World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
45
Citations
10165
World Ranking
347
National Ranking
200

Yan Jin publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yan Jin sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 130 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Yan Jin D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yan Jin sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yan Jin is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States and specializes in research within the social sciences, focusing primarily on areas such as sociology, political science, and communication. Their scholarly contributions span several interconnected fields including social psychology, literature and literary theory, and strategy and management.

Their research centers predominantly on public relations and crisis communication, misinformation and its impacts, and disaster management and resilience. Additional areas include media influence on health, risk perception and management, communication in education and healthcare, and general media studies and communication.

Yan Jin has published frequently in several academic journals. The most common venues include the Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Public Relations Review, Journal of Communication Management, Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, and Health Communication.

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Yan Jin include:

  • The Effects of Corrective Communication and Employee Backup on the Effectiveness of Fighting Crisis Misinformation, 2020, Public Relations Review
  • How shades of truth and age affect responses to COVID-19 (Mis)information: randomized survey experiment among WhatsApp users in UK and Brazil, 2021, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • Information vetting as a key component in social-mediated crisis communication: An exploratory study to examine the initial conceptualization, 2020, Public Relations Review
  • Telling the tale: the role of narratives in helping people respond to crises, 2020, Journal of Applied Communication Research
  • Dynamics of social corrections to peers sharing COVID-19 misinformation on WhatsApp in Brazil, 2021, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Their most frequent collaborators include Xuerong Lu, Santosh Vijaykumar, Brooke Fisher Liu, Lucinda Austin, and Sung In Choi. Collaborations with these coauthors have occurred across multiple publications, with the highest number of joint works with Xuerong Lu.

Best Publications

  • Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships

    Rowena L. Briones;Beth Kuch;Brooke Fisher Liu;Yan Jin

  • How Audiences Seek Out Crisis Information: Exploring the Social-Mediated Crisis Communication Model

    Lucinda Austin;Brooke Fisher Liu;Yan Jin

  • Examining the Role of Social Media in Effective Crisis Management: The Effects of Crisis Origin, Information Form, and Source on Publics’ Crisis Responses

    Yan Jin;Brooke Fisher Liu;Lucinda L. Austin

  • How publics respond to crisis communication strategies: The interplay of information form and source

    Brooke Fisher Liu;Lucinda L. Austin;Yan Jin

  • The Blog-Mediated Crisis Communication Model: Recommendations for Responding to Influential External Blogs

    Yan Jin;Brooke Fisher Liu

  • Ebola on Instagram and Twitter: How health organizations address the health crisis in their social media engagement

    Jeanine P.D. Guidry;Yan Jin;Caroline A. Orr;Marcus Messner

  • Social Media Use During Disasters: How Information Form and Source Influence Intended Behavioral Responses

    Brooke Fisher Liu;Julia Daisy Fraustino;Yan Jin

  • Toward a Publics-Driven, Emotion-Based Conceptualization in Crisis Communication: Unearthing Dominant Emotions in Multi-Staged Testing of the Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) Model

    Yan Jin;Augustine Pang;Glen T. Cameron

  • Seeking Formula for Misinformation Treatment in Public Health Crises: The Effects of Corrective Information Type and Source.

    Toni G L A van der Meer;Yan Jin

  • Making Sense Sensibly in Crisis Communication: How Publics’ Crisis Appraisals Influence Their Negative Emotions, Coping Strategy Preferences, and Crisis Response Acceptance

    Yan Jin

  • On pins and needles: how vaccines are portrayed on Pinterest.

    Jeanine P.D. Guidry;Kellie Carlyle;Marcus Messner;Yan Jin

  • Integrated Crisis Mapping: Toward a Publics-Based, Emotion-Driven Conceptualization in Crisis Communication

    Yan Jin;Augustine Pang;Glen T. Cameron

  • Social media use during disasters: a review of the knowledge base and gaps.

    Julia Daisy Fraustino;Brooke Liu;Yan Jin

  • Emotional Leadership as a Key Dimension of Public Relations Leadership: A National Survey of Public Relations Leaders

    Yan Jin

  • Managing Turbulence in the Blogosphere: Evaluating the Blog-Mediated Crisis Communication Model with the American Red Cross

    Brooke Fisher Liu;Yan Jin;Rowena Briones;Beth Kuch

  • The effects of public's cognitive appraisal of emotions in crises on crisis coping and strategy assessment

    Yan Jin

  • The Tendency To Tell: Understanding Publics' Communicative Responses To Crisis Information Form and Source

    Brooke Fisher Liu;Yan Jin;Lucinda L. Austin

  • How Disaster Information Form, Source, Type, and Prior Disaster Exposure Affect Public Outcomes: Jumping on the Social Media Bandwagon?

    Brooke Fisher Liu;Julia Daisy Fraustino;Yan Jin

  • Social Media and Crisis Communication

    Lucinda L. Austin;Yan Jin

  • The Effects of Threat Type and Duration on Public Relations Practitioner's Cognitive, Affective, and Conative Responses in Crisis Situations

    Yan Jin;Glen T. Cameron

  • Examining the interplay of an organization's prior reputation, CEO's visibility, and immediate response to a crisis

    Judy VanSlyke Turk;Yan Jin;Sean Stewart;Jeesun Kim

  • The role of emotions in crisis responses: Inaugural test of the integrated crisis mapping (ICM) model

    Yan Jin;Augustine Pang;Glen T. Cameron

  • Contingency theory: Strategic management of conflict in public relations

    Glen T. Cameron;A. Pang;Yan Jin

  • Going head to head: Content analysis of high profile conflicts as played out in the press

    Jae-Hwa Shin;I-Huei Cheng;Yan Jin;Glen T. Cameron

  • Contingency theory of strategic conflict management: Directions for the practice of crisis communication from a decade of theory development, discovery and dialogue

    Augustine Pang;Yan Jin;Glen T. Cameron

  • Examining Publics' Crisis Responses According to Different Shades of Anger and Sympathy

    Yan Jin

  • Explicating crisis coping in crisis communication

    Yan Jin;Soo Yeon Hong

  • Strategic communication of hope and anger: A case of Duke University's conflict management with multiple publics

    Yan Jin;Sun-A Park;María E. Len-Ríos

  • Do We Stand on Common Ground? A Threat Appraisal Model for Terror Alerts Issued by the Department of Homeland Security

    Augustine Pang;Yan Jin;Glen T. Cameron

Frequent Co-Authors

Brooke Fisher Liu
Brooke Fisher Liu University of Maryland, College Park
Glen T. Cameron
Glen T. Cameron University of Missouri
Claudia Pagliari
Claudia Pagliari University of Edinburgh
Itai Himelboim
Itai Himelboim University of Georgia
Gregory R. Hancock
Gregory R. Hancock University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens the door to diverse academic and professional opportunities. Many students combine this major with allied fields to broaden their skill set and career options. For example, pairing Political Science with an mathematics bachelor degree online can strengthen your analytical skills, making you more competitive for policy research and data-driven roles.

If you are interested in public policy related to the environment, consider exploring high-paying jobs with environmental science degree. This pathway connects well with environmental policy and advocacy work. Similarly, a library science degree online can be the foundation for roles in public information, archives, and government libraries.

Many Political Science graduates are also drawn to the social sciences and humanities. If you're interested in historical perspectives on politics, you might want to explore different history degree types. These related online programs further diversify your academic background and boost your qualifications for a range of careers in government, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Yan Jin

Trending Scientists