World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 112 5188 4868 2804 2598 436 40391

Kelvin O. Lim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kelvin O. Lim between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kelvin O. Lim published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2025. 46 of the 562 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2025. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 21 publications 1997: 20 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 44 publications 2026: 2 publications
1988 2026

562 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kelvin O. Lim: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 4
1990 3
1991 2
1992 3
1993 5
1994 7
1995 13
1996 21
1997 20
1998 5
1999 7
2000 10
2001 4
2002 7
2003 12
2004 2
2005 11
2006 8
2007 11
2008 13
2009 23
2010 13
2011 14
2012 19
2013 18
2014 26
2015 21
2016 21
2017 25
2018 25
2019 18
2020 24
2021 23
2022 29
2023 30
2024 17
2025 44
2026 2
Total 562
Download as CSV

Kelvin O. Lim publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kelvin O. Lim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 436 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 436
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Kelvin O. Lim D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kelvin O. Lim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 112–113 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399 112
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kelvin O. Lim is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their research spans various subfields including cognitive neuroscience, neurology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, clinical psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work covers a broad range of topics, with primary focus areas including functional brain connectivity studies, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, mental health research topics, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, neural dynamics and brain function, advanced MRI techniques and applications, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Significant recent publications by Kelvin O. Lim include:

  • A randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled study of efficacy, safety, and durability of repeated vs single subanesthetic ketamine for treatment-resistant depression (2020, Translational Psychiatry)
  • Emerging ethical issues raised by highly portable MRI research in remote and resource-limited international settings (2021, NeuroImage)
  • Identifying response and predictive biomarkers for Transcranial magnetic stimulation outcomes: protocol and rationale for a mechanistic study of functional neuroimaging and behavioral biomarkers in veterans with Pharmacoresistant depression (2021, BMC Psychiatry)
  • Validation of ketamine as a pharmacological model of thalamic dysconnectivity across the illness course of schizophrenia (2022, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) elicits stimulus-specific enhancement of cortical plasticity (2020, NeuroImage)

Frequent co-authors working alongside Kelvin O. Lim include Bryon A. Mueller, Vince D. Calhoun, Daniel H. Mathalon, Adrian Preda, and Jazmin Camchong.

Lim has published in several notable venues with the highest number of publications appearing in Biological Psychiatry, followed by bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Brain Stimulation, UNC Libraries, and NeuroImage.

Best Publications

  • A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in brain morphology from infancy to late adulthood.

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Daniel H. Mathalon;Edith V. Sullivan;Jody M. Rawles

  • The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex

    Katrina L. Grasby;Neda Jahanshad;Jodie N. Painter;Lucía Colodro-Conde

  • Age-related decline in brain white matter anisotropy measured with spatially corrected echo-planar diffusion tensor imaging.

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Edith V. Sullivan;Maj Hedehus;Kelvin O. Lim

  • Widespread white matter microstructural differences in schizophrenia across 4322 individuals : results from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia DTI Working Group

    S. Kelly;S. Kelly;N. Jahanshad;A. Zalesky;P. Kochunov

  • Brain Gray and White Matter Volume Loss Accelerates with Aging in Chronic Alcoholics: A Quantitative MRI Study

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim;Robert B. Zipursky;Robert B. Zipursky;Daniel H. Mathalon;Daniel H. Mathalon

  • Frontal Lobe Volume Loss Observed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Older Chronic Alcoholics

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Edith V. Sullivan;Edith V. Sullivan;Daniel H. Mathalon;Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim

  • Compromised white matter tract integrity in schizophrenia inferred from diffusion tensor imaging.

    Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim;Maj Hedehus;Michael Moseley;Alexander de Crespigny

  • Widespread cerebral gray matter volume deficits in schizophrenia.

    Robert B. Zipursky;Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim;Edith V. Sullivan;Edith V. Sullivan;Byron W. Brown

  • Longitudinal Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Volumes in Abstinent and Relapsed Alcoholics

    A. Pfefferbaum;E. V. Sullivan;E. V. Sullivan;D. H. Mathalon;P. K. Shear

  • Combined event-related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal-parietal cortex activation during target detection

    V Menon;J M Ford;K O Lim;G H Glover

  • Altered Resting State Complexity in Schizophrenia

    Danielle S. Bassett;Brent G. Nelson;Bryon A. Mueller;Jazmin Camchong

  • Early-stage visual processing and cortical amplification deficits in schizophrenia.

    Pamela D. Butler;Pamela D. Butler;Vance Zemon;Isaac Schechter;Alice M. Saperstein

  • Functional Connectivity in the Cognitive Control Network and the Default Mode Network in Late-life Depression

    George S. Alexopoulos;Matthew J. Hoptman;Matthew J. Hoptman;Dora Kanellopoulos;Christopher F. Murphy

  • Equivalent disruption of regional white matter microstructure in ageing healthy men and women.

    Edith V. Sullivan;Elfar Adalsteinsson;Maj Hedehus;Catherine Ju

  • Segmentation of MR brain images into cerebrospinal fluid spaces, white and gray matter.

    Kelvin O. Lim;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum

  • Altered Functional and Anatomical Connectivity in Schizophrenia

    Jazmin Camchong;Angus W. MacDonald;Christopher Bell;Bryon A. Mueller

  • Anterior hippocampal volume deficits in nonamnesic, aging chronic alcoholics.

    Edith V. Sullivan;Laura Marsh;Laura Marsh;Daniel H. Mathalon;Daniel H. Mathalon;Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim

  • Visual inspection of independent components: Defining a procedure for artifact removal from fMRI data

    Robert E. Kelly;George S. Alexopoulos;Zhishun Wang;Faith M. Gunning

  • In vivo spectroscopic quantification of the N-acetyl moiety, creatine, and choline from large volumes of brain gray and white matter: effects of normal aging.

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Elfar Adalsteinsson;Daniel Spielman;Edith V. Sullivan

  • Frontal white matter microstructure and treatment response of late-life depression: a preliminary study.

    George S. Alexopoulos;Dimitris N. Kiosses;Steven J. Choi;Christopher F. Murphy

Frequent Co-Authors

Adolf Pfefferbaum
Adolf Pfefferbaum Stanford University
Bryon A. Mueller
Bryon A. Mueller University of Minnesota
Edith V. Sullivan
Edith V. Sullivan Stanford University
Daniel H. Mathalon
Daniel H. Mathalon University of California, San Francisco
Vince D. Calhoun
Vince D. Calhoun Georgia State University
Matthew J. Hoptman
Matthew J. Hoptman Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Jessica A. Turner
Jessica A. Turner The Ohio State University
Bonnie Klimes-Dougan
Bonnie Klimes-Dougan University of Minnesota
Aysenil Belger
Aysenil Belger University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Ryan L. Muetzel
Ryan L. Muetzel Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering alternative pathways in healthcare or want to expand your medical career options, several online degree routes may suit your needs. Many aspiring nurses are looking for what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online to help them advance their credentials without incurring high debt.

For individuals who hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree but wish to enter the nursing field, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online offer a fast-track route to a nursing qualification. These flexible options can open doors to advanced practice, leadership, or specialized roles.

Admission can be competitive, but some seek easy nursing schools to get into for a smoother entry into the nursing workforce. Such programs often have more accessible prerequisites and rolling admissions.

Not all medical careers require direct patient care—administrative roles such as medical billing and coding are also in demand. There are plenty of online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, making it possible to access financial aid as you prepare for a career in healthcare administration.

Best Scientists Citing Kelvin O. Lim

Trending Scientists