World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5299 4916 2895 2623 175 7992

Stephanie D. Stepp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephanie D. Stepp between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephanie D. Stepp published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2017. 13 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2017. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
2003 2025

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephanie D. Stepp: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 0
2007 1
2008 3
2009 2
2010 5
2011 7
2012 15
2013 12
2014 15
2015 16
2016 12
2017 21
2018 10
2019 11
2020 13
2021 15
2022 7
2023 7
2024 5
2025 8
Total 191
Download as CSV

Stephanie D. Stepp publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie D. Stepp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 175
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephanie D. Stepp D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie D. Stepp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephanie D. Stepp is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States and primarily conducts research in the field of psychology, with a strong emphasis on clinical psychology. Their work spans several subfields including experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and education.

Their research addresses key topics within psychology, focusing notably on child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, personality disorders and psychopathology, mental health research topics, suicide and self-harm studies, psychotherapy techniques and applications, child abuse and trauma, and attachment and relationship dynamics.

Stephanie D. Stepp has contributed to numerous peer-reviewed publications, with recent papers including:

  • Affective Dynamics Across Internalizing and Externalizing Dimensions of Psychopathology, 2020, Clinical Psychological Science
  • Personalized models of psychopathology as contextualized dynamic processes: An example from individuals with borderline personality disorder, 2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Are We Thinking about the Same Disorder? A Trifactor Model Approach to Understand Parents' and Their Adolescents' Reports of Borderline Personality Pathology, 2022, Journal of Personality Assessment
  • A Multi-Method Investigation of Parental Responses to Youth Emotion: Prospective Effects on Emotion Dysregulation and Reactive Aggression in Daily Life, 2021, Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
  • Adolescent suicide risk and experiences of dissociation in daily life, 2020, Psychiatry Research

Their frequent coauthors include Amy L. Byrd, Alison E. Hipwell, Vera Vine, Kate Keenan, and Salome Vanwoerden. Collaboration with these researchers is indicated by multiple joint publications.

Stephanie D. Stepp regularly publishes in the following venues:

  • Development and Psychopathology
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
  • Clinical Psychological Science
  • Psychiatry Research
  • Psychological Medicine

Best Publications

  • Children of Mothers with Borderline Personality Disorder: Identifying Parenting Behaviors as Potential Targets for Intervention

    Stephanie D. Stepp;Diana J. Whalen;Paul A. Pilkonis;Alison E. Hipwell

  • Borderline personality disorder features predict negative outcomes 2 years later.

    Courtney Bagge;Angela Nickell;Stephanie Stepp;Christine Durrett

  • Trajectories of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Oppositional Defiant Disorder Symptoms as Precursors of Borderline Personality Disorder Symptoms in Adolescent Girls

    Stephanie D. Stepp;Jeffrey D. Burke;Alison E. Hipwell;Rolf Loeber

  • The Pittsburgh Girls Study: Overview and Initial Findings

    Kate Keenan;Alison Hipwell;Tammy Chung;Stephanie Stepp

  • Criterion validity of the general factor of psychopathology in a prospective study of girls

    Benjamin B. Lahey;Paul J. Rathouz;Kate Keenan;Stephanie D. Stepp

  • The effect of dialectical behavior therapy skills use on borderline personality disorder features

    Stephanie D. Stepp;Amee J. Epler;Seungmin Jahng;Timothy J. Trull

  • A systematic review of risk factors prospectively associated with borderline personality disorder: Taking stock and moving forward.

    Stephanie D. Stepp;Sophie A. Lazarus;Amy L. Byrd

  • Prospective associations between features of borderline personality disorder, emotion dysregulation, and aggression.

    Lori N. Scott;Stephanie D. Stepp;Paul A. Pilkonis

  • The clinical utility of the proposed DSM-5 callous-unemotional subtype of conduct disorder in young girls.

    Dustin Pardini;Stephanie Stepp;Alison Hipwell;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • Parent and peer relationships as longitudinal predictors of adolescent non-suicidal self-injury onset

    Sarah E. Victor;Alison E. Hipwell;Stephanie D. Stepp;Lori N. Scott

  • Identifying the irritability dimension of ODD: Application of a modified bifactor model across five large community samples of children

    Jeffrey D. Burke;Khrista Boylan;Richard Rowe;Eric Duku

  • Reciprocal effects of parenting and borderline personality disorder symptoms in adolescent girls.

    Stephanie D. Stepp;Diana J. Whalen;Lori N. Scott;Maureen Zalewski

  • The Role of Attachment Styles and Interpersonal Problems in Suicide-Related Behaviors

    Stephanie D. Stepp;Jennifer Q. Morse;Kirsten E. Yaggi;Sarah K. Reynolds

  • The effect of pathological narcissism on interpersonal and affective processes in social interactions.

    Aidan G C Wright;Stephanie D Stepp;Lori N Scott;Michael N Hallquist

  • Non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal ideation as predictors of suicide attempts in adolescent girls: a multi-wave prospective study.

    Lori N. Scott;Paul A. Pilkonis;Alison E. Hipwell;Kate Keenan

  • Interpersonal and emotional experiences of social interactions in borderline personality disorder.

    Stephanie D. Stepp;Paul A. Pilkonis;Kirsten E. Yaggi;Jennifer Q. Morse

  • Borderline personality disorder symptoms and aggression: A within-person process model.

    Lori N. Scott;Aidan G. C. Wright;Joseph E. Beeney;Sophie A. Lazarus

  • Adolescent Disruptive Behavior and Borderline Personality Disorder Symptoms in Young Adult Men

    Jeffrey D. Burke;Stephanie D. Stepp

  • Attachment and social cognition in borderline personality disorder: Specificity in relation to antisocial and avoidant personality disorders

    Joseph E. Beeney;Stephanie D. Stepp;Michael N. Hallquist;Lori N. Scott

  • Emotion dysregulation as a maintenance factor of borderline personality disorder features.

    Stephanie D. Stepp;Lori N. Scott;Jennifer Q. Morse;Kimberly A. Nolf

  • Stability of borderline personality disorder features in girls.

    Stephanie D. Stepp;Paul A. Pilkonis;Alison E. Hipwell;Rolf Loeber

Frequent Co-Authors

Alison E. Hipwell
Alison E. Hipwell University of Pittsburgh
Paul A. Pilkonis
Paul A. Pilkonis University of Pittsburgh
Kate Keenan
Kate Keenan University of Chicago
Michael N. Hallquist
Michael N. Hallquist Pennsylvania State University
Aidan G. C. Wright
Aidan G. C. Wright University of Pittsburgh
Rolf Loeber
Rolf Loeber University of Pittsburgh
Tammy Chung
Tammy Chung Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Diana J. Whalen
Diana J. Whalen Washington University in St. Louis
Jennifer Q. Morse
Jennifer Q. Morse University of Pittsburgh
Andrea B. Goldschmidt
Andrea B. Goldschmidt University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens a wide range of online degree options and professional pathways. Whether you aim to become a licensed therapist or pursue roles in counseling, social work, or academia, most positions require a blend of formal education and state-specific licensure.

The journey to licensure can differ by location. For example, the licensed therapist requirements in Long Beach include specific coursework, supervised experience, and a state exam. Similarly, aspiring professionals must meet Los Angeles licensed therapist requirements, which emphasize graduate-level education and clinical hours.

Prospective therapists in Kentucky can learn how to become a licensed therapist in Louisville, highlighting the importance of accredited degrees and ongoing professional development. Likewise, detailed steps for becoming a licensed therapist in Lubbock underline the need for clinical training and examination requirements.

As each state has unique guidelines, students considering online psychology programs should review local licensing standards to ensure their degree meets professional criteria where they plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Stephanie D. Stepp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles