World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jesper Hastrup Svendsen

Jesper Hastrup Svendsen

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
23219
World Ranking
17548
National Ranking
191

Jesper Hastrup Svendsen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesper Hastrup Svendsen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 545 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jesper Hastrup Svendsen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesper Hastrup Svendsen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jesper Hastrup Svendsen is affiliated with Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a strong focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. The scientist's work includes subfields such as radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, surgery, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, and genetics.

Their research topics highlight specialization in:

  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Jesper Hastrup Svendsen has contributed extensively to research articles published in several prominent venues, including:

  • European Heart Journal
  • EP Europace
  • Heart Rhythm
  • Circulation
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Recent influential papers include:

  • 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), 2024, European Heart Journal
  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy, 2021, EP Europace
  • Implantable loop recorder detection of atrial fibrillation to prevent stroke (The LOOP Study): a randomised controlled trial, 2021, The Lancet
  • A Randomized Trial of His Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing in Symptomatic HF Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block (His-Alternative), 2021, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
  • Early diagnosis and better rhythm management to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: the 8th AFNET/EHRA consensus conference, 2022, EP Europace

The scientist has frequently collaborated with other researchers, notably:

  • Søren Zöga Diederichsen
  • Lars Køber
  • Axel Brandes
  • Claus Graff
  • Ketil Haugan

Best Publications

  • Defibrillator Implantation in Patients with Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure

    Lars Køber;Jens J. Thune;Jens J. Thune;Jens C. Nielsen;Jens C. Nielsen;Jens Haarbo;Jens Haarbo

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapyDeveloped by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Michael Glikson;Jens Cosedis Nielsen;Mads Brix Kronborg;Yoav Michowitz

  • Multi-Ethnic Genome-wide Association Study for Atrial Fibrillation

    Carolina Roselli;Mark D. Chaffin;Lu Chen Weng;Lu Chen Weng;Stefanie Aeschbacher

  • Screening for Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration

    Ben Freedman;John Camm;Hugh Calkins;Jeffrey S Healey

  • Inflammation in the genesis and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation

    Mads D.M. Engelmann;Jesper Hastrup Svendsen

  • Nationwide study of sudden cardiac death in persons aged 1–35 years

    Bo Gregers Winkel;Anders Gaarsdal Holst;Juliane Theilade;Ingrid Bayer Kristensen

  • Implantable loop recorder detection of atrial fibrillation to prevent stroke (The LOOP Study): a randomised controlled trial

    Jesper H Svendsen;Jesper H Svendsen;Søren Z Diederichsen;Søren Højberg;Derk W Krieger

  • A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome

    Jens Cosedis Nielsen;Poul Erik B. Thomsen;Søren Højberg;Mogens Møller

  • Strain echocardiography improves risk prediction of ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction.

    Kristina H. Haugaa;Bjørnar L. Grenne;Christian H. Eek;Mads Ersbøll

  • Incidence and etiology of sports-related sudden cardiac death in Denmark—Implications for preparticipation screening

    Anders Gaarsdal Holst;Bo Gregers Winkel;Bo Gregers Winkel;Juliane Theilade;Juliane Theilade;Ingrid Bayer Kristensen

  • Device-detected subclinical atrial tachyarrhythmias: definition, implications and management-an European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología (SOLEACE).

    Bulent Gorenek;Jeroen Bax;Giuseppe Boriani;Shih-Ann Chen

  • Searching for Atrial Fibrillation Poststroke: A White Paper of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration

    Renate B. Schnabel;Karl Georg Haeusler;Jeffrey S. Healey;Ben Freedman

  • New population-based exome data are questioning the pathogenicity of previously cardiomyopathy-associated genetic variants.

    Charlotte Andreasen;Jonas B Nielsen;Lena Refsgaard;Anders G Holst

  • Integrating Genetic, Transcriptional, and Functional Analyses to Identify 5 Novel Genes for Atrial Fibrillation

    Moritz F. Sinner;Nathan R. Tucker;Kathryn L. Lunetta;Kouichi Ozaki

  • Risk of atrial fibrillation and stroke in rheumatoid arthritis: Danish nationwide cohort study

    Jesper Lindhardsen;Ole Ahlehoff;Gunnar Hilmar Gislason;Ole Rintek Madsen

  • P-wave duration and the risk of atrial fibrillation: Results from the Copenhagen ECG Study.

    Jonas B Nielsen;Jonas B Nielsen;Jørgen T Kühl;Adrian Pietersen;Claus Graff

  • Familial aggregation of Atrial Fibrillation – a study in Danish Twins

    Ingrid Elisabeth Christophersen;Lasse Steen Ravn;Esben Budtz-Joergensen;Aksel Skytthe

  • Lesion Dimensions During Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Left Ventricular Porcine Myocardium Impact of Ablation Site, Electrode Size, and Convective Cooling

    Helen Høgh Petersen;Xu Chen;Adrian Pietersen;Jesper Hastrup Svendsen

  • Gain of function in IKs secondary to a mutation in KCNE5 associated with atrial fibrillation

    Lasse S. Ravn;Yoshiyasu Aizawa;Guido D. Pollevick;Jacob Hofman-Bang;Jacob Hofman-Bang

  • Genetic variation in KCNA5: impact on the atrial-specific potassium current IKur in patients with lone atrial fibrillation

    Ingrid E. Christophersen;Ingrid E. Christophersen;Morten S. Olesen;Morten S. Olesen;Bo Liang;Martin N. Andersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Lars Køber
Lars Køber Copenhagen University Hospital
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Gregory Y.H. Lip University of Liverpool
Kristina H. Haugaa
Kristina H. Haugaa University of Oslo
Thor Edvardsen
Thor Edvardsen Oslo University Hospital
Michael Christiansen
Michael Christiansen Statens Serum Institut
Christian Torp-Pedersen
Christian Torp-Pedersen Aalborg University
Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Jens Cosedis Nielsen Aarhus University Hospital
Peter Riis Hansen
Peter Riis Hansen University of Copenhagen
Gunnar H. Gislason
Gunnar H. Gislason Copenhagen University Hospital
Christian Hassager
Christian Hassager University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering Medicine in the USA, it's important to know there are various online degrees and alternative career pathways in healthcare. These options often provide more flexibility and can be more affordable than traditional programs, making them accessible for working professionals or those with busy schedules.

Nursing remains one of the most popular fields for online study. Prospective nurse practitioners can explore some of the cheapest online fnp programs to advance their clinical expertise while saving on tuition. For those starting out, earning a bachelor's in nursing is made easier through the cheapest bsn programs online, which are designed to help students gain essential nursing skills and open doors to entry-level positions.

Many registered nurses are also choosing rn to bsn online bridge programs to further their education and unlock higher-paying roles. For those interested in leadership, education, or research, pursuing a phd in nursing can offer a pathway toward specialized and top-tier positions in the healthcare sector.

Exploring these related online degrees can expand your options and accelerate your healthcare career, whether you’re just beginning or seeking to advance in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Jesper Hastrup Svendsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles