World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
9899
World Ranking
6376
National Ranking
3459

Michael N. Hallquist publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael N. Hallquist sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael N. Hallquist D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael N. Hallquist sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael N. Hallquist is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a significant number of publications in clinical and cognitive domains. Hallquist's work spans several subfields including clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, philosophy, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's scholarly output prominently covers topics such as mental health research, personality disorders and psychopathology, functional brain connectivity, mental health and psychiatry, suicide and self-harm studies, neural and behavioral psychology, and psychotherapy techniques and applications.

Hallquist has contributed to various academic journals and publication venues, with a frequent presence in:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Clinical Psychological Science

Recent published papers include:

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence, 2021, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • Three recommendations based on a comparison of the reliability and validity of the predominant models used in research on the empirical structure of psychopathology, 2021, Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  • Integrating a functional view on suicide risk into idiographic statistical models, 2021, Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Rethinking the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Data-Driven Psychological Dimensions, Not Categories, as a Framework for Mental-Health Research, Treatment, and Training, 2021, Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • Ventromedial prefrontal value signals and functional connectivity during decision-making in suicidal behavior and impulsivity, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology

Collaboration is a consistent aspect of Hallquist's work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Alexandre Y. Dombrovski
  • Aidan G.C. Wright
  • Timothy A. Allen
  • Alison Schreiber
  • Nathan T. Hall

The spectrum of Hallquist's research topics and interdisciplinary approach reflects an engagement with both clinical and experimental perspectives on mental health and psychopathology.

Best Publications

  • MplusAutomation: An R Package for Facilitating Large-Scale Latent Variable Analyses in Mplus

    Michael N. Hallquist;Joshua F. Wiley

  • The nuisance of nuisance regression: spectral misspecification in a common approach to resting-state fMRI preprocessing reintroduces noise and obscures functional connectivity.

    Michael N. Hallquist;Kai Hwang;Beatriz Luna

  • Developmental Stages and Sex Differences of White Matter and Behavioral Development through Adolescence: A Longitudinal Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Study

    Daniel J. Simmonds;Michael N. Hallquist;Miya Asato;Beatriz Luna

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence.

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;David C. Cicero

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • The Contribution of Network Organization and Integration to the Development of Cognitive Control.

    Scott Marek;Scott Marek;Kai Hwang;William Foran;Michael N. Hallquist;Michael N. Hallquist

  • The Development of Hub Architecture in the Human Functional Brain Network

    Kai Hwang;Michael N. Hallquist;Beatriz Luna

  • lavaan: Latent variable analysis

    Y. Rosseel;D.L. Oberski;J. Byrnes;L. Vanbrabant

  • Graph theory approaches to functional network organization in brain disorders: A critique for a brave new small-world.

    Michael N. Hallquist;Frank G. Hillary;Frank G. Hillary

  • Development of White Matter Microstructure and Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Between the Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex: Associations With Anxiety and Depression.

    Maria Jalbrzikowski;Bart Larsen;Michael N. Hallquist;William Foran

  • Problems with centrality measures in psychopathology symptom networks: Why network psychometrics cannot escape psychometric theory

    Michael N. Hallquist;Aidan G. C. Wright;Peter C. M. Molenaar

  • Social cognitive theories of hypnosis

    Steven Jay Lynn;Irving Kirsch;Michael N. Hallquist

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Plus Hypnosis Intervention to Control Fatigue in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

    Guy H. Montgomery;Daniel David;Maria Kangas;Sheryl Green

  • Fatigue during breast cancer radiotherapy: an initial randomized study of cognitive-behavioral therapy plus hypnosis.

    Guy H. Montgomery;Maria Kangas;Daniel David;Michael N. Hallquist

  • Refining the Phenotype of Borderline Personality Disorder: Diagnostic Criteria and Beyond

    Michael N. Hallquist;Paul A. Pilkonis

  • The effect of pathological narcissism on interpersonal and affective processes in social interactions.

    Aidan G C Wright;Stephanie D Stepp;Lori N Scott;Michael N Hallquist

  • Mindfulness, Acceptance, and Hypnosis: Cognitive and Clinical Perspectives

    Steven Jay Lynn;Lama Surya Das;Michael Nelson Hallquist;John C. Williams

  • Mediators of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients: response expectancies and emotional distress.

    Guy H. Montgomery;Michael N. Hallquist;Julie B. Schnur;Daniel David

  • Emotion dysregulation as a maintenance factor of borderline personality disorder features.

    Stephanie D. Stepp;Lori N. Scott;Jennifer Q. Morse;Kimberly A. Nolf

  • Redefining Phenotypes to Advance Psychiatric Genetics: Implications From Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology

    Monika A. Waszczuk;Nicholas R. Eaton;Robert F. Krueger;Alexander J. Shackman

Frequent Co-Authors

Aidan G. C. Wright
Aidan G. C. Wright University of Pittsburgh
Paul A. Pilkonis
Paul A. Pilkonis University of Pittsburgh
Stephanie D. Stepp
Stephanie D. Stepp University of Pittsburgh
Beatriz Luna
Beatriz Luna University of Pittsburgh
Steven Jay Lynn
Steven Jay Lynn Binghamton University
Katalin Szanto
Katalin Szanto University of Pittsburgh
Jennifer Q. Morse
Jennifer Q. Morse University of Pittsburgh
Miriam K. Forbes
Miriam K. Forbes Macquarie University
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens the door to a variety of online degree options and rewarding career pathways. One popular avenue is Social Work, a field that blends psychological insights with practical support for individuals, families, and communities.

Prospective students can explore top social work programs in USA to find nationally recognized schools that offer flexible online formats. For those interested in specific locations, there are tailored options such as the best social work degree programs in Utah, allowing students to focus on local opportunities and networking.

Regional choices also include the best social work degrees in Virginia and the best social work programs in West Virginia, each offering distinct curriculum and connections within their states.

Whether you are considering licensure in clinical social work or roles in community services, these online programs provide diverse pathways for psychology graduates to make a meaningful impact in people's lives.

Best Scientists Citing Michael N. Hallquist

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles