World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew M. Burg

Matthew M. Burg

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
14478
World Ranking
4354
National Ranking
2424

Matthew M. Burg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew M. Burg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 223 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Matthew M. Burg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew M. Burg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew M. Burg is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and specializes primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research encompasses a substantial focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, with additional contributions in Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Surgery, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their recent scientific work addresses diverse aspects of cardiovascular health, psychological factors, and related clinical measurements. Notable papers include:

  • Strengthening the Pillars of Cardiovascular Health: Psychological Health is a Crucial Component (2024) published in Circulation
  • Vigorous Exercise in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (2023) published in JAMA Cardiology
  • The Perceived Stress Scale as a Measure of Stress: Decomposing Score Variance in Longitudinal Behavioral Medicine Studies (2023) published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • Reliability of Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements and Correlation With Left Ventricular Mass (2020) published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Baseline Characteristics from the Women Veterans Cohort Study: Gender Differences and Similarities in Health and Healthcare Utilization (2021) published in Journal of Women's Health

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include Allison E. Gaffey, Cynthia Brandt, Sally G. Haskell, Lori A. Bastian, and Lindsey Rosman.

Their publication record features frequent contributions to prominent venues such as:

  • Circulation (14 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (7 publications)
  • Health Psychology (5 publications)
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (4 publications)
  • Current Cardiology Reports (4 publications)

The scientist's work covers major research topics including:

  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena

Best Publications

  • Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Randomized Trial.

    Lisa F Berkman;James Blumenthal;Matthew Burg;Robert M Carney

  • Social support, type A behavior, and coronary artery disease.

    James A. Blumenthal;Matthew M. Burg;John Barefoot;Redford B. Williams

  • Effects of Antidepressant Medication on Morbidity and Mortality in Depressed Patients After Myocardial Infarction

    C. Barr Taylor;Marston E. Youngblood;Diane Catellier;Richard C. Veith

  • Emotional and Physical Precipitants of Ventricular Arrhythmia

    Rachel Lampert;Tammy Joska;Matthew M. Burg;William P. Batsford

  • Enhanced Depression Care for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Persistent Depressive Symptoms: Coronary Psychosocial Evaluation Studies Randomized Controlled Trial

    Karina W. Davidson;Nina Rieckmann;Lynn Clemow;Joseph E. Schwartz

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder and risk for coronary heart disease: A meta-analytic review

    Donald E. Edmondson;Ian M. Kronish;Jonathan A. Shaffer;Louise Falzon

  • Depression and late mortality after myocardial infarction in the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) study

    Robert M. Carney;James A. Blumenthal;Kenneth E. Freedland;Marston Youngblood

  • Presurgical depression predicts medical morbidity 6 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

    Matthew M. Burg;M. Cristina Benedetto;Roberta Rosenberg;Robert Soufer

  • Destabilizing Effects of Mental Stress on Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

    Rachel Lampert;Diwaker Jain;Matthew M. Burg;William P. Batsford

  • Widowhood and mortality: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.

    Eran Shor;David J. Roelfs;Misty Curreli;Lynn Clemow

  • Role of behavioral and psychological factors in mental stress-induced silent left ventricular dysfunction in coronary artery disease☆

    Matthew M. Burg;Diwakar Jain;Robert Soufer;Robert Soufer;Robert D. Kerns;Robert D. Kerns

  • Families and Health: the Negative Side of Social Ties

    Matthew M. Burg;Teresa E. Seeman

  • Negative Emotion and Coronary Heart Disease A Review

    Brian C. Sirois;Matthew M. Burg

  • Association of Anhedonia With Recurrent Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Mortality 1 Year After Acute Coronary Syndrome

    Karina W. Davidson;Matthew M. Burg;Ian M. Kronish;Daichi Shimbo

  • Centralized, Stepped, Patient Preference–Based Treatment for Patients With Post–Acute Coronary Syndrome Depression: CODIACS Vanguard Randomized Controlled Trial

    Karina W. Davidson;J. Thomas Bigger;Matthew M. Burg;Robert M. Carney

  • Exercise, depression, and mortality after myocardial infarction in the ENRICHD trial.

    James A. Blumenthal;Michael A. Babyak;Robert M. Carney;Marc Huber

  • Prognostic Implications of Mental Stress-Induced Silent Loft Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris

    Diwakar Jain;Matthew Burg;Matthew Burg;Robert Soufer;Robert Soufer;Barry L. Zaret;Barry L. Zaret

  • The misdiagnosis of hypertension: the role of patient anxiety.

    Gbenga Ogedegbe;Thomas G. Pickering;Lynn Clemow;William Chaplin

  • Spirituality, religion, and clinical outcomes in patients recovering from an acute myocardial infarction.

    James A. Blumenthal;Michael A. Babyak;Gail Ironson;Carl Thoresen

  • Social support and prognosis in patients at increased psychosocial risk recovering from myocardial infarction.

    Heather S. Lett;James A. Blumenthal;Michael A. Babyak;Diane J. Catellier

  • Low perceived social support and post-myocardial infarction prognosis in the enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease clinical trial: the effects of treatment.

    Matthew M. Burg;John Barefoot;Lisa Berkman;Diane J. Catellier

  • Type D personality predicts clinical events after myocardial infarction, above and beyond disease severity and depression.

    Elisabeth J. Martens;Floortje Mols;Matthew M. Burg;Johan Denollet

  • Anxiety is a better predictor of platelet reactivity in coronary artery disease patients than depression

    M. Urooj Zafar;Manuel Paz-Yepes;Daichi Shimbo;Gemma Vilahur

Frequent Co-Authors

Karina W. Davidson
Karina W. Davidson Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Joseph E. Schwartz
Joseph E. Schwartz Stony Brook University
William F. Chaplin
William F. Chaplin St. John's University
James Dziura
James Dziura Yale University
Kenneth E. Freedland
Kenneth E. Freedland Washington University in St. Louis
Susan M. Czajkowski
Susan M. Czajkowski National Institutes of Health
Barry L. Zaret
Barry L. Zaret Yale University
Robert M. Carney
Robert M. Carney Washington University in St. Louis
James A. Blumenthal
James A. Blumenthal Duke University
William Gerin
William Gerin Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to various careers, including marriage and family therapy (MFT). This specialized pathway requires different certification requirements depending on your location. For example, you can find detailed guidelines on how to become an mft in Nashville, as well as insights into New Orleans mft certification requirements.

In metropolitan regions, the process may differ. If you are aiming to practice in New York, understanding how to become an mft in New York City is crucial. Similarly, those interested in New Jersey should check the specific Newark mft certification requirements.

Many universities now offer online psychology degrees that fulfill core educational criteria for licensure in multiple states. Online programs provide flexible learning options and can be a stepping-stone toward licensure in marriage and family therapy, counseling, or other mental health fields. Before enrolling, always verify that your chosen degree aligns with your state’s specific licensing requirements and supports your long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew M. Burg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles