World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
118
Citations
49494
World Ranking
278
National Ranking
176

Andrew E. Skodol publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew E. Skodol sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 320 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Andrew E. Skodol D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew E. Skodol sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew E. Skodol is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research centers primarily on psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, as well as related areas such as philosophy, experimental and cognitive psychology, and sociology and political science.

The main topics of their work encompass personality disorders and psychopathology, mental health and psychiatry, psychotherapy techniques and applications, mental health research topics, schizophrenia research and treatment, suicide and self-harm studies, and bipolar disorder and treatment.

Skodol's recent publications reflect these interests. Selected papers include: "The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in psychiatric practice and research" (2022, Psychological Medicine), "Criterion A: Level of personality functioning in the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders" (2022, Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment), "Association of Borderline Personality Disorder Criteria With Suicide Attempts" (2020, JAMA Psychiatry), "The Prognostic Utility of Personality Traits Versus Past Psychiatric Diagnoses: Predicting Future Mental Health and Functioning" (2021, Clinical Psychological Science), and "The Incremental Utility of Criteria A and B of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders for Predicting DSM-IV/DSM-5 Section II Personality Disorders" (2022, Journal of Personality Assessment).

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Skodol include Leslie C. Morey, Christopher J. Hopwood, Roman Kotov, Camilo J. Ruggero, and Monika A. Waszczuk.

The primary venues where Skodol has published their research are Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment, Psychological Medicine, JAMA Psychiatry, Clinical Psychological Science, and Journal of Personality Assessment.

Best Publications

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;Thomas M. Achenbach

  • Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5.

    Robert F. Krueger;Jaime Derringer;Kristian E. Markon;David Watson

  • Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: The causation-selection issue.

    Bruce P. Dohrenwend;Itzhak Levav;Patrick E. Shrout;Sharon Schwartz

  • The borderline diagnosis I: psychopathology, comorbidity, and personality structure.

    Andrew E Skodol;John G Gunderson;John G Gunderson;Bruce Pfohl;Thomas A Widiger

  • The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: reliability of axis I and II diagnoses.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Andrew E. Skodol;Donna S. Bender;Regina T. Dolan

  • Treatment utilization by patients with personality disorders

    Donna S. Bender;Regina T. Dolan;Andrew E. Skodol;Charles A. Sanislow

  • Ten-Year Course of Borderline Personality Disorder: Psychopathology and Function From the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study

    John G Gunderson;Robert L. Stout;Thomas H. McGlashan;M. Tracie Shea;M. Tracie Shea

  • Functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.

    Andrew E. Skodol;John G. Gunderson;Thomas H. McGlashan;Ingrid R. Dyck

  • An invariant dimensional liability model of gender differences in mental disorder prevalence: evidence from a national sample.

    Nicholas R. Eaton;Katherine M. Keyes;Robert F. Krueger;Steve Balsis

  • Toward a Model for Assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM–5, Part I: A Review of Theory and Methods

    Donna S Bender;Leslie C Morey;Andrew E Skodol

  • The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: baseline Axis I/II and II/II diagnostic co-occurrence.

    Thomas H. McGlashan;C. M. Grilo;A. E. Skodol;J. G. Gunderson

  • The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study (CLPS): Overview and implications

    Andrew E. Skodol;John G. Gunderson;M. Tracie Shea;Thomas H. McGlashan

  • Childhood maltreatment associated with adult personality disorders: findings from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study

    Cynthia L. Battle;M. Tracie Shea;Dawn M. Johnson;Shirley Yen

  • The borderline diagnosis II: biology, genetics, and clinical course

    Andrew E Skodol;Larry J Siever;W.John Livesley;John G Gunderson

  • Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised: Comparison With Two Structured Interviews

    S E Hyler;A E Skodol;H D Kellman;J M Oldham

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • Two-Year Prevalence and Stability of Individual DSM-IV Criteria for Schizotypal, Borderline, Avoidant, and Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorders: Toward a Hybrid Model of Axis II Disorders

    Thomas H. McGlashan;Carlos M. Grilo;Charles A. Sanislow;Elizabeth Ralevski

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • Comorbidity of axis I and axis II disorders.

    J M Oldham;A E Skodol;H D Kellman;S E Hyler

  • Personality Assessment in DSM--5: Empirical support for rating Severity, Style, and Traits

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Johanna C. Malone;Emily B. Ansell;Charles A. Sanislow

  • Diagnosis of DSM-III-R personality disorders by two structured interviews: patterns of comorbidity.

    Oldham Jm;Skodol Ae;Kellman Hd;Hyler Se

Frequent Co-Authors

John G. Gunderson
John G. Gunderson Harvard University
Carlos M. Grilo
Carlos M. Grilo Yale University
M. Tracie Shea
M. Tracie Shea Brown University
Charles A. Sanislow
Charles A. Sanislow Wesleyan University
Leslie C. Morey
Leslie C. Morey Texas A&M University
Mary C. Zanarini
Mary C. Zanarini Harvard University
Shirley Yen
Shirley Yen Harvard Medical School
Robert L. Stout
Robert L. Stout Brown University
Donna S. Bender
Donna S. Bender Tulane University
Patrick E. Shrout
Patrick E. Shrout New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in Psychology opens doors to various career paths in mental health, counseling, research, and social services. Many students choose online psychology programs for their flexibility and wide-ranging curriculum, making it easier to balance studies with work or other commitments.

If you are considering a career as a mental health counselor, it's important to understand the specific certification and education requirements in your area. For example, learn about the mental health counselor requirements in Virginia Beach and how they might differ from the Washington DC mental health counselor education requirements. Additionally, those interested in practicing in Kansas should explore the Wichita mental health counselor certification requirements. For those heading to the southeast, check the Winston Salem mental health counselor education requirements to ensure you meet local standards.

With the right online degree and a clear understanding of state-specific qualifications, you will be well-prepared for a rewarding career supporting the mental health and well-being of your community.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew E. Skodol

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles