World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 111 5295 4970 55 52 1178 50763

Gunnar H. Gislason publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gunnar H. Gislason between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gunnar H. Gislason published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 62.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 148 publications in 2021. 36 of the 1,377 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 148. Peak 148 publications in 2021. 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 48 publications 2013: 79 publications 2014: 62 publications 2015: 65 publications 2016: 91 publications 2017: 108 publications 2018: 115 publications 2019: 128 publications 2020: 133 publications 2021: 148 publications 2022: 116 publications 2023: 66 publications 2024: 72 publications 2025: 33 publications 2026: 3 publications
2005 2026

1,377 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gunnar H. Gislason: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 8
2006 9
2007 8
2008 12
2009 13
2010 32
2011 28
2012 48
2013 79
2014 62
2015 65
2016 91
2017 108
2018 115
2019 128
2020 133
2021 148
2022 116
2023 66
2024 72
2025 33
2026 3
Total 1,377
Download as CSV

Gunnar H. Gislason publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunnar H. Gislason sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,161–1,180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,178 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35 1,178
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gunnar H. Gislason D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunnar H. Gislason sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429 111
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gunnar H. Gislason is affiliated with Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark. Their research output spans multiple areas within medicine, with a focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • Association of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use With COVID-19 Diagnosis and Mortality, 2020, JAMA
  • Cardiovascular effects and safety of (non-aspirin) NSAIDs, 2020, Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and myocarditis or myopericarditis: population based cohort study, 2021, BMJ
  • Acute COVID-19 and the Incidence of Ischemic Stroke and Acute Myocardial Infarction, 2020, Circulation
  • Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

They frequently collaborate with several co-authors, including:

  • Christian Torp-Pedersen
  • Lars Køber
  • Emil Loldrup Fosbøl
  • Tor Biering-Sørensen
  • Morten Schou

The primary publication venues for their work are:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • EP Europace
  • Journal of the American Heart Association

Gislason's research focuses mainly on medicine, with subfields including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Surgery

The key topics of their scientific work encompass:

  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research

Best Publications

  • Validation of risk stratification schemes for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: nationwide cohort study

    Jonas Bjerring Olesen;Gregory Y H Lip;Morten Lock Hansen;Peter Riis Hansen

  • Association of National Initiatives to Improve Cardiac Arrest Management With Rates of Bystander Intervention and Patient Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

    Mads Wissenberg;Freddy K. Lippert;Fredrik Folke;Peter Weeke

  • Stroke and Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation with Chronic Kidney Disease

    Jonas Bjerring Olesen;Gregory Y H Lip;Anne-Lise Kamper;Kristine Hommel

  • Risk of bleeding with single, dual, or triple therapy with warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation.

    Morten L. Hansen;Rikke Sørensen;Mette T. Clausen;Marie Louise Fog-Petersen

  • Risk of bleeding in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with different combinations of aspirin, clopidogrel, and vitamin K antagonists in Denmark: a retrospective analysis of nationwide registry data

    Rikke Sørensen;Morten L Hansen;Steen Z Abildstrom;Steen Z Abildstrom;Anders Hvelplund

  • Diabetes Patients Requiring Glucose-Lowering Therapy and Nondiabetics With a Prior Myocardial Infarction Carry the Same Cardiovascular Risk: A Population Study of 3.3 Million People

    Tina Ken Schramm;Gunnar H. Gislason;Lars Køber;Søren Rasmussen

  • Risk of Death or Reinfarction Associated With the Use of Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors and Nonselective Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Gunnar H. Gislason;Søren Jacobsen;Jeppe N. Rasmussen;Søren Rasmussen

  • Risks of thromboembolism and bleeding with thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: A net clinical benefit analysis using a ‘real world’ nationwide cohort study

    Jonas Bjerring Olesen;Gregory Y H Lip;Jesper Lindhardsen;Deirdre A Lane

  • Bleeding After Initiation of Multiple Antithrombotic Drugs, Including Triple Therapy, in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Following Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Intervention A Nationwide Cohort Study

    Morten Lamberts;Jonas Bjerring Olesen;Martin Huth Ruwald;Carolina Malta Hansen

  • Mortality and cardiovascular risk associated with different insulin secretagogues compared with metformin in type 2 diabetes, with or without a previous myocardial infarction: a nationwide study.

    Tina Ken Schramm;Gunnar Hilmar Gislason;Allan Vaag;Jeppe Nørgaard Rasmussen

  • Psoriasis is associated with clinically significant cardiovascular risk: a Danish nationwide cohort study.

    O. Ahlehoff;G. H. Gislason;M. Charlot;C. H. Jørgensen

  • The risk of myocardial infarction in rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes mellitus: a Danish nationwide cohort study

    Jesper Lindhardsen;Ole Ahlehoff;Gunnar Hilmar Gislason;Ole Rintek Madsen

  • Duration of Treatment With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Impact on Risk of Death and Recurrent Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Cohort Study

    Anne-Marie Schjerning Olsen;Emil L. Fosbøl;Jesper Lindhardsen;Fredrik Folke

  • Oral anticoagulation and antiplatelets in atrial fibrillation patients after myocardial infarction and coronary intervention

    Morten Lamberts;Gunnar H. Gislason;Jonas Bjerring Olesen;Søren Lund Kristensen

  • Association of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use With COVID-19 Diagnosis and Mortality.

    Emil L. Fosbøl;Jawad H. Butt;Lauge Østergaard;Charlotte Andersson

  • Long-term compliance with beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and statins after acute myocardial infarction

    Gunnar H. Gislason;Jeppe N. Rasmussen;Steen Z. Abildstrøm;Niels Gadsbøll

  • The spectrum of thyroid disease and risk of new onset atrial fibrillation: a large population cohort study

    Christian Selmer;Jonas Bjerring Olesen;Morten Lock Hansen;Jesper Lindhardsen

  • Increased mortality and cardiovascular morbidity associated with use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in chronic heart failure.

    Gunnar H. Gislason;Jeppe N. Rasmussen;Steen Z. Abildstrom;Tina K. Schramm

  • Bystander Efforts and 1-Year Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

    Kristian Kragholm;Kristian Kragholm;Mads Wissenberg;Rikke N. Mortensen;Steen M. Hansen

  • Proton-pump inhibitors are associated with increased cardiovascular risk independent of clopidogrel use: a nationwide cohort study.

    Mette Charlot;Ole Ahlehoff;Mette Lykke Norgaard;Casper H. Jørgensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Torp-Pedersen
Christian Torp-Pedersen Aalborg University
Lars Køber
Lars Køber Copenhagen University Hospital
Peter Riis Hansen
Peter Riis Hansen University of Copenhagen
Lone Skov
Lone Skov University of Copenhagen
Jacob P. Thyssen
Jacob P. Thyssen University of Copenhagen
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Gregory Y.H. Lip University of Liverpool
Mark A. Hlatky
Mark A. Hlatky Stanford University
Henrik E. Poulsen
Henrik E. Poulsen University of Copenhagen
Allan Vaag
Allan Vaag Steno Diabetes Center
Jonathan M. Hodgson
Jonathan M. Hodgson Edith Cowan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in Medicine but prefer more flexible study options, numerous online degrees can help you enter or advance in healthcare. One popular path is pursuing nurse practitioner programs, which allow registered nurses to gain advanced clinical skills while working.

For those starting with an RN license, the cheapest rn to bsn online programs offer cost-effective ways to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN). This degree can broaden job opportunities and is a common requirement for leadership positions in nursing.

Nurses seeking to reach the highest academic level can explore the cheapest phd nursing programs online. These rigorous degrees focus on research and leadership, opening doors to careers in academia, advanced practice, or administration.

If affordability is a priority, there are many affordable rn to bsn programs designed to provide quality education without high tuition costs. Choosing a pathway that matches your career goals and budget can set you on the right trajectory in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Gunnar H. Gislason

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles