World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Greet Schoeters

Greet Schoeters

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 71 1624 1545 25 25 332 15607

Greet Schoeters publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Greet Schoeters between 1979 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Greet Schoeters published across 48 years, from 1979 to 2026, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2022. 11 of the 461 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2022. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
1979 2026

461 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Greet Schoeters: publications per year, 1979 to 2026
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 0
1987 2
1988 3
1989 1
1990 2
1991 5
1992 4
1993 2
1994 4
1995 3
1996 3
1997 1
1998 3
1999 2
2000 2
2001 7
2002 11
2003 6
2004 9
2005 9
2006 21
2007 11
2008 22
2009 23
2010 12
2011 20
2012 22
2013 18
2014 28
2015 30
2016 18
2017 16
2018 15
2019 11
2020 8
2021 17
2022 36
2023 22
2024 11
2025 10
2026 1
Total 461
Download as CSV

Greet Schoeters publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greet Schoeters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 332 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80 332
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Greet Schoeters D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greet Schoeters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105 71
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Greet Schoeters is affiliated with the University of Antwerp in Belgium and primarily works in the field of Environmental Science. The research focus includes subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, Plant Science, Cancer Research, and Pollution.

The scientist's research topics cover various areas including:

  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Greet Schoeters include:

  • Eva Govarts
  • Marike Kolossa-Gehring
  • Elly Den Hond
  • Adrian Covaci
  • Laura Rodríguez Martín

Greet Schoeters has published extensively in several scientific journals. The prominent publication venues are:

  • International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
  • Toxics
  • Environmental Research
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Environment International

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Greet Schoeters include:

  • HBM4EU combines and harmonises human biomonitoring data across the EU, building on existing capacity - The HBM4EU survey (2021), International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
  • PFAS levels and determinants of variability in exposure in European teenagers - Results from the HBM4EU aligned studies (2014-2021) (2022), International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
  • Chemical prioritisation strategy in the European Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU) - Development and results (2021), International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
  • Harmonization of Human Biomonitoring Studies in Europe: Characteristics of the HBM4EU-Aligned Studies Participants (2022), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • PFAS levels and exposure determinants in sensitive population groups (2022), Chemosphere

Best Publications

  • Comparison of Five In Vitro Digestion Models To Study the Bioaccessibility of Soil Contaminants

    Agnes G. Oomen;Alfons Hack;Mans Minekus;Evelijn Zeijdner

  • Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects—2010

    Sarah Adler;David Basketter;Stuart Creton;Olavi Pelkonen

  • Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food chain on perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and their salts

    D. Benford;J. de Boer;A. Carere;A. di Domenico

  • Birth weight and prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE): a meta-analysis within 12 European Birth Cohorts

    Eva Govarts;Mark Nieuwenhuijsen;Greet Schoeters;Greet Schoeters;Ferran Ballester

  • Renal function, cytogenetic measurements, and sexual development in adolescents in relation to environmental pollutants: a feasibility study of biomarkers

    Jan A. Staessen;Tim Nawrot;Elly Den Hond;Lutgarde Thijs

  • Cadmium and children: exposure and health effects.

    Greet Schoeters;Elly Den Hond;Moniek Zuurbier;Rima Naginiene

  • Genotoxic effects of carbon black particles, diesel exhaust particles, and urban air particulates and their extracts on a human alveolar epithelial cell line (A549) and a human monocytic cell line (THP-1).

    A. Don Porto Carero;P.H.M. Hoet;L. Verschaeve;G. Schoeters

  • Intrauterine Exposure to Environmental Pollutants and Body Mass Index during the First 3 Years of Life

    Stijn L. Verhulst;Vera Nelen;Elly Den Hond;Gudrun Koppen

  • The faroes statement: human health effects of developmental exposure to chemicals in our environment.

    Philippe Grandjean;Philippe Grandjean;David Bellinger;Åke Bergman;Sylvaine Cordier

  • First steps toward harmonized human biomonitoring in Europe: Demonstration project to perform human biomonitoring on a European scale

    Elly Den Hond;Eva Govarts;Hanny Willems;Roel Smolders

  • Endocrine disruptors and abnormalities of pubertal development.

    Greet Schoeters;Greet Schoeters;Elly Den Hond;Willem Dhooge;Nicolas Van Larebeke

  • Human biomonitoring as a tool to support chemicals regulation in the European Union.

    Catherine Ganzleben;Jean-Philippe Antignac;Robert Barouki;Argelia Castaño

  • Urinary BPA measurements in children and mothers from six European member states: Overall results and determinants of exposure

    Adrian Covaci;Elly Den Hond;Tinne Geens;Eva Govarts

  • Fourth WHO-coordinated survey of human milk for persistent organic pollutants (POPs): Belgian results.

    Ann Colles;Gudrun Koppen;Vincent Hanot;Vera Nelen

  • Health risk assessment of dioxin emissions from municipal waste incinerators: the Neerlandquarter (Wilrijk, Belgium).

    J Nouwen;C Cornelis;R De Fré;M Wevers

  • Endocrine disrupters and human puberty.

    E. Den Hond;G. Schoeters

  • Applicability of non-invasively collected matrices for human biomonitoring

    Roel Smolders;Karl-Werner Schramm;Marc Nickmilder;Greet Schoeters

  • Cohort Profile: Pregnancy And Childhood Epigenetics (PACE) Consortium

    Janine F Felix;Bonnie R Joubert;Andrea A Baccarelli;Gemma C Sharp;Gemma C Sharp

  • Prenatal exposure to environmental contaminants and behavioural problems at age 7–8 years

    Isabelle Sioen;Isabelle Sioen;Elly Den Hond;Vera Nelen;Els Van de Mieroop

  • Human biomonitoring in health risk assessment in Europe: Current practices and recommendations for the future.

    Henriqueta Louro;Milla Heinälä;Jos Bessems;Jurgen Buekers

  • Fish consumption patterns and hair mercury levels in children and their mothers in 17 EU countries

    Argelia Castaño;Francisco Cutanda;Marta Esteban;Peter Pärt

  • Protective effect of the bile salt hydrolase-active Lactobacillus reuteri against bile salt cytotoxicity.

    P. De Boever;R. Wouters;L. Verschaeve;P. Berckmans

  • Association of Thyroid Hormone Concentrations with Levels of Organochlorine Compounds in Cord Blood of Neonates

    Johan Maervoet;Griet Vermeir;Adrian Covaci;Nicolas Van Larebeke

  • Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in human milk: a biomonitoring study in rural areas of Flanders (Belgium).

    K. Croes;K. Croes;A. Colles;G. Koppen;E. Govarts

Frequent Co-Authors

Gudrun Koppen
Gudrun Koppen University of Antwerp
Tim S. Nawrot
Tim S. Nawrot Hasselt University
Willy Baeyens
Willy Baeyens Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Marike Kolossa-Gehring
Marike Kolossa-Gehring German Environment Agency
Adrian Covaci
Adrian Covaci University of Antwerp
Holger M. Koch
Holger M. Koch Ruhr University Bochum
Milena Horvat
Milena Horvat Jožef Stefan Institute
Jos C. S. Kleinjans
Jos C. S. Kleinjans Maastricht University
Arno C. Gutleb
Arno C. Gutleb Wageningen University & Research
Peter Rudnai
Peter Rudnai National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities. Many programs offer flexible options, including some of the most affordable online general studies degree programs, allowing learners to balance education with other commitments without compromising quality.

If you're looking for a straightforward path to enter the field, studying what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get may be appealing. Degrees focused on environmental or general studies often provide foundational knowledge and transferable skills suited for various roles in sustainability, conservation, or public policy.

Specialized areas like geology are essential within environmental sciences. Pursuing geology degrees online can equip students with the expertise to analyze earth systems, critical for addressing issues such as resource management and natural hazard assessment.

Another high-demand field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which uses spatial data to solve environmental challenges. The best GIS undergraduate programs often offer online formats, preparing graduates for careers in mapping, environmental consulting, and urban planning.

Best Scientists Citing Greet Schoeters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles