World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tim S. Nawrot

Tim S. Nawrot

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 99 8681 8151 98 94 562 31443

Tim S. Nawrot publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tim S. Nawrot between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tim S. Nawrot published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 33.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 75 publications in 2022. 127 of the 829 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 75. Peak 75 publications in 2022. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 33 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 35 publications 2015: 52 publications 2016: 49 publications 2017: 47 publications 2018: 44 publications 2019: 58 publications 2020: 52 publications 2021: 52 publications 2022: 75 publications 2023: 55 publications 2024: 54 publications 2025: 73 publications
2001 2025

829 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tim S. Nawrot: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 12
2003 8
2004 8
2005 6
2006 14
2007 13
2008 11
2009 14
2010 13
2011 33
2012 24
2013 25
2014 35
2015 52
2016 49
2017 47
2018 44
2019 58
2020 52
2021 52
2022 75
2023 55
2024 54
2025 73
Total 829
Download as CSV

Tim S. Nawrot publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim S. Nawrot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 562 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 562
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Tim S. Nawrot D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim S. Nawrot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 99
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tim S. Nawrot is affiliated with Hasselt University in Belgium and has a substantial body of research in environmental science and medicine. Their work encompasses multiple subfields including health, toxicology and mutagenesis, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, physiology, molecular biology, and pollution.

The scientist's research primarily focuses on topics such as air quality and health impacts, birth, development and health, climate change and health impacts, health, environment, cognitive aging, urban green space and health, telomeres, telomerase and senescence, and noise effects and management.

Tim S. Nawrot has published numerous papers in prominent venues. Frequent publication channels include:

  • Environmental Research
  • ISEE Conference Abstracts
  • Environment International
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Environmental Health

Selected recent papers feature topics related to environmental insults, maternal and fetal exposure to black carbon particles, epigenome-wide analyses related to gestational age, and nanoparticle translocation across the placenta. Notable recent publications include:

  • Hallmarks of environmental insults, 2021, Cell
  • Maternal exposure to ambient black carbon particles and their presence in maternal and fetal circulation and organs: an analysis of two independent population-based observational studies, 2022, The Lancet Planetary Health
  • Epigenome-wide meta-analysis of blood DNA methylation in newborns and children identifies numerous loci related to gestational age, 2020, Genome Medicine
  • Translocation of (ultra)fine particles and nanoparticles across the placenta; a systematic review on the evidence of in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo studies, 2020, Particle and Fibre Toxicology
  • Residing in urban areas with higher green space is associated with lower mortality risk: A census-based cohort study with ten years of follow-up, 2021, Environment International

Tim S. Nawrot collaborates regularly with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Michelle Plusquin
  • Dries S. Martens
  • Esmée M. Bijnens
  • Jan A. Staessen
  • Yu-Ling Yu

The scientist's research contributes to understanding how environmental factors and exposures influence human health, particularly focusing on early life stages, urban environments, and molecular mechanisms underlying health outcomes. Their work integrates epidemiological methods with molecular and physiological insights across multiple disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Cadmium stress: an oxidative challenge

    Ann Cuypers;Michelle Plusquin;Tony Remans;Marijke Jozefczak

  • Environmental exposure to cadmium and risk of cancer: a prospective population-based study

    Tim Nawrot;Michelle Plusquin;Janneke Hogervorst;Harry A Roels

  • Ambient black carbon particles reach the fetal side of human placenta

    Hannelore Bové;Hannelore Bové;Eva Bongaerts;Eli Slenders;Esmée M. Bijnens

  • Public health importance of triggers of myocardial infarction: a comparative risk assessment

    Tim S Nawrot;Laura Perez;Nino Künzli;Elke Munters

  • Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Derived From 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

    Yan Li;Ji-Guang Wang;Eamon Dolan;Ping-Jin Gao

  • Gender and telomere length : systematic review and meta-analysis

    Michael Gardner;David Bann;Laura Wiley;Rachel Cooper

  • How much do resin-based dental materials release? A meta-analytical approach

    K.L. Van Landuyt;Tim Nawrot;Tim Nawrot;B. Geebelen;J. De Munck

  • Cadmium exposure in the population: from health risks to strategies of prevention

    Tim S. Nawrot;Jan A. Staessen;Jan A. Staessen;Harry A. Roels;Elke Munters

  • Prevalence, Persistence, and Clinical Significance of Masked Hypertension in Youth

    Empar Lurbe;Isabel Torro;Vicente Alvarez;Tim Nawrot

  • Sustainability of artisanal mining of cobalt in DR Congo.

    Célestin Banza Lubaba Nkulu;Lidia Casas;Vincent Haufroid;Thierry De Putter

  • Telomere length and possible link to X chromosome.

    Tim S Nawrot;Jan A Staessen;Jeffrey P Gardner;Abraham Aviv

  • Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Antihypertensive Treatment A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Ji Guang Wang;Jan A. Staessen;Yan Li;Luc M. Van Bortel

  • Effect of Smoke-Free Legislation on Perinatal and Child Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Jasper V. Been;Ulugbek B. Nurmatov;Bianca Cox;Tim S. Nawrot

  • Obesity is associated with increased arterial stiffness from adolescence until old age.

    Pantelis E Zebekakis;Tim Nawrot;Lutgarde Thijs;Elisabeth J Balkestein

  • High human exposure to cobalt and other metals in Katanga, a mining area of the Democratic Republic of Congo

    Célestin Lubaba Nkulu Banza;Tim S. Nawrot;Vincent Haufroid;Sophie Decrée;Sophie Decrée

  • C-reactive protein: a new predictor of adverse outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

    Rozenn Quarck;Tim Nawrot;Tim Nawrot;Bart Meyns;Marion Delcroix

  • An epidemiological re-appraisal of the association between blood pressure and blood lead: a meta-analysis.

    T S Nawrot;Lutgarde Thijs;E M Den Hond;H A Roels

  • MicroRNAs as potential signatures of environmental exposure or effect: a systematic review.

    Karen Vrijens;Valentina Bollati;Tim S. Nawrot

  • Ambient Black Carbon Particles Reach the Fetal Side of Human Placenta

    Bongaerts E;Bové H;Ameloot M;Nawrot T

  • Ambulatory arterial stiffness index derived from 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Commentary

    Stéphane Laurent;Athanase Benetos;Patrick Lacolley;Yan Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Greet Schoeters
Greet Schoeters University of Antwerp
Benoit Nemery
Benoit Nemery KU Leuven
Luc Int Panis
Luc Int Panis Hasselt University
Jaco Vangronsveld
Jaco Vangronsveld Hasselt University
Willy Baeyens
Willy Baeyens Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Martine Vrijheid
Martine Vrijheid Pompeu Fabra University
Jordi Sunyer
Jordi Sunyer Pompeu Fabra University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in the medical field but want alternative routes, there are several rewarding online degrees and career pathways to consider, each with its own set of advantages and challenges.

For those seeking a clinical role, becoming a nurse practitioner is both respected and in high demand. Flexible online nurse practitioner programs make it easier to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Another in-demand profession is pharmacy. Choosing the cheapest online pharmacy school can help lower student debt and still prepare you for careers in clinical or retail pharmacy.

If you prefer the administrative side of healthcare, consider an online rhit degree program in Health Information Management. This pathway offers roles focused on data, compliance, and record-keeping.

Entry-level options like affordable medical billing and coding programs allow you to quickly enter the workforce and play a vital part in the healthcare system.

These online programs provide valuable opportunities outside the traditional medical school path, often with greater affordability and flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Tim S. Nawrot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles