World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
25206
World Ranking
11910
National Ranking
6110

Psychology

D-Index
91
Citations
25248
World Ranking
927
National Ranking
585

Robert L. Stout publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Stout sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 218 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert L. Stout D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Stout sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert L. Stout is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, Health Professions, and Psychology, with additional focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Health.

The scientist's work concentrates on several topics including Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Homelessness and Social Issues, Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, Youth Substance Use and School Attendance, Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare, and Child Welfare and Adoption.

Frequent publication venues for Robert L. Stout include:

  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Systematic Reviews
  • Depression and Anxiety

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Robert L. Stout encompass:

  • Recovery community centers: Characteristics of new attendees and longitudinal investigation of the predictors and effects of participation, 2021, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • One-Stop Shopping for Recovery: An Investigation of Participant Characteristics and Benefits Derived From U.S. Recovery Community Centers, 2020, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Indigenous perspectives on wellness and health in Canada: study protocol for a scoping review, 2020, Systematic Reviews
  • A randomized trial of an integrated cognitive behavioral treatment protocol for adolescents receiving home-based services for co-occurring disorders, 2020, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Treatment of anger problems in previously deployed post-911 veterans: A randomized controlled trial, 2021, Depression and Anxiety

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including John F. Kelly, Bettina B. Hoeppner, Shirley Yen, Jeffrey Hunt, and Nilofar Fallah-Sohy.

Best Publications

  • Ten-Year Course of Borderline Personality Disorder: Psychopathology and Function From the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study

    John G Gunderson;Robert L. Stout;Thomas H. McGlashan;M. Tracie Shea;M. Tracie Shea

  • Functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.

    Andrew E. Skodol;John G. Gunderson;Thomas H. McGlashan;Ingrid R. Dyck

  • The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: baseline Axis I/II and II/II diagnostic co-occurrence.

    Thomas H. McGlashan;C. M. Grilo;A. E. Skodol;J. G. Gunderson

  • The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study (CLPS): Overview and implications

    Andrew E. Skodol;John G. Gunderson;M. Tracie Shea;Thomas H. McGlashan

  • Project MATCH: Rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching patients to alcoholism treatment

    M. E. Mattson;J. P. Allen;W. R. Miller;R. K. Hester

  • Impact of obsessive-compulsive disorder on quality of life

    Jane L. Eisen;Maria A. Mancebo;Anthony Pinto;Meredith E. Coles

  • Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity

    J. Allen;R. F. Anton;T. F. Babor;J. Carbonari

  • Ensuring balanced distribution of prognostic factors in treatment outcome research.

    R L Stout;P W Wirtz;J P Carbonari;F K Del Boca

  • Two-Year Prevalence and Stability of Individual DSM-IV Criteria for Schizotypal, Borderline, Avoidant, and Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorders: Toward a Hybrid Model of Axis II Disorders

    Thomas H. McGlashan;Carlos M. Grilo;Charles A. Sanislow;Elizabeth Ralevski

  • Stability of functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder over two years

    Andrew E. Skodol;Maria E. Pagano;Donna S. Bender;M. Tracie Shea

  • Confirmatory factor analysis of DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder: findings from the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study.

    Charles A. Sanislow;Carlos M. Grilo;Leslie C. Morey;Donna S. Bender

  • Project MATCH secondary a priori hypotheses

    J. Allen;R. F. Anton;T. F. Babor;J. Carbonari

  • How do people recover from alcohol dependence? A systematic review of the research on mechanisms of behavior change in Alcoholics Anonymous

    John Francis Kelly;Molly Magill;Robert Lauren Stout

  • Network support for drinking, Alcoholics Anonymous and long‐term matching effects

    Richard Longabaugh;Philip W. Wirtz;Allen Zweben;Robert L. Stout

  • Two-Year Stability and Change of Schizotypal, Borderline, Avoidant, and Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorders

    Carlos M. Grilo;Charles A. Sanislow;John G. Gunderson;Maria E. Pagano

  • The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: Development, aims, design, and sample characteristics.

    John G. Gunderson;M. Tracie Shea;Andrew E. Skodol;Thomas H. McGlashan

  • Determining the relative importance of the mechanisms of behavior change within Alcoholics Anonymous: a multiple mediator analysis

    John F. Kelly;Bettina Hoeppner;Robert L. Stout;Maria Elizabeth Pagano

  • Short-term diagnostic stability of schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.

    M. Tracie Shea;Robert Stout;John Gunderson;Leslie C. Morey

  • Comparative effectiveness of three types of spouse involvement in outpatient behavioral alcoholism treatment.

    Barbara S. McCrady;Nora E. Noel;David B. Abrams;Robert L. Stout

  • Dimensional Representations of DSM-IV Personality Disorders: Relationships to Functional Impairment

    Andrew E. Skodol;John M. Oldham;Donna S. Bender;Ingrid R. Dyck

  • Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity

    J. P. Allen;M. E. Mattson;W. R. Miller;J. S. Tonigan

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlos M. Grilo
Carlos M. Grilo Yale University
Andrew E. Skodol
Andrew E. Skodol University of Arizona
John G. Gunderson
John G. Gunderson Harvard University
M. Tracie Shea
M. Tracie Shea Brown University
Thomas H. McGlashan
Thomas H. McGlashan Yale University
Leslie C. Morey
Leslie C. Morey Texas A&M University
Mary C. Zanarini
Mary C. Zanarini Harvard University
Richard Longabaugh
Richard Longabaugh Brown University
Shirley Yen
Shirley Yen Harvard Medical School
Charles A. Sanislow
Charles A. Sanislow Wesleyan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology can open the door to a variety of related online degrees and exciting career pathways. Social work, in particular, is a popular field that complements psychological studies, enabling students to support diverse communities through hands-on service and advocacy.

When considering the next step, it’s important to review the top social work degrees in USA. These programs provide a strong foundation for those aiming to make a difference on both local and national levels. If you’re seeking location-specific options, check out the best social work degree programs in Utah, the best social work programs in Virginia, and the top social work degrees in West Virginia.

Graduates may pursue roles in counseling, case management, mental health services, or advocacy organizations. Online degree pathways allow for flexible learning and can accelerate entry into meaningful careers. Carefully research and compare programs to find the best fit for your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Robert L. Stout

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles