World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 111 857 819 517 490 344 43175
Psychology 112 369 322 234 201 344 44552
Medicine 112 5152 4834 2785 2580 308 44350

Mary C. Zanarini publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary C. Zanarini between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary C. Zanarini published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2019. 13 of the 346 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2019. 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 6 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 3 publications
1986 2025

346 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary C. Zanarini: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 2
1987 3
1988 2
1989 3
1990 4
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 4
1995 1
1996 1
1997 3
1998 5
1999 2
2000 8
2001 8
2002 11
2003 13
2004 20
2005 12
2006 7
2007 13
2008 15
2009 20
2010 14
2011 16
2012 19
2013 12
2014 16
2015 11
2016 5
2017 10
2018 24
2019 27
2020 4
2021 7
2022 1
2023 6
2024 10
2025 3
Total 346
Download as CSV

Mary C. Zanarini publications per year - data summary

  • Mary C. Zanarini, a Psychology scholar from Harvard University, has 346 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 27 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1992, 1993, 1995, 1996 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 8.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.7 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 27 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 34 publications (2.4 per year); 2000-2013: 188 publications (13.4 per year); 2014-2025: 124 publications (10.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mary C. Zanarini publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary C. Zanarini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–350 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 344 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85 344
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary C. Zanarini publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Mary C. Zanarini, a Psychology scholar from Harvard University, records 344 publications - the 91st percentile of the discipline.
  • 91% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Mary C. Zanarini, and about 9% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Mary C. Zanarini ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Mary C. Zanarini D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary C. Zanarini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 112–113 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27 112
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Mary C. Zanarini D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Mary C. Zanarini, a Psychology scholar from Harvard University, records 112 D-Index - the 97th percentile of the discipline.
  • 97% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Mary C. Zanarini, and about 3% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Mary C. Zanarini ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Mary C. Zanarini is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their academic contributions cover a range of topics including:

  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment

Mary C. Zanarini has coauthored extensively with several frequent collaborators, which include:

  • Isabel V. Glass
  • Christina M. Temes
  • Garrett M. Fitzmaurice
  • Frances R. Frankenburg
  • Katherine E. Hein

Their scholarly work has been published in a variety of academic venues, with notable recurring contributions in:

  • Journal of Personality Disorders
  • Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
  • Personality and Mental Health
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Some of the recent significant papers authored or coauthored by Mary C. Zanarini include:

  • Symptomatic Disorders in Adults and Adolescents With Borderline Personality Disorder, 2021, Journal of Personality Disorders
  • Association of Borderline Personality Disorder Criteria With Suicide Attempts, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Parameters of reported childhood sexual abuse and assault in adolescents and adults with borderline personality disorder, 2020, Personality and Mental Health
  • Course and predictors of social security disability insurance in patients with borderline personality disorder over 24 years of prospective follow-up, 2023, Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
  • Levels of Depersonalization and Derealization Reported by Recovered and Non-recovered Borderline Patients Over 20 Years of Prospective Follow-up, 2020, Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Best Publications

  • SeminarBorderline personality disorder

    Klaus Lieb;Mary C Zanarini;Christian Schmahl;Marsha M Linehan

  • Axis I Comorbidity of Borderline Personality Disorder

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;Elyse D. Dubo;Amy E. Sickel

  • The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: reliability of axis I and II diagnoses.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Andrew E. Skodol;Donna S. Bender;Regina T. Dolan

  • Treatment utilization by patients with personality disorders

    Donna S. Bender;Regina T. Dolan;Andrew E. Skodol;Charles A. Sanislow

  • Ten-Year Course of Borderline Personality Disorder: Psychopathology and Function From the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study

    John G Gunderson;Robert L. Stout;Thomas H. McGlashan;M. Tracie Shea;M. Tracie Shea

  • Reported pathological childhood experiences associated with the development of borderline personality disorder

    Mary C. Zanarini;A. A. Williams;R. E. Lewis;R. B. Reich

  • Functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.

    Andrew E. Skodol;John G. Gunderson;Thomas H. McGlashan;Ingrid R. Dyck

  • A Screening Measure for BPD: The McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD)

    Mary C. Zanarini;A. Anna Vujanovic;Elizabeth A. Parachini;Jennifer L. Boulanger

  • The Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines: Discriminating BPD from other Axis II Disorders

    Mary C. Zanarini;John G. Gunderson;Frances R. Frankenburg;Deborah L. Chauncey

  • The longitudinal course of borderline psychopathology: 6-year prospective follow-up of the phenomenology of borderline personality disorder.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;John Hennen;Kenneth R. Silk

  • The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: baseline Axis I/II and II/II diagnostic co-occurrence.

    Thomas H. McGlashan;C. M. Grilo;A. E. Skodol;J. G. Gunderson

  • The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study (CLPS): Overview and implications

    Andrew E. Skodol;John G. Gunderson;M. Tracie Shea;Thomas H. McGlashan

  • Childhood maltreatment associated with adult personality disorders: findings from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study

    Cynthia L. Battle;M. Tracie Shea;Dawn M. Johnson;Shirley Yen

  • Axis I comorbidity in patients with borderline personality disorder: 6-year follow-up and prediction of time to remission.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;John Hennen;D. Bradford Reich

  • Childhood experiences of borderline patients.

    Mary C. Zanarini;John G. Gunderson;John G. Gunderson;Margaret F. Marino;Margaret F. Marino;Elizabeth O. Schwartz;Elizabeth O. Schwartz

  • Attainment and maintenance of reliability of Axis I and II Disorders over the course of a longitudinal study

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg

  • Prediction of the 10-year course of borderline personality disorder.

    Mary C Zanarini;Frances R Frankenburg;John Hennen;D Bradford Reich

  • Attainment and stability of sustained symptomatic remission and recovery among patients with borderline personality disorder and axis II comparison subjects: a 16-year prospective follow-up study.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;D. Bradford Reich;Garrett Fitzmaurice

  • The subsyndromal phenomenology of borderline personality disorder: A 10-year follow-up study

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;D. Bradford Reich;Kenneth R. Silk

  • Zanarini Rating Scale For Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD): A Continuous Measure of DSM-IV Borderline Psychopathology

    Mary C. Zanarini

  • Severity of reported childhood sexual abuse and its relationship to severity of borderline psychopathology and psychosocial impairment among borderline inpatients.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Lynne Yong;Frances R. Frankenburg;John Hennen

  • Two-Year Prevalence and Stability of Individual DSM-IV Criteria for Schizotypal, Borderline, Avoidant, and Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorders: Toward a Hybrid Model of Axis II Disorders

    Thomas H. McGlashan;Carlos M. Grilo;Charles A. Sanislow;Elizabeth Ralevski

Frequent Co-Authors

Frances R. Frankenburg
Frances R. Frankenburg Boston University
John G. Gunderson
John G. Gunderson Harvard University
Garrett M. Fitzmaurice
Garrett M. Fitzmaurice Harvard University
Carlos M. Grilo
Carlos M. Grilo Yale University
Charles A. Sanislow
Charles A. Sanislow Wesleyan University
M. Tracie Shea
M. Tracie Shea Brown University
Thomas H. McGlashan
Thomas H. McGlashan Yale University
Leslie C. Morey
Leslie C. Morey Texas A&M University
Shirley Yen
Shirley Yen Harvard Medical School
Andrew E. Skodol
Andrew E. Skodol University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to many rewarding online degrees and career pathways, especially in fields closely related to mental health and well-being. A popular choice among psychology graduates is pursuing a degree in social work, which combines an understanding of human behavior with practical tools for community support and crisis intervention.

For those interested in region-specific programs, you can explore some of the best social work degrees in Columbus, which offer strong field placement opportunities and comprehensive coursework. If you prefer a vibrant urban setting, the best social work degrees in Houston provide diverse specializations that cater to varied student interests and local community needs.

Students located further west might be interested in the best social work degrees in Idaho, known for their affordable tuition and flexible online options. Those in the southern U.S. can look into the best social work degree programs in Jackson, with curricula focused on preparing graduates for both local and national career opportunities.

Careers in counseling, case management, and community outreach are all possible with these related degree pathways, offering psychology students many options to make a meaningful difference.

Best Scientists Citing Mary C. Zanarini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles