World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
T. Michael Underhill

T. Michael Underhill

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
50
Citations
6659
World Ranking
2584
National Ranking
81

T. Michael Underhill publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Michael Underhill sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 75 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

T. Michael Underhill D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Michael Underhill sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

T. Michael Underhill is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields including Molecular Biology, Surgery, Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Oncology.

The main research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
  • Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Congenital heart defects research

Frequent co-authors of T. Michael Underhill comprise:

  • R. Wilder Scott
  • Lesley A. Hill
  • Martin Arostegui
  • Fábio Rossi
  • Roman Krawetz

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • Distinct Regulatory Programs Control the Latent Regenerative Potential of Dermal Fibroblasts during Wound Healing, 2020, Cell stem cell
  • Multipotent stromal cells: One name, multiple identities, 2021, Cell stem cell
  • Pathogenic Potential of Hic1-Expressing Cardiac Stromal Progenitors, 2020, Cell stem cell
  • Distinct Regulatory Programs Control the Latent Regenerative Potential of Dermal Fibroblasts during Wound Healing, 2021, Cell stem cell
  • Abortive γδTCR rearrangements suggest ILC2s are derived from T-cell precursors, 2020, Blood Advances

The venues where they have published most frequently are:

  • Cell stem cell
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research
  • Nature Communications
  • Cell Reports

Best Publications

  • Bone sialoprotein expression enhances osteoblast differentiation and matrix mineralization in vitro.

    Jonathan A.R. Gordon;Coralee E. Tye;Arthur V. Sampaio;T. Michael Underhill

  • Pseudopodial Actin Dynamics Control Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Metastatic Cancer Cells

    Jay Shankar;Anat Messenberg;Jackie Chan;T. Michael Underhill

  • Clonal Decomposition and DNA Replication States Defined by Scaled Single-Cell Genome Sequencing

    Emma Laks;Emma Laks;Andrew McPherson;Andrew McPherson;Andrew McPherson;Hans Zahn;Hans Zahn;Daniel Lai;Daniel Lai

  • Roles of IP3R and RyR Ca2+ Channels in Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and β-Cell Death

    Dan S. Luciani;Kamila S. Gwiazda;Ting-Lin B. Yang;Tatyana B. Kalynyak

  • Hic1 Defines Quiescent Mesenchymal Progenitor Subpopulations with Distinct Functions and Fates in Skeletal Muscle Regeneration.

    R. Wilder Scott;Martin Arostegui;Ronen Schweitzer;Fabio M.V. Rossi

  • Regulation of skeletal progenitor differentiation by the BMP and retinoid signaling pathways.

    Andrea D. Weston;Vicki Rosen;Roshantha A.S. Chandraratna;T. Michael Underhill

  • MAP kinases in chondrocyte differentiation

    Lee-Anne Stanton;T.Michael Underhill;Frank Beier

  • Active repression by unliganded retinoid receptors in development less is sometimes more

    Andrea D. Weston;Bruce Blumberg;T. Michael Underhill

  • p38 MAP kinase signalling is required for hypertrophic chondrocyte differentiation.

    Lee-Anne Stanton;Shalev Sabari;Arthur V. Sampaio;T. Michael Underhill

  • Mutation of the bone morphogenetic protein GDF3 causes ocular and skeletal anomalies

    Ming Ye;Karyn M. Berry-Wynne;Mika Asai-Coakwell;Periasamy Sundaresan

  • Deconstruction of the SS18-SSX Fusion Oncoprotein Complex: Insights into Disease Etiology and Therapeutics

    Le Su;Arthur V. Sampaio;Kevin B. Jones;Kevin B. Jones;Marina Pacheco

  • Requirement for RAR-mediated gene repression in skeletal progenitor differentiation

    Andrea D. Weston;Roshantha A.S. Chandraratna;Joseph Torchia;T. Michael Underhill

  • The methyltransferase G9a regulates HoxA9-dependent transcription in AML

    Bernhard Lehnertz;Bernhard Lehnertz;Caroline Pabst;Le Su;Michelle Miller

  • Distinct Regulatory Programs Control the Latent Regenerative Potential of Dermal Fibroblasts during Wound Healing

    Sepideh Abbasi;Sarthak Sinha;Elodie Labit;Nicole L. Rosin

  • Microarray analyses of gene expression during chondrocyte differentiation identifies novel regulators of hypertrophy.

    Claudine G. James;C. Thomas G. Appleton;Veronica Ulici;T. Michael Underhill;T. Michael Underhill

  • BMP action in skeletogenesis involves attenuation of retinoid signaling

    Lisa M. Hoffman;Kamal Garcha;Konstantina Karamboulas;Matthew F. Cowan

  • Dynamics and interaction of caveolin-1 isoforms with BMP-receptors.

    Anja Nohe;Eleonora Keating;T. Michael Underhill;Petra Knaus

  • Mechanisms of action of the congenital diaphragmatic hernia-inducing teratogen nitrofen.

    B. Rhiannon Noble;Randal P. Babiuk;Robin D. Clugston;T. Michael Underhill

  • Retinoic Acid Receptor α Function in Vertebrate Limb Skeletogenesis: a Modulator of Chondrogenesis

    David E. Cash;Cheryl B. Bock;Klaus Schughart;Elwood Linney

  • Pannexin 3 is a novel target for Runx2, expressed by osteoblasts and mature growth plate chondrocytes.

    Stephen R Bond;Alice Lau;Silvia Penuela;Arthur V Sampaio

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Beier
Frank Beier University of Western Ontario
Fabio M.V. Rossi
Fabio M.V. Rossi University of British Columbia
Kelly M. McNagny
Kelly M. McNagny University of British Columbia
Torsten O. Nielsen
Torsten O. Nielsen University of British Columbia
Dennis E. Bulman
Dennis E. Bulman Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Martin Petkovich
Martin Petkovich Queen's University
Sohrab P. Shah
Sohrab P. Shah Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Marco A. Marra
Marco A. Marra University of British Columbia
Steven J.M. Jones
Steven J.M. Jones University of British Columbia
Mario R. Capecchi
Mario R. Capecchi University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open diverse opportunities for students interested in Molecular Biology. Many professionals pursue degrees through accredited programs, ensuring high standards and widely recognized qualifications. For example, programs with strong capella university nursing accreditation are often highly valued by employers and professional associations.

Students looking to advance their healthcare career may also consider online bsn to msn programs. These bridge programs offer a flexible pathway for registered nurses who want to build leadership and specialized research skills, which are highly relevant for molecular biology roles.

Choosing the right institution is also key. Many learners prefer not for profit online colleges for their reputation, commitment to student outcomes, and affordability. For active-duty military, veterans, or family members, best military friendly colleges offer tailored support and flexible learning options, making a science degree more accessible.

Overall, the expansion of accredited, flexible online programs has made it easier than ever to pursue molecular biology education and related career pathways, wherever you are in your academic journey.

Best Scientists Citing T. Michael Underhill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles