Hallmark

  • Differences in Off-Road Glances: Effects on Young Drivers’ Performance

    Birsen Donmez;Birsen Donmez;Birsen Donmez;Linda Ng Boyle;Linda Ng Boyle;Linda Ng Boyle;John D. Lee;John D. Lee;John D. Lee

  • Drivers' Understanding of Adaptive Cruise Control Limitations

    David Alexander Dickie;Linda Ng Boyle

  • Physical ecology of hypolithic communities in the central Namib Desert: The role of fog, rain, rock habitat, and light

    Kimberley A. Warren-Rhodes;Kimberley A. Warren-Rhodes;Christopher P. McKay;Linda Ng Boyle;Michael R. Wing

  • Driver Behavior in Road Tunnels: Association with Driver Stress and Performance

    Erika E. Miller;Linda Ng Boyle

  • In UX We Trust: Investigation of Aesthetics and Usability of Driver-Vehicle Interfaces and Their Impact on the Perception of Automated Driving

    Anna-Katharina Frison;Philipp Wintersberger;Andreas Riener;Clemens Schartmüller

Frequent Co-Authors

John D. Lee
John D. Lee University of Wisconsin–Madison
Richard G. Ellenbogen
Richard G. Ellenbogen University of Washington
Frederick P. Rivara
Frederick P. Rivara University of Washington
Md. Mazharul Haque
Md. Mazharul Haque Queensland University of Technology
Simon Washington
Simon Washington Queensland University of Technology
Wendy Ju
Wendy Ju Cornell University
Shamsi T. Iqbal
Shamsi T. Iqbal Microsoft (United States)
Peter Johnson
Peter Johnson University of Southampton
Thomas D. Koepsell
Thomas D. Koepsell University of Washington
Orit Shaer
Orit Shaer Wellesley College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Engineering and Technology opens the door to many interdisciplinary opportunities. With the rise of online learning, students can now access flexible programs that complement their technical background and accelerate professional growth.

For those seeking business skills alongside engineering expertise, a 1 year online mba no gmat program offers a fast, cost-effective route to leadership roles, often without demanding standardized test scores.

Project management is another valuable skill set. A cheap project management degree online may help you advance to management positions within tech companies, construction, or manufacturing sectors.

Engineering professionals might also benefit from diversification, such as a online degree real estate if interested in property development, infrastructure, or facilities management.

Lastly, merging technology with creativity, a ui ux design bachelor's degree online can enable engineers to work in the fast-growing digital design space, designing innovative user experiences for software and devices.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Ng Boyle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles