World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 56 4462 4097 2020 1824 156 14824

Matthew J. Hoptman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew J. Hoptman between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew J. Hoptman published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2020. 9 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2020. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications
1988 2025

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew J. Hoptman: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 4
2003 8
2004 1
2005 6
2006 8
2007 2
2008 5
2009 6
2010 10
2011 9
2012 5
2013 5
2014 6
2015 5
2016 2
2017 5
2018 9
2019 9
2020 12
2021 8
2022 8
2023 10
2024 6
2025 3
Total 160
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Hoptman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Hoptman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 156 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459 156
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Hoptman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Hoptman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357 56
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew J. Hoptman is affiliated with the Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience, medicine, and psychology, with a notable focus on subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's work frequently appears in several journals and publication venues including Biological Psychiatry, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Brain Sciences, Schizophrenia Bulletin, and Neuropsychopharmacology.

Research topics covered by Matthew J. Hoptman include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Treatment of Major Depression

Frequent coauthors include:

  • George S. Alexopoulos
  • Dan V. Iosifescu
  • Lauren E. Oberlin
  • Faith M. Gunning
  • Allison Sparpana

Among their recent papers are:

  • Effects of Antipsychotic Medication on Brain Structure in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Psychotic Features, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Structural brain networks in remitted psychotic depression, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Resting State Functional Connectivity and Outcomes of Psychotherapies for Late-Life Depression, 2020, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Late-life depression accentuates cognitive weaknesses in older adults with small vessel disease, 2021, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Network-level mechanisms underlying effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on visuomotor learning, 2020, NeuroImage

Best Publications

  • Toward discovery science of human brain function

    Bharat B. Biswal;Maarten Mennes;Xi Nian Zuo;Suril Gohel

  • The NKI-Rockland Sample: A Model for Accelerating the Pace of Discovery Science in Psychiatry.

    Kate Brody Nooner;Kate Brody Nooner;Stanley J. Colcombe;Russell H. Tobe;Maarten Mennes;Maarten Mennes

  • Neurocognitive effects of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

    Robert M. Bilder;Robert S. Goldman;Jan Volavka;Pal Czobor

  • Amplitude of low-frequency oscillations in schizophrenia: a resting state fMRI study.

    Matthew J. Hoptman;Matthew J. Hoptman;Xi-Nian Zuo;Pamela D. Butler;Pamela D. Butler;Daniel C. Javitt;Daniel C. Javitt

  • Early-stage visual processing and cortical amplification deficits in schizophrenia.

    Pamela D. Butler;Pamela D. Butler;Vance Zemon;Isaac Schechter;Alice M. Saperstein

  • Neurocognitive correlates of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism in chronic schizophrenia

    Robert M. Bilder;Jan Volavka;Pál Czobor;Anil K. Malhotra

  • Functional Connectivity in the Cognitive Control Network and the Default Mode Network in Late-life Depression

    George S. Alexopoulos;Matthew J. Hoptman;Matthew J. Hoptman;Dora Kanellopoulos;Christopher F. Murphy

  • Visual inspection of independent components: Defining a procedure for artifact removal from fMRI data

    Robert E. Kelly;George S. Alexopoulos;Zhishun Wang;Faith M. Gunning

  • Microstructural White Matter Abnormalities and Remission of Geriatric Depression

    George S. Alexopoulos;Christopher F. Murphy;Faith M. Gunning-Dixon;Vassilios Latoussakis

  • MRI study of white matter diffusion anisotropy in schizophrenia.

    Babak A. Ardekani;CA Jay Nierenberg;Matthew J. Hoptman;Daniel C. Javitt

  • Quantitative comparison of algorithms for inter-subject registration of 3D volumetric brain MRI scans

    Babak A. Ardekani;Stephen Guckemus;Alvin Bachman;Matthew J. Hoptman;Matthew J. Hoptman

  • Sex differences in brain activation pattern during a visuospatial cognitive task: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy volunteers.

    E. Weiss;C.M. Siedentopf;A. Hofer;E.A. Deisenhammer

  • Frontal white matter microstructure, aggression, and impulsivity in men with schizophrenia: a preliminary study.

    Matthew J Hoptman;Matthew J Hoptman;Jan Volavka;Jan Volavka;Glyn Johnson;Elisabeth Weiss

  • How and why do the two cerebral hemispheres interact

    Matthew J. Hoptman;Richard J. Davidson

  • The Neural Substrates of Impaired Prosodic Detection in Schizophrenia and Its Sensorial Antecedents

    David I. Leitman;Matthew J. Hoptman;John J. Foxe;Erica Saccente

  • Amygdalofrontal Functional Disconnectivity and Aggression in Schizophrenia

    Matthew J. Hoptman;Matthew J. Hoptman;Debra D'Angelo;Dean Catalano;Cristina J. Mauro

  • Cortical thinning, functional connectivity, and mood-related impulsivity in schizophrenia: relationship to aggressive attitudes and behavior.

    Matthew J. Hoptman;Daniel Antonius;Cristina J. Mauro;Emily M. Parker

  • Brain activation pattern during a verbal fluency test in healthy male and female volunteers: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    E.M. Weiss;C. Siedentopf;A. Hofer;E.A. Deisenhammer

  • A DTI study of white matter microstructure in individuals at high genetic risk for schizophrenia.

    Matthew J. Hoptman;Jay Nierenberg;Hilary C. Bertisch;Dean Catalano

  • White-matter integrity predicts stroop performance in patients with geriatric depression.

    Christopher F. Murphy;Faith M. Gunning-Dixon;Matthew J. Hoptman;Kelvin O. Lim

  • Brain morphometry using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: application to schizophrenia.

    Babak A. Ardekani;Arthika Bappal;Debra D'Angelo;Manzar Ashtari

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel C. Javitt
Daniel C. Javitt Columbia University
George S. Alexopoulos
George S. Alexopoulos Cornell University
Pamela D. Butler
Pamela D. Butler Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Kelvin O. Lim
Kelvin O. Lim University of Minnesota
Jan Volavka
Jan Volavka New York University
Robert M. Bilder
Robert M. Bilder University of California, Los Angeles
Michael P. Milham
Michael P. Milham Child Mind Institute
John J. Foxe
John J. Foxe University of Rochester
Leslie Citrome
Leslie Citrome New York Medical College
Alastair J. Flint
Alastair J. Flint University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience can open doors to a range of fulfilling career pathways in healthcare, research, education, and beyond. Many related disciplines, such as psychology and social work, now offer flexible online degree options, allowing students to advance their education while balancing work or family commitments.

If you’re interested in mental health, consider exploring online cheapest online master's in social work programs, which can provide an affordable entry point to clinical or community roles. Fast-track your qualifications with a 1 year online master's in social work if you aim to launch your career quickly.

For those aspiring to specialize in behavioral analysis, accredited bcba accredited programs online offer streamlined options to pursue certification as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. Meanwhile, a psychology degree online is a flexible option for understanding behavior, cognition, and mental processes—core areas relevant to neuroscience.

These online degrees can build complementary skills and knowledge, empowering students to transition into diverse roles or continue advanced study within the field of neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew J. Hoptman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles