World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
5884
World Ranking
8895
National Ranking
4726

Robert A. Carels publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Carels sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert A. Carels D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Carels sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert A. Carels is affiliated with East Carolina University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on topics related to obesity, eating disorders, psychological aspects of weight stigma, and health practices.

Their notable recent papers include:

  • "Weight stigma and media: An examination of the effect of advertising campaigns on weight bias, internalized weight bias, self-esteem, body image, and affect" (2020, Body Image)
  • "A brief pilot self-compassion intervention for women with overweight/obesity and internalized weight bias: Feasibility, acceptability, and future directions" (2021, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science)
  • "Comparing stigmatizing attitudes toward anorexia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder, and subthreshold eating behaviors in college students" (2020, Eating Behaviors)
  • "Experienced weight stigma, internalized weight bias, and maladaptive eating patterns among heterosexual and sexual minority individuals" (2022, Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity)
  • "Associations between husbands' weight bias and related concerns and husbands' and wives' psychological and relationship outcomes" (2020, Body Image)

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Damon L. Swift
  • Joshua E. McGee
  • Joseph A. Houmard
  • Walter J. Pories
  • Laura E. Matarese

Robert A. Carels publishes regularly in several academic journals, with notable venues being:

  • Stigma and Health
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • Circulation
  • Body Image
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Their scholarly work is situated mainly within the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Within these broad areas, they have contributed to specialized subfields including Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Epidemiology.

The central topics in their research encompass:

  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Humor Studies and Applications

Best Publications

  • Using motivational interviewing as a supplement to obesity treatment: a stepped-care approach.

    Robert A. Carels;Lynn Darby;Holly M. Cacciapaglia;Krista Konrad

  • Food addiction in adults seeking weight loss treatment. Implications for psychosocial health and weight loss.

    Jacob M. Burmeister;Nova Hinman;Afton Koball;Debra A. Hoffmann

  • The association between disease severity, functional status, depression and daily quality of life in congestive heart failure patients.

    Robert A Carels

  • Individual differences in food perceptions and calorie estimation: an examination of dieting status, weight, and gender.

    Robert A. Carels;Krista Konrad;Jessica Harper

  • Overt weight stigma, psychological distress and weight loss treatment outcomes.

    Carissa B. Wott;Robert A. Carels

  • Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) study intervention: rationale and design.

    L. Berkman;A. Jaffe;R. Carney;S. Czajkowski

  • Qualitative perceptions and caloric estimations of healthy and unhealthy foods by behavioral weight loss participants.

    Robert A. Carels;Jessica Harper;Krista Konrad

  • The Sanctification of the Body and Behavioral Health Patterns of College Students

    Annette Mahoney;Robert A. Carels;Kenneth I. Pargament;Amy B. Wachholtz

  • Implicit, explicit, and internalized weight bias and psychosocial maladjustment among treatment-seeking adults.

    R.A. Carels;C.B. Wott;K.M. Young;A. Gumble

  • The relationship between self-monitoring, outcome expectancies, difficulties with eating and exercise, and physical activity and weight loss treatment outcomes.

    Robert A Carels;Lynn A Darby;Sofia Rydin;Olivia M Douglass

  • An ecological momentary assessment of relapse crises in dieting.

    Robert A. Carels;Olivia M. Douglass;Holly M. Cacciapaglia;William H. O'Brien

  • Cognitions in marriage : The relationship between standards and attributions

    Donald H. Baucom;Norman Epstein;Anthony D. Daiuto;Robert A. Carels

  • Support in marriage: Factors associated with on-line perceptions of support helpfulness.

    Robert A. Carels;Donald H. Baucom

  • Ecological momentary assessment of temptation and lapse in dieting.

    Robert A Carels;Jody Hoffman;Allison Collins;Alana C Raber

  • Reducing cardiovascular risk factors in postmenopausal women through a lifestyle change intervention.

    Robert Albert Carels;Lynn A. Darby;Holly M. Cacciapaglia;Olivia M. Douglass

  • Weight bias and weight loss treatment outcomes in treatment-seeking adults.

    Robert A. Carels;Kathleen M. Young;Carissa B. Wott;Jessica Harper

  • Internalized weight bias: ratings of the self, normal weight, and obese individuals and psychological maladjustment

    Robert A. Carels;J. Burmeister;M. W. Oehlhof;N. Hinman

  • A randomized trial comparing two approaches to weight loss: differences in weight loss maintenance.

    Robert A Carels;Jacob M Burmeister;Afton M Koball;Marissa W Oehlhof

  • The early identification of poor treatment outcome in a women's weight loss program

    Robert A Carels;Holly M Cacciapaglia;Olivia M Douglass;Sofia Rydin

  • Psychosocial influences on blood pressure during daily life.

    Robert A Carels;Andrew Sherwood;James A Blumenthal

  • Psychosocial functioning and physical symptoms in heart failure patients: a within-individual approach.

    Robert A Carels;Dara Musher-Eizenman;Holly Cacciapaglia;Carlos I Pérez-Benı́tez

  • Associations between evaluation anxiety, cognitive interference and performance on working memory tasks

    Brent Coy;William H. O'Brien;Tracy Tabaczynski;Jebediah Northern

  • The Effects of Reality Television on Weight Bias: An Examination of The Biggest Loser

    Sarah E. Domoff;Nova G. Hinman;Afton M. Koball;Amy Storfer-Isser

  • RESEARCH: "The Sanctification of the Body and Behavioral Health Patterns of College Students"

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. Blumenthal
James A. Blumenthal Duke University
Andrew Sherwood
Andrew Sherwood Duke University
Joseph A. Houmard
Joseph A. Houmard East Carolina University
Walter J. Pories
Walter J. Pories East Carolina University
Donald H. Baucom
Donald H. Baucom University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Dara R. Musher-Eizenman
Dara R. Musher-Eizenman Bowling Green State University
Petra H.M. Peeters
Petra H.M. Peeters Utrecht University
Antonia Trichopoulou
Antonia Trichopoulou National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Anne Tjønneland
Anne Tjønneland University of Copenhagen
Anke Hinney
Anke Hinney University of Duisburg-Essen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a wide range of online programs and career opportunities. Students can choose from flexible online options that cater to different interests and professional goals, from counseling and clinical psychology to research and organizational roles.

Many universities deliver online psychology degrees that match the quality of traditional programs. For example, those interested in studying in Texas can explore popular psychology programs in Fort Worth. If Ohio is your preference, consider the popular psychology degrees in Kent for both undergraduate and graduate options.

In Nevada, the most popular psychology degree programs in Las Vegas offer distinctive specializations, while those in Tennessee can examine the most popular psychology degree programs in Nashville. These programs often provide online pathways, making them accessible to students nationwide.

With a psychology degree, graduates can pursue roles such as mental health counselors, human resource specialists, social workers, or continue to advanced psychology research. As demand for psychological expertise grows, exploring related online degrees and career pathways ensures you can find a program and career direction that suits your personal and professional ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Robert A. Carels

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles