World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 88 1033 57 390 29299
Medicine 87 13576 515 412 29911

Johan Denollet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Johan Denollet between 1981 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Johan Denollet published across 43 years, from 1981 to 2023, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2013. 2 of the 444 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2013. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 32 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 39 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 33 publications 2013: 45 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication
1981 2023

444 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Johan Denollet: publications per year, 1981 to 2023
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 2
1993 3
1994 1
1995 4
1996 1
1997 2
1998 5
1999 2
2000 2
2001 5
2002 8
2003 5
2004 8
2005 7
2006 20
2007 32
2008 27
2009 39
2010 30
2011 30
2012 33
2013 45
2014 14
2015 18
2016 20
2017 21
2018 22
2019 15
2020 11
2021 6
2022 1
2023 1
Total 444
Download as CSV

Johan Denollet publications per year - data summary

  • Johan Denollet, a Psychology scholar from Tilburg University, has 444 publications recorded across 43 years, from 1981 to 2023.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2023.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 45 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981, 1982, 1988, 1991 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 43 years in the span carry no publications at all (1983, 1984, 1985, 1986 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 10.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.3 per year counting only the 36 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2019-2023) hold 34 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1995: 14 publications (0.9 per year); 1996-2010: 193 publications (12.9 per year); 2011-2023: 237 publications (18.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Johan Denollet publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johan Denollet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–390 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 390 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58 390
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Johan Denollet publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Johan Denollet, a Psychology scholar from Tilburg University, records 390 publications - the 94th percentile of the discipline.
  • 94% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Johan Denollet, and about 6% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Johan Denollet ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Johan Denollet D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johan Denollet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83 88
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Johan Denollet D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Johan Denollet, a Psychology scholar from Tilburg University, records 88 D-Index - the 91st percentile of the discipline.
  • 91% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Johan Denollet, and about 9% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Johan Denollet ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Johan Denollet was affiliated with Tilburg University in the Netherlands and contributed to research primarily in the fields of psychology and medicine. Their work focused on a range of topics that intersected behavioral and clinical psychology with cardiology and mental health.

The scientist's research spanned several main fields of study, including:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Within these fields, Denollet specialized in subfields such as:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

The main topics covered in Denollet's work included:

  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation Studies
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Denollet coauthored publications with several researchers frequently, including:

  • Nina Kupper
  • Mirela Habibović
  • Stefanie Duijndam
  • Eva Broers
  • Annemiek Karreman

Their published work appeared across various academic journals. Frequent publication venues consisted of:

  • Psychosomatic Medicine
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Acta Psychologica
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Mindfulness

Significant recent publications by Denollet included:

  • "Personalized eHealth Program for Life-style Change: Results From the 'Do Cardiac Health Advanced New Generated Ecosystem (Do CHANGE 2)' Randomized Controlled Trial" (2020, Psychosomatic Medicine)
  • "Emotion regulation in social interaction: Physiological and emotional responses associated with social inhibition" (2020, International Journal of Psychophysiology)
  • "Social inhibition and approach-avoidance tendencies towards facial expressions" (2020, Acta Psychologica)
  • "A review and conceptual model of the association of Type D personality with suicide risk" (2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research)
  • "Prevalence of anxiety and risk associated with ventricular arrhythmia in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator" (2020, International Journal of Cardiology)

Best Publications

  • DS14 : Standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and Type D personality

    Johan Denollet

  • Anxiety and Risk of Incident Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis

    Annelieke M. Roest;Elisabeth J. Martens;Peter de Jonge;Johan Denollet

  • Personality as independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with coronary heart disease

    Johan Denollet;Stanislas U. Sys;Nathalie Stroobant;Hans Rombouts

  • Type D personality: A potential risk factor refined

    Johan Denollet

  • Personality, Disease Severity, and the Risk of Long-term Cardiac Events in Patients With a Decreased Ejection Fraction After Myocardial Infarction

    Johan Denollet;Dirk L. Brutsaert

  • Inadequate Response to Treatment in Coronary Heart Disease Adverse Effects of Type D Personality and Younger Age on 5-Year Prognosis and Quality of Life

    Johan Denollet;Johan Vaes;Dirk L. Brutsaert

  • Comparing symptoms of depression and anxiety as predictors of cardiac events and increased health care consumption after myocardial infarction.

    Jacqueline J.M.H Strik;Johan Denollet;Johan Denollet;Richel Lousberg;Adriaan Honig

  • Prognostic Association of Anxiety Post Myocardial Infarction With Mortality and New Cardiac Events: A Meta-Analysis

    Annelieke M. Roest;Elisabeth J. Martens;Johan Denollet;Peter de Jonge

  • Depression and risk of mortality in people with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Fleur E. P. van Dooren;Giesje Nefs;Miranda T. Schram;Frans R. J. Verhey

  • Personality and mortality after myocardial infarction.

    Johan Denollet;Stanislas U. Sys;Dirk L. Brutsaert

  • Type D personality, cardiac events, and impaired quality of life : a review

    Susanne S. Pedersen;Johan Denollet

  • A General Propensity to Psychological Distress Affects Cardiovascular Outcomes Evidence From Research on the Type D (Distressed) Personality Profile

    Johan Denollet;Angélique A. Schiffer;Viola Spek

  • Type D personality in the general population: a systematic review of health status, mechanisms of disease, and work-related problems

    Floortje Mols;Johan Denollet

  • Aerobic interval training and continuous training equally improve aerobic exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease: the SAINTEX-CAD study.

    Viviane M. Conraads;Nele Pattyn;Catherine De Maeyer;Paul J. Beckers

  • Personality and coronary heart disease: The Type D Scale-16 (DS16)

    Johan Denollet

  • The Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long term Evaluation of Survivorship registry: Scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts

    Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse;Nicole Horevoorts;Mies van Eenbergen;Johan Denollet

  • Usefulness of type D personality in predicting five-year cardiac events above and beyond concurrent symptoms of stress in patients with coronary heart disease.

    Johan Denollet;Susanne S. Pedersen;Christiaan J. Vrints;Viviane M. Conraads

  • Sensitivity and Specificity of Observer and Self-Report Questionnaires in Major and Minor Depression Following Myocardial Infarction

    Jacqueline J. M. H. Strik;Adriaan Honig;Richel Lousberg;Johan Denollet

  • Personality and Vulnerability to Depression in Stroke Patients A 1-Year Prospective Follow-Up Study

    Ivo Aben;Johan Denollet;Richel Lousberg;Frans Verhey

  • Combined endurance-resistance training vs. endurance training in patients with chronic heart failure: a prospective randomized study.

    Paul J Beckers;Johan Denollet;Nadine M Possemiers;Floris L Wuyts

  • Negative affectivity and social inhibition in cardiovascular disease: evaluating type-D personality and its assessment using item response theory.

    Wilco H.M. Emons;Rob R. Meijer;Johan Denollet

Frequent Co-Authors

Susanne S. Pedersen
Susanne S. Pedersen University of Southern Denmark
Nina Kupper
Nina Kupper Tilburg University
Ivan Nyklíček
Ivan Nyklíček Tilburg University
Peter de Jonge
Peter de Jonge University of Groningen
Ron T. van Domburg
Ron T. van Domburg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Annelieke M. Roest
Annelieke M. Roest University of Groningen
John A. Spertus
John A. Spertus University of Missouri–Kansas City
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Frans Pouwer
Frans Pouwer University of Southern Denmark
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets Tilburg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens a wide range of possibilities, especially with the growing demand for qualified mental health professionals in the United States. Many students choose to complete online psychology degrees to gain foundational knowledge and flexibility while pursuing additional certifications or specializations.

A popular career pathway is becoming a substance abuse counselor. Each state—and sometimes individual cities—have their own requirements for certification and practice. For instance, you can learn more about Aurora substance abuse counselor certification requirements, or explore specific local guidelines such as the Austin substance abuse counselor certification requirements. If you're considering the West Coast, understanding the process of becoming a substance abuse counselor in Bakersfield is invaluable.

Similarly, on the East Coast, you'll want to be familiar with Baltimore substance abuse counselor certification requirements. These resources help students and professionals evaluate online degree programs and plan the necessary steps for successful certification and fulfilling, impactful careers in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Johan Denollet

Recently Published Articles