World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3089 2845 1758 1583 156 17974

Meredith E. Coles publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Meredith E. Coles between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Meredith E. Coles published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2014. 2 of the 159 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2014. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1990 2025

159 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Meredith E. Coles: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 4
1999 1
2000 3
2001 7
2002 6
2003 2
2004 4
2005 9
2006 9
2007 7
2008 9
2009 7
2010 7
2011 5
2012 10
2013 5
2014 13
2015 8
2016 7
2017 6
2018 4
2019 2
2020 10
2021 5
2022 4
2023 1
2024 0
2025 2
Total 159
Download as CSV

Meredith E. Coles publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meredith E. Coles sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 156 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 156
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Meredith E. Coles D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meredith E. Coles sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Meredith E. Coles is affiliated with Binghamton University in the United States and has a primary research focus within the field of psychology.

Their research contributions predominantly lie in the areas of clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, and public health.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Meredith E. Coles has published numerous papers, some of the recent and notable works include:

  • Sleep duration and timing in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): evidence for circadian phase delay, 2020, Sleep Medicine
  • Delayed sleep timing and circadian rhythms in pregnancy and transdiagnostic symptoms associated with postpartum depression, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Morning light therapy in adults with Tourette's disorder, 2021, Journal of Neurology
  • Sleep and chronotype in adults with persistent tic disorders, 2022, Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • OCD during COVID-19: Understanding clinical and non-clinical anxiety in the community, 2021, Psychiatry Research

The venues in which Meredith E. Coles frequently publishes include:

  • SLEEP
  • Sleep Medicine
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Journal of Neurology
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology

Frequent coauthors collaborating on research projects with Meredith E. Coles are:

  • Elyse Stewart
  • Emily J. Ricketts
  • Helen J. Burgess
  • John Piacentini
  • Christopher S. Colwell

Best Publications

  • Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: Development and initial validation of the anxiety sensitivity index-3

    Steven Taylor;Michael J. Zvolensky;Brian J. Cox;Brett Deacon

  • The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: a comparison of the psychometric properties of self-report and clinician-administered formats

    D. M. Fresco;M. E. Coles;R. G. Heimberg;M. R. Liebowitz

  • The Validation of a New Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Scale: The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory

    Edna B. Foa;Michael J. Kozak;Paul M. Salkovskis;Meredith E. Coles

  • Negative interpretation bias in social phobia

    Nader Amin;Edna B. Foa;Meredith E. Coles

  • Impact of obsessive-compulsive disorder on quality of life

    Jane L. Eisen;Maria A. Mancebo;Anthony Pinto;Meredith E. Coles

  • A comparison of intolerance of uncertainty in analogue obsessive-compulsive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder.

    Robert M. Holaway;Richard G. Heimberg;Meredith E. Coles

  • “Not just right experiences”: perfectionism, obsessive–compulsive features and general psychopathology

    Meredith E. Coles;Randy O. Frost;Richard G. Heimberg;Josée Rhéaume

  • Screening for social anxiety disorder with the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale.

    Nina K. Rytwinski;David M. Fresco;Richard G. Heimberg;Meredith E. Coles

  • Memory biases in the anxiety disorders: Current status

    Meredith E Coles;Richard G Heimberg

  • Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in body dysmorphic disorder.

    Katharine A. Phillips;Meredith E. Coles;William Menard;Shirley Yen

  • The relationship between memories for childhood teasing and anxiety and depression in adulthood.

    Deborah A. Roth;Meredith E. Coles;Richard G. Heimberg

  • Automatic activation and strategic avoidance of threat-relevant information in social phobia

    Nader Amir;Edna B. Foa;Meredith E. Coles

  • Development and Validation of a Child Version of the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory

    Edna B. Foa;Meredith Coles;Jonathan D. Huppert;Radhika V. Pasupuleti

  • Insight in obsessive compulsive disorder and body dysmorphic disorder.

    Jane L Eisen;Katharine A Phillips;Meredith E Coles;Steven A Rasmussen

  • Cognitive-behavioral treatment of pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open clinical trial.

    Martin E. Franklin;Michael J. Kozak;Laurie A. Cashman;Meredith E. Coles

  • Barriers to treatment seeking for anxiety disorders: initial data on the role of mental health literacy.

    Meredith E. Coles;Shannon L. Coleman

  • Not just right experiences and obsessive-compulsive features: experimental and self-monitoring perspectives.

    Meredith E. Coles;Richard G. Heimberg;Randy O. Frost;Gail Steketee

  • Adolescent Mental Health Literacy: Young People's Knowledge of Depression and Social Anxiety Disorder

    Meredith E. Coles;Ariel Ravid;Brandon Gibb;Daniel George-Denn

  • Reported history of childhood abuse and young adults' information-processing biases for facial displays of emotion.

    Brandon E. Gibb;Casey A. Schofield;Meredith E. Coles

  • Assessing obsessive compulsive symptoms and cognitions on the internet: Evidence for the comparability of paper and Internet administration ☆

    Meredith E. Coles;Laura M. Cook;Thomas R. Blake

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard G. Heimberg
Richard G. Heimberg Temple University
Brandon E. Gibb
Brandon E. Gibb Binghamton University
Edna B. Foa
Edna B. Foa University of Pennsylvania
Jonathan S. Abramowitz
Jonathan S. Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Katharine A. Phillips
Katharine A. Phillips Cornell University
Eric A. Storch
Eric A. Storch Baylor College of Medicine
Nader Amir
Nader Amir San Diego State University
Steven A. Rasmussen
Steven A. Rasmussen Brown University
Martin E. Franklin
Martin E. Franklin University of Pennsylvania
Richard Moulding
Richard Moulding Deakin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology as a field of study opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities, especially within social services and mental health. Many students opt to complement their psychology education with a related degree, such as social work. Earning an online degree in social work can offer flexibility and direct pathways into careers that support individuals and communities.

If you’re searching for top programs, you might want to consider the best social work degrees in Portland or examine options in other cities known for their strong social work education, such as the best social work degrees in Salt Lake City. Regional programs like the top social work degrees in San Diego and best social work degrees in Tacoma also offer quality online and campus-based pathways for further study.

Careers stemming from these degrees include clinical social work, counseling, and community outreach. Many programs feature practical training and networking opportunities, making them a strong complement for those studying psychology and seeking to make a tangible impact in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Meredith E. Coles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles