World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joost H.M. van Delft

Joost H.M. van Delft

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
7225
World Ranking
18469
National Ranking
441

Joost H.M. van Delft publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joost H.M. van Delft sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 128 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Joost H.M. van Delft D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joost H.M. van Delft sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joost H.M. van Delft is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their academic profile centers around scientific research at this institution, contributing to its scholarly community through various projects and collaborations.

While specific details on publications, topics of research, co-authors, and awards are not provided, the affiliation with a prominent European university situates van Delft within a network of higher education and research activities.

As no recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues are listed, there is no available information on specific works or collaborations. Similarly, no data on book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of research has been supplied to further delineate their expertise.

The absence of recorded awards suggests that no formal recognitions have been documented in the source data, but this does not preclude contributions made within their institution or field.

Van Delft is currently active, as the data confirms they are not deceased.

Best Publications

  • A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium

    Zhenqiang Su;Paweł P. Łabaj;Sheng Li;Jean Thierry-Mieg

  • Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects—2010

    Sarah Adler;David Basketter;Stuart Creton;Olavi Pelkonen

  • The concordance between RNA-seq and microarray data depends on chemical treatment and transcript abundance

    Charles Wang;Binsheng Gong;Pierre R. Bushel;Jean Thierry-Mieg

  • Comparison of HepG2 and HepaRG by whole-genome gene expression analysis for the purpose of chemical hazard identification.

    Danyel G. J. Jennen;Christina Magkoufopoulou;Hans B. Ketelslegers;Hans B. Ketelslegers;Marcel H. M. van Herwijnen

  • Biological monitoring the exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of coke oven workers in relation to smoking and genetic polymorphisms for GSTM1 and GSTT1.

    Joost H. M. van Delft;Marie-José S. T. Steenwinkel;Jeff G. van Asten;Nico de Vogel

  • Prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins is associated with increased risk of wheeze and infections in infants.

    Solvor Berntsen Stølevik;Unni Cecilie Nygaard;Ellen Namork;Margaretha Haugen

  • Binary PAH mixtures cause additive or antagonistic effects on gene expression but synergistic effects on DNA adduct formation

    Yvonne C.M. Staal;Dennie G.A.J. Hebels;Marcel H.M. van Herwijnen;Ralph W.H. Gottschalk

  • An untargeted multi-technique metabolomics approach to studying intracellular metabolites of HepG2 cells exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

    Ainhoa Ruiz-Aracama;Ad A. C. M. Peijnenburg;Jos Kleinjans;Danyel Jennen

  • Differential gene expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells induced by cigarette smoke and its constituents

    Danitsja M. van Leeuwen;Ralph W. H. Gottschalk;Marcel H. van Herwijnen;Edwin J. Moonen

  • SFTG international collaborative study on in vitro micronucleus test: II. Using human lymphocytes

    M. Gillian Clare;Giocondo Lorenzon;Leslie C. Akhurst;Daniel Marzin

  • Proteomics Investigations of Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity in HepG2 Cells.

    Anke Van Summeren;Johan Renes;Freek G. Bouwman;Jean-Paul Noben

  • Meeting report: Validation of toxicogenomics-based test systems: ECVAM-ICCVAM/NICEATM considerations for regulatory use

    Raffaella Corvi;Hans Jürgen Ahr;Sylvio Albertini;David H. Blakey

  • Assessing the metabolic competence of sandwich-cultured mouse primary hepatocytes.

    Karen Mathijs;Anne S. Kienhuis;Karen J. J. Brauers;Danyel G. J. Jennen

  • Cigarette smoke-induced differential gene expression in blood cells from monozygotic twin pairs

    Danitsja M.van Leeuwen;Ebienus van Agen;Ralph W.H. Gottschalk;Robert Vlietinck

  • Discrimination for genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens by gene expression profiling in primary mouse hepatocytes improves with exposure time.

    Karen Mathijs;Karen J. J. Brauers;Danyel G. J. Jennen;Andre Boorsma

  • In vitro gene expression data supporting a DNA non-reactive genotoxic mechanism for ochratoxin A.

    Leire Arbillaga;Amaia Azqueta;Joost H.M. van Delft;Adela López de Cerain

  • Modulation of gene expression and DNA adduct formation in HepG2 cells by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with different carcinogenic potencies.

    Yvonne C.M. Staal;Marcel H.M. van Herwijnen;Frederik J. van Schooten;Joost H.M. van Delft

  • Monitoring developmental toxicity in the embryonic stem cell test using differential gene expression of differentiation-related genes.

    Dorien A. M. van Dartel;Dorien A. M. van Dartel;Jeroen L. A. Pennings;Liset J. J. de la Fonteyne;Marcel H. van Herwijnen

  • Classification of hepatotoxicants using HepG2 cells: A proof of principle study.

    Wim F P M Van den Hof;Maarten L J Coonen;Marcel van Herwijnen;Karen Brauers

  • RNA-Seq Provides New Insights in the Transcriptome Responses Induced by the Carcinogen Benzo[a]pyrene

    Joost van Delft;Stan Gaj;Matthias Lienhard;Marcus W. Albrecht

Frequent Co-Authors

Jos C. S. Kleinjans
Jos C. S. Kleinjans Maastricht University
Frederik J. van Schooten
Frederik J. van Schooten Maastricht University
Henk van Loveren
Henk van Loveren Maastricht University
Mathieu Vinken
Mathieu Vinken Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Aldert H. Piersma
Aldert H. Piersma Centre for Health Protection
Roger W. L. Godschalk
Roger W. L. Godschalk Maastricht University
Vera Rogiers
Vera Rogiers Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Greet Schoeters
Greet Schoeters University of Antwerp
Edwin C. M. Mariman
Edwin C. M. Mariman Maastricht University
Ralf Herwig
Ralf Herwig Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Joost H.M. van Delft

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles