World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
7544
World Ranking
6173
National Ranking
2952

Kenneth A. Lachlan publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth A. Lachlan sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 143 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Kenneth A. Lachlan D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth A. Lachlan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth A. Lachlan is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the social sciences, with a focus on areas including sociology and political science, communication, social psychology, literature and literary theory, and education.

The scholar has made significant contributions to topics such as:

  • Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Risk Perception and Management
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Media Studies and Communication

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Lachlan's notable coauthors include Patric R. Spence, Christine Gilbert, Emily Hutter, Xialing Lin, and Renee Kaufmann. These collaborations have supported a productive research output in various academic venues.

The most common publication venues for the researcher's work are:

  • Communication Studies
  • Journal of Emergency Management
  • Progress in Disaster Science
  • Communication Education
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Selected recent papers by Kenneth A. Lachlan include:

  • "From what I've heard, this is bad: An examination of Americans' source preferences and information seeking during the COVID-19 pandemic" (2021) published in Progress in Disaster Science
  • "COVID-19 Echo Chambers: Examining the Impact of Conservative and Liberal News Sources on Risk Perception and Response" (2021) published in Health Security

Other relevant papers linked to their research themes include:

  • "Needing to know about the crisis back home: Disaster information seeking and disaster media effects following the 2015 Nepal earthquake among Nepalis living outside of Nepal" (2020) published in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
  • "The climate change risk perception model in the United States: A replication study" (2023) published in Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • "Listen up, I've done this before: The impact of self-disclosure on source credibility and risk message responses" (2020) published in Progress in Disaster Science

The researcher's work spans an interdisciplinary blend of social sciences and communication, strongly emphasizing public response and media influences during crises and disasters. This body of work provides insight into how information is sought and processed during emergencies, the role of media in shaping risk perceptions, and the effects of misinformation on public health and safety.

Best Publications

  • Video Game Uses and Gratifications as Predicators of Use and Game Preference.

    John L. Sherry;Bradley S. Greenberg;Kristen Lucas;Ken Lachlan

  • Orientations to Video Games Among Gender and Age Groups

    Bradley S. Greenberg;John Sherry;Kenneth Lachlan;Kristen Lucas

  • Portrayals of Overweight and Obese Individuals on Commercial Television

    Bradley S. Greenberg;Matthew Eastin;Linda Hofschire;Ken Lachlan

  • Popular video games: Quantifying the presentation of violence and its context

    Stacy L. Smith;Kenneth A. Lachlan;Ron Tamborini

  • Crisis Communication, Race, and Natural Disasters

    Patric R. Spence;Kenneth A. Lachlan;Donyale R. Griffin

  • Social media and crisis management

    Kenneth A. Lachlan;Patric R. Spence;Xialing Lin;Kristy Najarian

  • Variability in Twitter Content Across the Stages of a Natural Disaster: Implications for Crisis Communication

    Patric R. Spence;Kenneth A. Lachlan;Xialing Lin;Maria del Greco

  • Social media and credibility indicators: The effect of influence cues

    Xialing Lin;Patric R. Spence;Kenneth A. Lachlan

  • Violent Virtual Video Games and Hostile Thoughts

    Ron Tamborini;Matthew S. Eastin;Paul Skalski;Kenneth Lachlan

  • Crisis communication, learning and responding

    Xialing Lin;Patric R. Spence;Timothy L. Sellnow;Kenneth A. Lachlan

  • Exploring extreme events on social media

    Xialing Lin;Kenneth A. Lachlan;Patric R. Spence

  • Expressions of risk awareness and concern through Twitter: On the utility of using the medium as an indication of audience needs

    Kenneth A. Lachlan;Patric R. Spence;Xialing Lin

  • Media use and information needs of the disabled during a natural disaster

    Patric R Spence;Kenneth Lachlan;Jennifer A Burke;Matthew W. Seeger

  • Screaming into the Wind: Examining the Volume and Content of Tweets Associated with Hurricane Sandy

    Kenneth A. Lachlan;Patric R. Spence;Xialing Lin;Maria Del Greco

  • Straight talk about communication research methods

    Christine S. Davis;Heather Powell Gallardo;Kenneth A. Lachlan

  • Terrorist attacks and uncertainty reduction: Media use after September 11

    Kenneth A. Lachlan;Patric R. Spence;Matthew Seeger

  • ADJUSTING TO UNCERTAINTY: COPING STRATEGIES AMONG THE DISPLACED AFTER HURRICANE KATRINA

    Patric R. Spence;Kenneth A. Lachlan;Jennifer M. Burke

  • Where the Gates Matter Less: Ethnicity and Perceived Source Credibility in Social Media Health Messages

    Patric R. Spence;Kenneth A. Lachlan;David Westerman;Stephen A. Spates

  • The Influence of Morality Subcultures on the Acceptance and Appeal of Violence

    Ron Tamborini;Allison Eden;Nicholas David Bowman;Matthew Grizzard

  • Comparing Survey and Diary Measures of Internet and Traditional Media Use

    Bradley S. Greenberg;Matthew S. Eastin;Paul Skalski;Len Cooper

Frequent Co-Authors

Patric R. Spence
Patric R. Spence University of Central Florida
Timothy L. Sellnow
Timothy L. Sellnow University of Central Florida
Ron Tamborini
Ron Tamborini Michigan State University
Bradley S. Greenberg
Bradley S. Greenberg Michigan State University
Matthew S. Eastin
Matthew S. Eastin The University of Texas at Austin
Matthew W. Seeger
Matthew W. Seeger Wayne State University
Marina Krcmar
Marina Krcmar Wake Forest University
Barbara Wilson
Barbara Wilson University of Virginia
Timothy R. Levine
Timothy R. Levine University of Oklahoma
Kelly D. Brownell
Kelly D. Brownell Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse academic and professional avenues. Many students seek flexible education options to balance studies with other commitments. One great choice is enrolling in one year online masters programs, which help students fast-track their qualifications and enter the workforce sooner.

Interested in completing your bachelor's degree quickly? Accelerated online programs are designed for those eager to graduate faster while maintaining educational quality, making them ideal for career changers or motivated learners.

Many careers in social services require specialized accreditation. Prospective social workers can find value in most affordable online msw programs, which help reduce tuition costs while preparing graduates for impactful roles. Likewise, those interested in behavioral analysis can explore bcba school online options for remote, cost-effective pathways to certification.

These online degrees support a variety of professional goals, offering affordability, flexibility, and accelerated completion for students eager to advance in Social Sciences and Humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth A. Lachlan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles