World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5399 5174 1975 1827 109 17005

Joshua Elliott publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joshua Elliott between 2005 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joshua Elliott published across 20 years, from 2005 to 2024, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2014. 9 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2014. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 1 publication
2005 2024

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joshua Elliott: publications per year, 2005 to 2024
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 0
2007 2
2008 1
2009 0
2010 2
2011 2
2012 5
2013 9
2014 15
2015 9
2016 11
2017 14
2018 11
2019 8
2020 14
2021 8
2022 2
2023 8
2024 1
Total 124
Download as CSV

Joshua Elliott publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua Elliott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 109 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 109
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Joshua Elliott D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua Elliott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Joshua Elliott is a researcher affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on infectious diseases, neurology, modeling and simulation, epidemiology, and clinical psychology as subfields of study.

The main topics featured in their research include:

  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Elliott's publication record contains a mixture of highly cited papers and collaborative work within prominent publication venues. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Science
  • The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
  • EClinicalMedicine

Among recent papers authored by Elliott are:

  • Predictive Accuracy of a Polygenic Risk Score-Enhanced Prediction Model vs a Clinical Risk Score for Coronary Artery Disease (2020) published in JAMA
  • Persistent COVID-19 symptoms in a community study of 606,434 people in England (2022) published in Nature Communications
  • SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence in England following the first peak of the pandemic (2021) published in Nature Communications
  • Antibody prevalence for SARS-CoV-2 following the peak of the pandemic in England: REACT2 study in 100,000 adults (2020) published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Antibody prevalence for SARS-CoV-2 in England following first peak of the pandemic: REACT2 study in 100,000 adults (2020) published in medRxiv

Their research collaborations include frequent co-authorship with several researchers:

  • Paul Elliott
  • Matthew Whitaker
  • Marc Chadeau-Hyam
  • Barbara Bodinier
  • Graham Cooke

Joshua Elliott's body of work is concentrated on the COVID-19 pandemic's clinical, epidemiological, and long-term consequences, as well as the development and evaluation of predictive tools within medical contexts. The research outputs have contributed data on SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence and long-term symptoms, alongside genetic risk prediction models for coronary artery disease.

Best Publications

  • Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates

    Chuang Zhao;Bing Liu;Shilong Piao;Xuhui Wang

  • Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison

    Cynthia Rosenzweig;Joshua Elliott;Joshua Elliott;Delphine Deryng;Alex C. Ruane;Alex C. Ruane

  • Constraints and potentials of future irrigation water availability on agricultural production under climate change

    Joshua Elliott;Delphine Deryng;Christoph Müller;Katja Frieler

  • Climate change effects on agriculture: Economic responses to biophysical shocks

    Gerald C. Nelson;Hugo Valin;Ronald D. Sands;Petr Havlík

  • Climate impacts on global agriculture emerge earlier in new generation of climate and crop models

    Jonas Jägermeyr;Jonas Jägermeyr;Jonas Jägermeyr;Christoph Müller;Alex C. Ruane;Joshua Elliott

  • Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming - simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b)

    Katja Frieler;Stefan Lange;Franziska Piontek;Christopher P. O. Reyer

  • Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods

    Bing Liu;Bing Liu;Senthold Asseng;Christoph Müller;Frank Ewert

  • Consistent negative response of US crops to high temperatures in observations and crop models

    Bernhard Schauberger;Sotirios Archontoulis;Almut Arneth;Juraj Balkovic

  • Machine learning algorithms for modeling groundwater level changes in agricultural regions of the U.S.

    S. Sahoo;T. A. Russo;J. Elliott;I. Foster

  • Global Gridded Crop Model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications

    Christoph Müller;Joshua Elliott;Joshua Elliott;James Chryssanthacopoulos;James Chryssanthacopoulos;Almut Arneth

  • State-of-the-art global models underestimate impacts from climate extremes

    Jacob Schewe;Simon N. Gosling;Christopher Reyer;Fang Zhao

  • Trade and Carbon Taxes

    Joshua Elliott;Ian Foster;Samuel Kortum;Todd Munson

  • Linked sustainability challenges and trade-offs among fisheries, aquaculture and agriculture.

    Julia L. Blanchard;Reg A. Watson;Elizabeth A. Fulton;Elizabeth A. Fulton;Richard S. Cottrell

  • Regional disparities in the beneficial effects of rising CO2 concentrations on crop water productivity

    Delphine Deryng;Delphine Deryng;Delphine Deryng;Joshua Elliott;Joshua Elliott;Christian Folberth;Christian Folberth;Christoph Müller

  • The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0)

    J. Elliott;C. Müller;D. Deryng;J. Chryssanthacopoulos

  • Constraining the New Aether: gravitational Cherenkov radiation

    Joshua W. Elliott;Guy D. Moore;Horace Stoica

  • Multisectoral climate impact hotspots in a warming world

    Franziska Piontek;Christoph Müller;Thomas A.M. Pugh;Douglas B. Clark

  • Emergent constraint on crop yield response to warmer temperature from field experiments

    Xuhui Wang;Chuang Zhao;Christoph Müller;Chenzhi Wang

  • Plausible rice yield losses under future climate warming.

    Chuang Zhao;Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Xuhui Wang;Yao Huang

  • The parallel system for integrating impact models and sectors (pSIMS)

    Joshua Elliott;David Kelly;James Chryssanthacopoulos;Michael Glotter

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex C. Ruane
Alex C. Ruane Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Delphine Deryng
Delphine Deryng Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Thomas A. M. Pugh
Thomas A. M. Pugh University of Birmingham
Christian Folberth
Christian Folberth International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Christoph Müller
Christoph Müller Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Xuhui Wang
Xuhui Wang Peking University
Erwin Schmid
Erwin Schmid BOKU University
Ian Foster
Ian Foster University of Chicago
Nikolay Khabarov
Nikolay Khabarov International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Cynthia Rosenzweig
Cynthia Rosenzweig Goddard Institute for Space Studies

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many learners opt for an online general studies degree affordable programs to build a broad knowledge base while keeping costs manageable.

If you are considering a degree with a more focused scientific approach but want a program that aligns with your personal pace, checking out the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get resources can provide insights into programs with flexible learning paths and supportive curricula.

Specialized degrees in environmental geosciences are gaining popularity. Programs featuring an geology online degree offer practical skills in earth science and environmental conservation, preparing students for roles in research and resource management.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a critical role in environmental analysis. Pursuing one of the best gis programs online can equip students with mapping and spatial data expertise valued in environmental planning, urban development, and disaster management careers.

Best Scientists Citing Joshua Elliott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles