World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
11137
World Ranking
4059
National Ranking
2273

Samuel F. Sears publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel F. Sears sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 209 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Samuel F. Sears D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel F. Sears sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Samuel F. Sears is affiliated with East Carolina University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their scholarly work spans 229 publications in medicine, including 175 in the subfield of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their research covers several main topics, including cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies, cardiac arrhythmias and treatments, and heart failure treatment and management. Additional areas of interest include atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, cardiac health and mental health, and cardiovascular function and risk factors.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Rajasekhar Nekkanti, Connor Tripp, Scarlett Anthony, JoAnn Lindenfeld, and Akshay S. Desai. These collaborations reflect a network of engaged researchers working on related cardiovascular topics.

Samuel F. Sears has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal
  • JACC Heart Failure

Selected recent papers demonstrate a focus on heart failure management, interprofessional collaboration in healthcare, and the impact of COVID-19 on health outcomes:

  • Haemodynamic-guided management of heart failure (GUIDE-HF): a randomised controlled trial, 2021, The Lancet
  • A chain mediation model on COVID-19 symptoms and mental health outcomes in Americans, Asians and Europeans, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews about interprofessional collaboration: facilitators, barriers, and outcomes, 2022, Journal of Interprofessional Care
  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health in the two largest economies in the world: a comparison between the United States and China, 2021, Journal of Behavioral Medicine
  • Implantable Hemodynamic Monitors Improve Survival in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, 2024, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Relationship between concussion and neuropsychological performance in college football players.

    Michael W. Collins;Scott H. Grindel;Scott H. Grindel;Mark R. Lovell;Duane E. Dede

  • QUALITY OF LIFE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING OF ICD PATIENTS

    Samuel F Sears;Jamie B Conti

  • Examining the psychosocial impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a literature review.

    Sears Sf;Todaro Jf;Lewis Ts;Sotile W

  • Haemodynamic-guided management of heart failure (GUIDE-HF): a randomised controlled trial.

    JoAnn Lindenfeld;Michael R Zile;Akshay S Desai;Kunjan Bhatt

  • Depression and anxiety in adult congenital heart disease: Predictors and prevalence

    Adrienne H. Kovacs;Arwa S. Saidi;Emily A. Kuhl;Samuel F. Sears

  • Effects of group- versus home-based exercise in the treatment of obesity.

    Michael G. Perri;A. Daniel Martin;Elizabeth A. Leermakers;Samuel F. Sears

  • Strategies for Improving Maintenance of Weight Loss: Toward a continuous care model of obesity management

    Michael G Perri;Samuel F Sears;Judith E Clark

  • Educational and Psychological Interventions to Improve Outcomes for Recipients of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Their Families A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Sandra B. Dunbar;Cynthia M. Dougherty;Samuel F. Sears;Diane L. Carroll

  • Depression as a predictor for appropriate shocks among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Results from the Triggers of Ventricular Arrhythmias (TOVA) study

    William Whang;Christine M. Albert;Christine M. Albert;Samuel F. Sears;Rachel Lampert

  • Biopsychosocial experiences of adults with congenital heart disease: Review of the literature

    Adrienne H. Kovacs;Samuel F. Sears;Arwa S. Saidi

  • Measuring patient acceptance of implantable cardiac device therapy: initial psychometric investigation of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey.

    Jason L. Burns;Eva R. Serber;Stephen Keim;Samuel F. Sears

  • Understanding implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks and storms: Medical and psychosocial considerations for research and clinical care

    Samuel F. Sears;Jamie B. Conti

  • Assessing the psychosocial impact of the ICD: a national survey of implantable cardioverter defibrillator health care providers.

    Samuel F. Sears;John F. Todaro;Guido Urizar;Tara Saia Lewis

  • A chain mediation model on COVID-19 symptoms and mental health outcomes in Americans, Asians and Europeans.

    Cuiyan Wang;Agata Chudzicka-Czupala;Michael L Tee;María Inmaculada López Núñez

  • Examining a stress-coping model of burnout and depression in extension agents.

    Samuel F. Sears Jr.;Guido G. Urizar Jr.;Garret D. Evans

  • Measurement of patient fears about implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock: an initial evaluation of the Florida Shock Anxiety Scale.

    Emily A. Kuhl;Neha K. Dixit;Robyn L. Walker;Jamie B. Conti

  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and quality of life: results from the defibrillators in nonischemic cardiomyopathy treatment evaluation study.

    Rod Passman;Haris Subacius;Bernice Ruo;Andi Schaechter

  • The ICD shock and stress management program: a randomized trial of psychosocial treatment to optimize quality of life in ICD patients.

    Samuel F. Sears;Lauren D. Vazquez Sowell;Emily A. Kuhl;Adrienne H. Kovacs

  • Predictors of Quality of Life in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

    Samuel F. Sears;Tara Saia Lewis;Emily A. Kuhl;Jamie B. Conti

  • Psychological intervention following implantation of an implantable defibrillator: a review and future recommendations.

    Susanne S. Pedersen;Krista C. Van Den Broek;Samuel F. Sears

  • AHA Scientific Statement Educational and Psychological Interventions to Improve Outcomes for Recipients of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Their Families A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Cynthia M. Dougherty;Samuel F. Sears;Diane L. Carroll;Nathan E. Goldstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Susanne S. Pedersen
Susanne S. Pedersen University of Southern Denmark
Sana M. Al-Khatib
Sana M. Al-Khatib Duke University
Mina K. Chung
Mina K. Chung Cleveland Clinic
Christina S. McCrae
Christina S. McCrae University of Missouri
Clyde W. Yancy
Clyde W. Yancy Northwestern University
Bach Xuan Tran
Bach Xuan Tran Vietnam National University, Hanoi
Akshay S. Desai
Akshay S. Desai Brigham and Women's Hospital
David L. Hayes
David L. Hayes Mayo Clinic
Gregg C. Fonarow
Gregg C. Fonarow University of California, Los Angeles
Adrian F. Hernandez
Adrian F. Hernandez Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Psychology can open up a variety of fulfilling career pathways. Social work is a common next step, allowing graduates to make a direct impact in their communities. Choosing an online social work program not only adds flexibility, but it can also be cost-effective if you know where to look.

Many students are interested in affordable options. You can discover the most affordable social work degree programs in Utah if you're considering studying in the Western region. Likewise, Virginia is a popular state for those on a budget, and you can explore the cheapest social work degrees in Virginia to compare offerings.

For students who want to study in urban environments, there are also most affordable social work degree programs in Washington, D.C. With increased demand for qualified professionals, the region offers diverse opportunities. If you want to review broader options, see the latest affordable social work programs in the West for more flexibility.

Ultimately, pursuing an online degree in a field related to psychology can provide both personal and professional rewards while helping you manage costs.

Best Scientists Citing Samuel F. Sears

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles