World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
135
Citations
57165
World Ranking
237
National Ranking
148

Daniel C. Javitt publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Javitt sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 512 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniel C. Javitt D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Javitt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 135 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel C. Javitt is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their work spans primarily the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, cellular and molecular neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and pharmacology.

The research conducted by Javitt extensively addresses topics such as functional brain connectivity studies, neural dynamics and brain function, schizophrenia research and treatment, neural and behavioral psychology studies, neuroscience and music perception, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, and the treatment of major depression.

Javitt has published numerous papers in prominent scientific journals. Some of their recent publications include:

  • Cognitive Impairment Associated with Schizophrenia: From Pathophysiology to Treatment, 2022, The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
  • A roadmap for development of neuro-oscillations as translational biomarkers for treatment development in neuropsychopharmacology, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology

They have frequently published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biological Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Advances in Neurobiology, and Translational Psychiatry.

Javitt has collaborated extensively with a number of co-authors, including Antígona Martínez, Pejman Sehatpour, Joshua T. Kantrowitz, Gaurav H. Patel, and Jack Grinband. These collaborations have contributed to a substantial body of work across their various fields of study.

Their research often intersects clinical and translational neuroscience, particularly related to schizophrenia and depression, with an emphasis on understanding underlying pathophysiology and treatment modalities. This focus includes studies on neural biomarkers and pharmacological interventions, as reflected in their recent work.

Best Publications

  • Recent advances in the phencyclidine model of schizophrenia.

    Daniel C. Javitt;Stephen R. Zukin

  • Circuit-based framework for understanding neurotransmitter and risk gene interactions in schizophrenia

    John E. Lisman;Joseph T. Coyle;Robert W. Green;Daniel C. Javitt

  • From revolution to evolution: the glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia and its implication for treatment.

    Bita Moghaddam;Daniel Javitt

  • Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study.

    Sophie Molholm;Walter Ritter;Walter Ritter;Micah M Murray;Daniel C Javitt;Daniel C Javitt

  • The NKI-Rockland Sample: A Model for Accelerating the Pace of Discovery Science in Psychiatry.

    Kate Brody Nooner;Kate Brody Nooner;Stanley J. Colcombe;Russell H. Tobe;Maarten Mennes;Maarten Mennes

  • Do You See What I Am Saying? Exploring Visual Enhancement of Speech Comprehension in Noisy Environments

    Lars A. Ross;Dave Saint-Amour;Victoria M. Leavitt;Victoria M. Leavitt;Daniel C. Javitt;Daniel C. Javitt

  • Role of cortical N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in auditory sensory memory and mismatch negativity generation: implications for schizophrenia

    Daniel C. Javitt;Mitchell Steinschneider;Charles E. Schroeder;Joseph C. Arezzo

  • Glutamate and schizophrenia: phencyclidine, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, and dopamine-glutamate interactions.

    Daniel C. Javitt

  • Glutamate as a therapeutic target in psychiatric disorders.

    D C Javitt

  • Ketamine-Induced Deficits in Auditory and Visual Context-Dependent Processing in Healthy Volunteers: Implications for Models of Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia

    Daniel Umbricht;Liselotte Schmid;Rene Koller;Franz X. Vollenweider

  • Efficacy of High-Dose Glycine in the Treatment of Enduring Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia

    Uriel Heresco-Levy;Daniel C. Javitt;Marina Ermilov;Clara Mordel

  • Automated analysis of free speech predicts psychosis onset in high-risk youths

    Gillinder Bedi;Facundo Carrillo;Guillermo A Cecchi;Diego Fernández Slezak

  • When Doors of Perception Close: Bottom-up Models of Disrupted Cognition in Schizophrenia

    Daniel C. Javitt

  • The Cognitive and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia Trial (CONSIST): The Efficacy of Glutamatergic Agents for Negative Symptoms and Cognitive Impairments

    Robert W. Buchanan;Daniel C. Javitt;Stephen R. Marder;Nina R. Schooler

  • Amplitude of low-frequency oscillations in schizophrenia: a resting state fMRI study.

    Matthew J. Hoptman;Matthew J. Hoptman;Xi-Nian Zuo;Pamela D. Butler;Pamela D. Butler;Daniel C. Javitt;Daniel C. Javitt

  • The Spectrotemporal Filter Mechanism of Auditory Selective Attention

    Peter Lakatos;Gabriella Musacchia;Monica N. O’Connel;Arnaud Y. Falchier

  • N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor dysfunction or dysregulation: the final common pathway on the road to schizophrenia?

    Joshua T. Kantrowitz;Daniel C. Javitt

  • Multisensory auditory-somatosensory interactions in early cortical processing revealed by high-density electrical mapping.

    John J Foxe;John J Foxe;Istvan A Morocz;Micah M Murray;Micah M Murray;Beth A Higgins

  • Grabbing your ear: rapid auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignment.

    Micah M. Murray;Sophie Molholm;Christoph M. Michel;Dirk J. Heslenfeld

  • Auditory-somatosensory multisensory processing in auditory association cortex: An fMRI study

    John J. Foxe;Glenn R. Wylie;Antigona Martinez;Antigona Martinez;Charles E. Schroeder

  • Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study

    Sophie Molholm;Walter Ritter;Walter Ritter;Daniel C. Javitt;Daniel C. Javitt;John J. Foxe

Frequent Co-Authors

Pamela D. Butler
Pamela D. Butler Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
John J. Foxe
John J. Foxe University of Rochester
Matthew J. Hoptman
Matthew J. Hoptman Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Charles E. Schroeder
Charles E. Schroeder Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Jeffrey A. Lieberman
Jeffrey A. Lieberman Columbia University
Henry Sershen
Henry Sershen New York University
Antigona Martinez
Antigona Martinez Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Walter Ritter
Walter Ritter Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Micah M. Murray
Micah M. Murray University of Lausanne
Peter Lakatos
Peter Lakatos Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel C. Javitt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles