World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7256 6766 3926 3569 117 7801

Maria Jalbrzikowski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maria Jalbrzikowski between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maria Jalbrzikowski published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2020. 16 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2020. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 7 publications
2005 2025

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maria Jalbrzikowski: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 3
2007 2
2008 2
2009 3
2010 0
2011 2
2012 4
2013 6
2014 6
2015 6
2016 2
2017 10
2018 6
2019 15
2020 17
2021 17
2022 4
2023 13
2024 9
2025 7
Total 135
Download as CSV

Maria Jalbrzikowski publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Jalbrzikowski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 117
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Maria Jalbrzikowski D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Jalbrzikowski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Maria Jalbrzikowski is affiliated with Boston Children's Hospital in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields of study, primarily within Medicine and Neuroscience, with significant focus on subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Molecular Biology, and Epidemiology.

Their work addresses a range of main topics, notably:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Congenital Heart Defects Research
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Coronary Artery Anomalies

Recent publications authored or coauthored by Maria Jalbrzikowski include:

  • Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups, 2020, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Mapping Subcortical Brain Alterations in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Effects of Deletion Size and Convergence With Idiopathic Neuropsychiatric Illness, 2020, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Effects of Copy Number Variations on Brain Structure and Risk for Psychiatric Illness: Large-Scale Studies From the ENIGMA Working Groups on CNVs, 2021, Human Brain Mapping
  • Subtly Altered Topological Asymmetry of Brain Structural Covariance Networks in Autism Spectrum Disorder Across 43 Datasets From the ENIGMA Consortium, 2022, Molecular Psychiatry

Frequent coauthors in their publications include:

  • Rebecca A. Hayes (20 collaborations)
  • Leila Kushan (11 collaborations)
  • Paul M. Thompson (10 collaborations)
  • Carrie E. Bearden (10 collaborations)
  • Rebecca Cooper (9 collaborations)

Their research has been published frequently in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) - 15 publications
  • Biological Psychiatry - 12 publications
  • Human Brain Mapping - 4 publications
  • American Journal of Psychiatry - 3 publications
  • Molecular Psychiatry - 3 publications

Best Publications

  • Psychiatric disorders from childhood to adulthood in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: results from the International Consortium on Brain and Behavior in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

    Maude Schneider;Martin Debbané;Anne S. Bassett;Eva W.C. Chow

  • Cortical and Subcortical Brain Morphometry Differences Between Patients With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Healthy Individuals Across the Lifespan: Results From the ENIGMA ASD Working Group

    Daan van Rooij;Evdokia Anagnostou;Celso Arango;Guillaume Auzias

  • Subcortical visual dysfunction in schizophrenia drives secondary cortical impairments

    Pamela D. Butler;Pamela D. Butler;Pamela D. Butler;Antigona Martinez;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe;Dongsoo Kim

  • Altered structural brain asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder in a study of 54 datasets

    Merel C. Postema;Daan van Rooij;Evdokia Anagnostou;Celso Arango

  • Cognitive Decline Preceding the Onset of Psychosis in Patients With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome

    Jacob A. S. Vorstman;Elemi J. Breetvelt;Sasja N. Duijff;Stephan Eliez

  • Magnocellular pathway impairment in schizophrenia: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Antígona Martínez;Steven A. Hillyard;Elisa C. Dias;Donald J. Hagler

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders

    Yash Patel;Nadine Parker;Jean Shin;Derek Howard

  • Development of White Matter Microstructure and Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Between the Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex: Associations With Anxiety and Depression.

    Maria Jalbrzikowski;Bart Larsen;Michael N. Hallquist;William Foran

  • The Neural Substrates of Impaired Prosodic Detection in Schizophrenia and Its Sensorial Antecedents

    David I. Leitman;Matthew J. Hoptman;John J. Foxe;Erica Saccente

  • Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups

    Premika S W Boedhoe;Daan van Rooij;Martine Hoogman;Jos W R Twisk

  • Large-scale mapping of cortical alterations in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: Convergence with idiopathic psychosis and effects of deletion size.

    Daqiang Sun;Daqiang Sun;Christopher R. K. Ching;Christopher R. K. Ching;Christopher R. K. Ching;Amy Lin;Amy Lin;Jennifer K. Forsyth;Jennifer K. Forsyth

  • Impairments in generation of early-stage transient visual evoked potentials to magno- and parvocellular-selective stimuli in schizophrenia.

    Isaac Schechter;Pamela D. Butler;Pamela D. Butler;Vance M. Zemon;Vance M. Zemon;Nadine Revheim

  • Sensory Contributions to Impaired Emotion Processing in Schizophrenia

    Pamela D. Butler;Pamela D. Butler;Pamela D. Butler;Ilana Y. Abeles;Ilana Y. Abeles;Nicole G. Weiskopf;Arielle Tambini

  • Reading impairment and visual processing deficits in schizophrenia.

    Nadine Revheim;Pamela D. Butler;Pamela D. Butler;Isaac Schechter;Maria Jalbrzikowski

  • Using common genetic variation to examine phenotypic expression and risk prediction in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

    Robert W. Davies;Robert W. Davies;Ania M. Fiksinski;Ania M. Fiksinski;Elemi J. Breetvelt;Nigel M. Williams

  • Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis: An ENIGMA Working Group Mega-analysis.

    Maria Jalbrzikowski;Rebecca A. Hayes;Stephen J. Wood;Dorte Nordholm

  • Genetic contributors to risk of schizophrenia in the presence of a 22q11.2 deletion

    Isabelle Cleynen;Worrawat Engchuan;Matthew S. Hestand;Matthew S. Hestand;Matthew S. Hestand;Tracy Heung;Tracy Heung

  • Exploring predictors of outcome in the psychosis prodrome: implications for early identification and intervention.

    Tara A. Niendam;Maria Jalbrzikowski;Carrie E. Bearden

  • Multisystem component phenotypes of bipolar disorder for genetic investigations of extended pedigrees.

    Scott C. Fears;Barbara Kremeyer;Carmen Araya

  • In support of Bleuler: Objective evidence for increased affective ambivalence in schizophrenia based upon evocative testing

    Fabien Trémeau;Daniel Antonius;John T. Cacioppo;Rachel Ziwich

Frequent Co-Authors

Carrie E. Bearden
Carrie E. Bearden University of California, Los Angeles
Beatriz Luna
Beatriz Luna University of Pittsburgh
Daniel C. Javitt
Daniel C. Javitt Columbia University
Pamela D. Butler
Pamela D. Butler Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Donna M. McDonald-McGinn
Donna M. McDonald-McGinn Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Raquel E. Gur
Raquel E. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Declan G. Murphy
Declan G. Murphy King's College London
Kevin M. Antshel
Kevin M. Antshel Syracuse University
Katherine H. Karlsgodt
Katherine H. Karlsgodt University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career opportunities. Whether you’re interested in clinical work, counseling, research, or human resources, a psychology degree provides a flexible foundation for many paths.

Students often compare programs based on curriculum, accreditation, and career support. For those seeking the best psychology degree programs ranking in Cleveland or the top psychology degrees in Colorado, understanding local and online options is key. If you’re focused on specific locations, you can also look at the top psychology degrees in Colorado Springs or check the best psychology program rankings in Conway to identify standout institutions.

Online study offers flexibility for working adults or those juggling family responsibilities. Today, many accredited universities deliver comprehensive psychology programs online, covering areas like developmental psychology, forensic psychology, and organizational behavior. Graduates can pursue roles as mental health counselors, researchers, or work in fields like social work and education, paving the way for a rewarding and impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Maria Jalbrzikowski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles