World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Reimund P. Rötter

Reimund P. Rötter

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
63
Citations
18838
World Ranking
1017
National Ranking
78

Reimund P. Rötter publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reimund P. Rötter sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 223 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Reimund P. Rötter D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reimund P. Rötter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Statistics

His primary scientific interests are in Climate change, Crop, Crop yield, Agronomy and Yield. His research integrates issues of Agriculture and Agricultural soil science in his study of Climate change. Reimund P. Rötter has included themes like Global warming and Sowing in his Agriculture study.

His Crop yield research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Soil science, Sampling, Range, Effects of global warming and Agricultural engineering. His work on Phenology, Growing season and Plant breeding as part of general Agronomy study is frequently linked to Simulation modeling, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. The various areas that Reimund P. Rötter examines in his Yield study include Agroforestry and Global temperature.

His most cited work include:

  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production (801 citations)
  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change (749 citations)
  • Simulation of winter wheat yield and its variability in different climates of Europe: A comparison of eight crop growth models (325 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Climate change, Agronomy, Crop, Agriculture and Crop yield. Reimund P. Rötter integrates several fields in his works, including Climate change and Simulation modeling. His biological study deals with issues like Soil water, which deal with fields such as Evapotranspiration.

His work carried out in the field of Crop brings together such families of science as Cultivar, Yield, Irrigation and Sowing. His Agriculture research includes themes of Sustainability, Adaptive capacity and Environmental planning. His studies link Agricultural engineering with Crop yield.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Climate change (41.79%)
  • Agronomy (33.33%)
  • Crop (26.87%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Agronomy (33.33%)
  • Climate change (41.79%)
  • Crop (26.87%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Reimund P. Rötter mainly investigates Agronomy, Climate change, Crop, Cropping and Agriculture. The Agronomy study combines topics in areas such as Soil water and Soil fertility. Reimund P. Rötter specializes in Climate change, namely Crop simulation model.

His Crop research includes elements of Cultivar, Yield, Productivity, Leaf area index and Frost. His studies in Cropping integrate themes in fields like Intercropping, Cropping system, Phenology and Adaptation. His Agriculture research integrates issues from Global warming, Agroforestry, Sustainability and Scholarship.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein (97 citations)
  • Contribution of crop model structure, parameters and climate projections to uncertainty in climate change impact assessments. (63 citations)
  • Multimodel ensembles improve predictions of crop-environment-management interactions. (44 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Statistics

His main research concerns Climate change, Food security, Crop, Agriculture and Agronomy. Reimund P. Rötter applies his multidisciplinary studies on Climate change and Simulation modeling in his research. Reimund P. Rötter has included themes like Baseline, Water scarcity, Scholarship and Library science in his Food security study.

His Crop study incorporates themes from Fertilizer and Yield. His Agriculture research includes themes of Throughfall, Evapotranspiration and Shade tree. His study in the fields of Wheat grain and Grain yield under the domain of Agronomy overlaps with other disciplines such as Co2 concentration and Protein concentration.

Best Publications

  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;P. Martre;P. Martre;R. P. Rötter

  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;C. Rosenzweig;J. W. Jones

  • Adverse weather conditions for European wheat production will become more frequent with climate change

    Miroslav Trnka;Miroslav Trnka;Reimund P. Rötter;Margarita Ruiz-Ramos;Kurt Christian Kersebaum

  • Simulation of winter wheat yield and its variability in different climates of Europe: A comparison of eight crop growth models

    Taru Palosuo;Kurt Christian Kersebaum;Carlos Angulo;Petr Hlavinka

  • Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods

    Bing Liu;Bing Liu;Senthold Asseng;Christoph Müller;Frank Ewert

  • Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one

    Pierre Martre;Pierre Martre;Daniel Wallach;Senthold Asseng;Frank Ewert

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein

    Senthold Asseng;Pierre Martre;Andrea Maiorano;Reimund P Rötter

  • Agroclimatic conditions in Europe under climate change

    M. Trnka;Jørgen Eivind Olesen;K. C. Kersebaum;A. O. Skjelvåg

  • Crop-climate models need an overhaul

    Reimund P. Rötter;Timothy R. Carter;Jørgen E. Olesen;John R. Porter

  • Simulation of spring barley yield in different climatic zones of Northern and Central Europe: A comparison of nine crop models

    Reimund P. Rötter;Taru Palosuo;Kurt Christian Kersebaum;Carlos Angulo

  • Agriculture in a changing climate: impacts and adaptation

    J. Reilly;W. Baethgen;F.E. Chege;S.C. van de Geijn

  • Climate change effects on plant growth, crop yield and livestock

    R.P. Rötter;S.C. van de Geijn

  • Crop modelling for integrated assessment of risk to food production from climate change

    F. Ewert;R.P. Rötter;M. Bindi;H. Webber

  • The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions.

    Enli Wang;Pierre Martre;Zhigan Zhao;Zhigan Zhao;Frank Ewert

  • WOFOST 7.1; user's guide for the WOFOST 7.1 crop growth simulation model and WOFOST Control Center 1.5

    H.L. Boogaard;C.A. van Diepen;R.P. Rotter;J.M.C.A. Cabrera

  • Silver lining to a climate crisis in multiple prospects for alleviating crop waterlogging under future climates

    Unknown

  • Responses of wheat growth and yield to climate change in different climate zones of China, 1981–2009

    Fulu Tao;Zhao Zhang;Dengpan Xiao;Shuai Zhang

  • Implication of crop model calibration strategies for assessing regional impacts of climate change in Europe

    Carlos Angulo;Reimund Rötter;Reiner Lock;Andreas Enders

  • Contribution of crop model structure, parameters and climate projections to uncertainty in climate change impact assessments.

    Fulu Tao;Reimund P. Rötter;Taru Palosuo;Carlos Gregorio Hernández Díaz‐Ambrona

  • Climate variability and change in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia: challenges for rainfed crop production

    B.T. Kassie;R.P. Roetter;H. Hengsdijk;S. Asseng

  • Use of crop simulation modelling to aid ideotype design of future cereal cultivars

    R. P. Rötter;F. Tao;J. G. Höhn;T. Palosuo

  • Changes in time of sowing, flowering and maturity of cereals in Europe under climate change

    J.E. Olesen;C.D. Børgesen;L. Elsgaard;Taru Palosuo

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Ewert
Frank Ewert University of Bonn
Taru Palosuo
Taru Palosuo Natural Resources Institute Finland
Kurt Christian Kersebaum
Kurt Christian Kersebaum Czech Academy of Sciences
Fulu Tao
Fulu Tao Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jørgen E. Olesen
Jørgen E. Olesen Aarhus University
Claas Nendel
Claas Nendel University of Potsdam
Senthold Asseng
Senthold Asseng Technical University of Munich
Davide Cammarano
Davide Cammarano Aarhus University
Marco Bindi
Marco Bindi University of Florence
Thomas Gaiser
Thomas Gaiser University of Bonn

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Reimund P. Rötter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles