World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9619 8999 420 406 158 4387

Lara Tucha publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lara Tucha between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lara Tucha published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2014. 3 of the 170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2014. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
2007 2025

170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lara Tucha: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 2
2009 6
2010 4
2011 6
2012 12
2013 16
2014 24
2015 20
2016 16
2017 12
2018 8
2019 10
2020 9
2021 13
2022 4
2023 4
2024 2
2025 1
Total 170
Download as CSV

Lara Tucha publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lara Tucha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 158
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lara Tucha D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lara Tucha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lara Tucha is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine and Neuroscience, with significant contributions to the subfields of Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's main research topics cover Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Cognitive Functions and Memory, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Behavioral and Psychological Studies, and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Neural Transmission
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Applied Neuropsychology Adult

Lara Tucha has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, including:

  • Oliver Tucha (28 co-authored publications)
  • Anselm B. M. Fuermaier (25 co-authored publications)
  • Janneke Koerts (13 co-authored publications)
  • Steffen Aschenbrenner (12 co-authored publications)
  • Matthias Weisbrod (11 co-authored publications)

Regarding recent scholarly publications, some notable works include:

  • "ADHD at the workplace: ADHD symptoms, diagnostic status, and work-related functioning," 2021, Journal of Neural Transmission
  • "Basic and complex cognitive functions in Adult ADHD," 2021, PLoS ONE
  • "Metacognition in adult ADHD: subjective and objective perspectives on self-awareness of cognitive functioning," 2021, Journal of Neural Transmission
  • "Testing the relation between ADHD and hyperfocus experiences," 2020, Research in Developmental Disabilities
  • "Neuropsychological functioning of individuals at clinical evaluation of adult ADHD," 2020, Journal of Neural Transmission

Best Publications

  • The history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Klaus W. Lange;Susanne Reichl;Katharina M. Lange;Lara Tucha

  • Stigma in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Anna K. Mueller;Anselm B. M. Fuermaier;Janneke Koerts;Lara Tucha

  • Sweat it out? The effects of physical exercise on cognition and behavior in children and adults with ADHD: A systematic literature review

    Anne E. Den Heijer;Yvonne Groen;Lara Tucha;Anselm B. M. Fuermaier

  • Vigilance and sustained attention in children and adults with ADHD.

    Lara Tucha;Oliver Tucha;Susanne Walitza;Thomas A. Sontag

  • Cognitive Impairment in Adult ADHD-Perspective Matters!

    Anselm B. M. Fuermaier;Lara Tucha;Janneke Koerts;Steffen Aschenbrenner

  • Sustained attention in adult ADHD: time-on-task effects of various measures of attention.

    Lara Tucha;Anselm B. M. Fuermaier;Janneke Koerts;Rieka Buggenthin

  • Neuropsychological assessment of attention in adults with different subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    L. Tucha;O. Tucha;R. Laufkötter;S. Walitza

  • The Five-Point Test: Reliability, Validity and Normative Data for Children and Adults

    Lara Tucha;Steffen Aschenbrenner;Janneke Koerts;Klaus W. Lange

  • Good vibrations--effects of whole body vibration on attention in healthy individuals and individuals with ADHD.

    Anselm B. M. Fuermaier;Lara Tucha;Janneke Koerts;Marieke J. G. van Heuvelen

  • Driving and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

    Anselm B M Fuermaier;Lara Tucha;Ben Lewis Evans;Janneke Koerts

  • Training of attention functions in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Oliver Tucha;Lara Tucha;Gesa Kaumann;Sebastian König

  • Whole Body Vibration Improves Cognition in Healthy Young Adults

    G. Ruben H. Regterschot;Marieke J. G. Van Heuvelen;Edzard B. Zeinstra;Edzard B. Zeinstra;Anselm B. M. Fuermaier

  • Graphonomics, Automaticity and Handwriting Assessment.

    Oliver Tucha;Lara Tucha;Klaus W. Lange

  • ADHD at the workplace: ADHD symptoms, diagnostic status, and work-related functioning

    Anselm B. M. Fuermaier;Lara Tucha;Marah Butzbach;Matthias Weisbrod

  • Complaints about impairments in executive functions in Parkinson's disease: The association with neuropsychological assessment

    Janneke Koerts;Janneke Koerts;Marije van Beilen;Klaus L. Leenders;Wiebo Hendrik Brouwer;Wiebo Hendrik Brouwer

  • The Effects of Classroom Interventions on Off-Task and Disruptive Classroom Behavior in Children with Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Review.

    Geraldina F. Gaastra;Yvonne Groen;Lara Tucha;Oliver Tucha

  • Perception in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Anselm B. M. Fuermaier;Philippa Hüpen;Stefanie M. De Vries;Morgana Müller

  • Subjective and objective assessment of executive functions in Parkinson's disease

    Janneke Koerts;Janneke Koerts;Lara Tucha;Klaus L. Leenders;Marije van Beilen

  • Intraindividual variability in inhibitory function in adults with ADHD - an ex-Gaussian approach

    Dennis Gmehlin;Anselm B. M. Fuermaier;Stephan Walther;Rudolf Debelak

  • Detection of feigned attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Lara Tucha;Anselm B.M. Fuermaier;Janneke Koerts;Yvonne Groen

  • The role of time on task performance in modifying the effects of gum chewing on attention.

    Lara Tucha;William Simpson

  • Utility of cognitive neuropsychological assessment in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Klaus W. Lange;Joachim Hauser;Katharina M. Lange;Ewelina Makulska-Gertruda

Frequent Co-Authors

Oliver Tucha
Oliver Tucha University of Rostock
Janneke Koerts
Janneke Koerts University of Groningen
Anselm B. M. Fuermaier
Anselm B. M. Fuermaier University of Groningen
Matthias Weisbrod
Matthias Weisbrod Heidelberg University
Susanne Walitza
Susanne Walitza University of Zurich
Eddy A. Van der Zee
Eddy A. Van der Zee University of Groningen
Dick de Waard
Dick de Waard University of Groningen
Wiebo Brouwer
Wiebo Brouwer University of Groningen
Karel Brookhuis
Karel Brookhuis University of Groningen
Klaus L. Leenders
Klaus L. Leenders University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and career opportunities. One of the most popular pathways is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which requires specific education and credentials. Regardless of where you are located, you’ll need to meet state and local requirements for BCBA licensure. For example, you can review the Louisville bcba requirements to understand what’s needed in that area.

Requirements can vary based on your location, so it’s helpful to explore regional details. In Texas, the Lubbock bcba education requirements might differ from those in other cities. Similarly, aspiring professionals can read about becoming a bcba in Madison or check out the Memphis bcba education requirements to compare pathways.

Many universities now offer flexible online psychology degrees, making it easier to work toward your career goals from anywhere. By understanding local licensure and education requirements, you can better plan your studies and advance toward a rewarding career in behavior analysis or other psychology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Lara Tucha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles