World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew M. Burg

Matthew M. Burg

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4354 4025 2424 2191 223 14478

Matthew M. Burg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew M. Burg between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew M. Burg published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2017. 31 of the 341 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2017. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 15 publications
1979 2025

341 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew M. Burg: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 2
1985 0
1986 1
1987 2
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 4
1996 1
1997 2
1998 3
1999 4
2000 2
2001 3
2002 2
2003 6
2004 7
2005 7
2006 16
2007 11
2008 12
2009 13
2010 19
2011 13
2012 14
2013 18
2014 9
2015 2
2016 12
2017 23
2018 8
2019 14
2020 20
2021 23
2022 16
2023 15
2024 16
2025 15
Total 341
Download as CSV

Matthew M. Burg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew M. Burg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 223 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 223
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew M. Burg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew M. Burg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew M. Burg is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and specializes primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research encompasses a substantial focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, with additional contributions in Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Surgery, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their recent scientific work addresses diverse aspects of cardiovascular health, psychological factors, and related clinical measurements. Notable papers include:

  • Strengthening the Pillars of Cardiovascular Health: Psychological Health is a Crucial Component (2024) published in Circulation
  • Vigorous Exercise in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (2023) published in JAMA Cardiology
  • The Perceived Stress Scale as a Measure of Stress: Decomposing Score Variance in Longitudinal Behavioral Medicine Studies (2023) published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • Reliability of Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements and Correlation With Left Ventricular Mass (2020) published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Baseline Characteristics from the Women Veterans Cohort Study: Gender Differences and Similarities in Health and Healthcare Utilization (2021) published in Journal of Women's Health

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include Allison E. Gaffey, Cynthia Brandt, Sally G. Haskell, Lori A. Bastian, and Lindsey Rosman.

Their publication record features frequent contributions to prominent venues such as:

  • Circulation (14 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (7 publications)
  • Health Psychology (5 publications)
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (4 publications)
  • Current Cardiology Reports (4 publications)

The scientist's work covers major research topics including:

  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena

Best Publications

  • Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Randomized Trial.

    Lisa F Berkman;James Blumenthal;Matthew Burg;Robert M Carney

  • Social support, type A behavior, and coronary artery disease.

    James A. Blumenthal;Matthew M. Burg;John Barefoot;Redford B. Williams

  • Effects of Antidepressant Medication on Morbidity and Mortality in Depressed Patients After Myocardial Infarction

    C. Barr Taylor;Marston E. Youngblood;Diane Catellier;Richard C. Veith

  • Emotional and Physical Precipitants of Ventricular Arrhythmia

    Rachel Lampert;Tammy Joska;Matthew M. Burg;William P. Batsford

  • Enhanced Depression Care for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Persistent Depressive Symptoms: Coronary Psychosocial Evaluation Studies Randomized Controlled Trial

    Karina W. Davidson;Nina Rieckmann;Lynn Clemow;Joseph E. Schwartz

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder and risk for coronary heart disease: A meta-analytic review

    Donald E. Edmondson;Ian M. Kronish;Jonathan A. Shaffer;Louise Falzon

  • Depression and late mortality after myocardial infarction in the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) study

    Robert M. Carney;James A. Blumenthal;Kenneth E. Freedland;Marston Youngblood

  • Presurgical depression predicts medical morbidity 6 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

    Matthew M. Burg;M. Cristina Benedetto;Roberta Rosenberg;Robert Soufer

  • Destabilizing Effects of Mental Stress on Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

    Rachel Lampert;Diwaker Jain;Matthew M. Burg;William P. Batsford

  • Widowhood and mortality: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.

    Eran Shor;David J. Roelfs;Misty Curreli;Lynn Clemow

  • Role of behavioral and psychological factors in mental stress-induced silent left ventricular dysfunction in coronary artery disease☆

    Matthew M. Burg;Diwakar Jain;Robert Soufer;Robert Soufer;Robert D. Kerns;Robert D. Kerns

  • Families and Health: the Negative Side of Social Ties

    Matthew M. Burg;Teresa E. Seeman

  • Negative Emotion and Coronary Heart Disease A Review

    Brian C. Sirois;Matthew M. Burg

  • Association of Anhedonia With Recurrent Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Mortality 1 Year After Acute Coronary Syndrome

    Karina W. Davidson;Matthew M. Burg;Ian M. Kronish;Daichi Shimbo

  • Centralized, Stepped, Patient Preference–Based Treatment for Patients With Post–Acute Coronary Syndrome Depression: CODIACS Vanguard Randomized Controlled Trial

    Karina W. Davidson;J. Thomas Bigger;Matthew M. Burg;Robert M. Carney

  • Exercise, depression, and mortality after myocardial infarction in the ENRICHD trial.

    James A. Blumenthal;Michael A. Babyak;Robert M. Carney;Marc Huber

  • Prognostic Implications of Mental Stress-Induced Silent Loft Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris

    Diwakar Jain;Matthew Burg;Matthew Burg;Robert Soufer;Robert Soufer;Barry L. Zaret;Barry L. Zaret

  • The misdiagnosis of hypertension: the role of patient anxiety.

    Gbenga Ogedegbe;Thomas G. Pickering;Lynn Clemow;William Chaplin

  • Spirituality, religion, and clinical outcomes in patients recovering from an acute myocardial infarction.

    James A. Blumenthal;Michael A. Babyak;Gail Ironson;Carl Thoresen

  • Social support and prognosis in patients at increased psychosocial risk recovering from myocardial infarction.

    Heather S. Lett;James A. Blumenthal;Michael A. Babyak;Diane J. Catellier

  • Low perceived social support and post-myocardial infarction prognosis in the enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease clinical trial: the effects of treatment.

    Matthew M. Burg;John Barefoot;Lisa Berkman;Diane J. Catellier

  • Type D personality predicts clinical events after myocardial infarction, above and beyond disease severity and depression.

    Elisabeth J. Martens;Floortje Mols;Matthew M. Burg;Johan Denollet

  • Anxiety is a better predictor of platelet reactivity in coronary artery disease patients than depression

    M. Urooj Zafar;Manuel Paz-Yepes;Daichi Shimbo;Gemma Vilahur

Frequent Co-Authors

Karina W. Davidson
Karina W. Davidson Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Joseph E. Schwartz
Joseph E. Schwartz Stony Brook University
William F. Chaplin
William F. Chaplin St. John's University
James Dziura
James Dziura Yale University
Kenneth E. Freedland
Kenneth E. Freedland Washington University in St. Louis
Susan M. Czajkowski
Susan M. Czajkowski National Institutes of Health
Barry L. Zaret
Barry L. Zaret Yale University
Robert M. Carney
Robert M. Carney Washington University in St. Louis
James A. Blumenthal
James A. Blumenthal Duke University
William Gerin
William Gerin Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to various careers, including marriage and family therapy (MFT). This specialized pathway requires different certification requirements depending on your location. For example, you can find detailed guidelines on how to become an mft in Nashville, as well as insights into New Orleans mft certification requirements.

In metropolitan regions, the process may differ. If you are aiming to practice in New York, understanding how to become an mft in New York City is crucial. Similarly, those interested in New Jersey should check the specific Newark mft certification requirements.

Many universities now offer online psychology degrees that fulfill core educational criteria for licensure in multiple states. Online programs provide flexible learning options and can be a stepping-stone toward licensure in marriage and family therapy, counseling, or other mental health fields. Before enrolling, always verify that your chosen degree aligns with your state’s specific licensing requirements and supports your long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew M. Burg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles