World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
83
Citations
26229
World Ranking
1271
National Ranking
770

Aidan G. C. Wright publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aidan G. C. Wright sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 308 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Aidan G. C. Wright D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aidan G. C. Wright sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Aidan G. C. Wright is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States, specializing in the field of Psychology. Their research primarily focuses on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Philosophy, and Social Psychology. The main topics covered in their work include Mental Health Research Topics, Personality Disorders and Psychopathology, Personality Traits and Psychology, Mental Health and Psychiatry, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications, and Digital Mental Health Interventions.

The scientist has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications, with frequent appearances in several key journals and publication venues. These include:

  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • European Journal of Personality
  • Clinical Psychological Science
  • Journal of Personality
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science

Aidan G. C. Wright has collaborated regularly with other researchers in the field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Whitney R. Ringwald
  • Michael N. Hallquist
  • Aleksandra Kaurin
  • Robert F. Krueger
  • Miriam K. Forbes

Their recent notable papers consist of:

  • "The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence," published in 2021 in Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • "Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum," published in 2020 in World Psychiatry
  • "Personalized Models of Psychopathology," published in 2020 in Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • "Narcissism Today: What We Know and What We Need to Learn," published in 2021 in Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • "Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum," published in 2021 in World Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;Thomas M. Achenbach

  • Initial Construction and Validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory

    Aaron L. Pincus;Emily B. Ansell;Claudia A. Pimentel;Nicole M. Cain

  • The Hierarchical Structure of DSM-5 Pathological Personality Traits

    Aidan G.C. Wright;Katherine M. Thomas;Christopher J. Hopwood;Kristian E. Markon

  • The Structure of Personality Pathology: Both General ('g') and Specific ('s') Factors?

    Carla Sharp;Aidan G. C. Wright;J. Christopher Fowler;B. Christopher Frueh

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence.

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;David C. Cicero

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Katherine M. Thomas;Kristian E. Markon;Aidan G. C. Wright

  • Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability.

    Miriam K. Forbes;Aidan G. C. Wright;Kristian E. Markon;Robert F. Krueger

  • The structure of psychopathology: Toward an expanded quantitative empirical model.

    Aidan G. C. Wright;Robert F. Krueger;Megan J. Hobbs;Kristian E. Markon

  • The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains.

    Katherine M. Thomas;Matthew M. Yalch;Robert F. Krueger;Aidan G. C. Wright

  • On the structure of personality disorder traits: conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models.

    Aidan G. C. Wright;Leonard J. Simms

  • The interpersonal core of personality pathology.

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Aidan G.C. Wright;Emily B. Ansell;Aaron L. Pincus

  • The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • The higher order factor structure and gender invariance of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory.

    Aidan G. C. Wright;Mark R. Lukowitsky;Aaron L. Pincus;David E. Conroy

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum

    Unknown

  • Narcissistic Grandiosity and Narcissistic Vulnerability in Psychotherapy

    Aaron L. Pincus;Nicole M. Cain;Aidan G. C. Wright

  • Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice

    Camilo J. Ruggero;Roman Kotov;Christopher J. Hopwood;Michael First

  • Bridging the Nomothetic and Idiographic Approaches to the Analysis of Clinical Data

    Adriene M. Beltz;Aidan G. C. Wright;Briana N. Sprague;Peter C. M. Molenaar

  • Longitudinal validation of general and specific structural features of personality pathology.

    Aidan G C Wright;Christopher J Hopwood;Andrew E Skodol;Leslie C Morey

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum.

    Roman Kotov;Katherine G Jonas;William T Carpenter;Michael N Dretsch

  • Personalized Models of Psychopathology.

    Aidan G C Wright;William C Woods

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher J. Hopwood
Christopher J. Hopwood University of Zurich
Aaron L. Pincus
Aaron L. Pincus Pennsylvania State University
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Michael N. Hallquist
Michael N. Hallquist Pennsylvania State University
Paul A. Pilkonis
Paul A. Pilkonis University of Pittsburgh
Kristian E. Markon
Kristian E. Markon University of Iowa
Johannes Zimmermann
Johannes Zimmermann University of Kassel
Stephanie D. Stepp
Stephanie D. Stepp University of Pittsburgh
Stephen B. Manuck
Stephen B. Manuck University of Pittsburgh
Miriam K. Forbes
Miriam K. Forbes Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open the door to various online programs and rewarding career pathways. Many students choose online psychology degrees for their flexibility and convenience, allowing them to balance study with personal commitments. These degrees provide foundational knowledge and skills essential for roles in counseling, mental health, and therapy.

If you aspire to become a licensed therapist, it’s important to understand the educational and licensing requirements for your location. For example, the licensed therapist requirements in Chesapeake involve earning a graduate degree in counseling or psychology, completing clinical hours, and passing a national exam. Similarly, you can explore the licensed therapist requirements in Chicago, which outline state-specific coursework and supervised practice.

Prospective therapists in other regions, such as California, should review the Chula Vista licensed therapist education requirements. In Ohio, the Cincinnati licensed therapist education requirements detail similar prerequisites tailored to local regulations. Researching these requirements ensures you stay on track as you pursue your online degree and take the next steps in your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Aidan G. C. Wright

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles