World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 108 102 97 35 32 306 62319

Kenneth G. Cassman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kenneth G. Cassman between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kenneth G. Cassman published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2011. 4 of the 325 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2011. 1972: 2 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1972 2025

325 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kenneth G. Cassman: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 2
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 3
1978 1
1979 0
1980 3
1981 6
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 5
1990 8
1991 2
1992 16
1993 7
1994 6
1995 10
1996 12
1997 5
1998 7
1999 6
2000 3
2001 5
2002 10
2003 9
2004 10
2005 9
2006 7
2007 6
2008 10
2009 10
2010 9
2011 23
2012 11
2013 16
2014 10
2015 16
2016 13
2017 10
2018 7
2019 7
2020 4
2021 10
2022 3
2023 4
2024 1
2025 3
Total 325
Download as CSV

Kenneth G. Cassman publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth G. Cassman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 306–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 306 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30 306
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Kenneth G. Cassman D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth G. Cassman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8 108
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in United States Leader Award
  • 2017 - The Bertebos Prize, Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry For his crucial importance for the development of the concept ecological intensification of agricultural production, which leads to minimizing the gap between potential and actual return. His extensive scientific production has great importance for applications in agriculture.
  • 2012 - CSSA Presidential Award, American Society of Agronomy
  • 2006 - Carl Sprengel Agronomic Research Award, American Society of Agronomy
  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1999 - Fellow of the Crop Science Society of America (CSSA)
  • 1997 - Fellow of the Soil Science Society of America (SSSA)
  • 1996 - Fellow of the American Society of Agronomy (ASA)

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Agronomy

His scientific interests lie mostly in Agronomy, Yield, Agriculture, Crop yield and Food security. His research links Soil management with Agronomy. His Yield research also works with subjects such as

  • Cropping that connect with fields like Irrigation and Dry season,
  • Environmental quality that connect with fields like Agroecosystem, Developing country and Biogeochemistry.

His Agriculture study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Agroforestry. His Crop yield study deals with Agricultural engineering intersecting with Current yield and Cropping system. His work deals with themes such as Sustainability and Sustainability organizations, which intersect with Intensive farming.

His most cited work include:

  • Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices (4720 citations)
  • Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming (1538 citations)
  • Agroecosystems, Nitrogen-use Efficiency, and Nitrogen Management (1118 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Kenneth G. Cassman mainly focuses on Agronomy, Agriculture, Yield, Agroforestry and Yield gap. Kenneth G. Cassman works mostly in the field of Agronomy, limiting it down to concerns involving Soil water and, occasionally, Mineralogy. His Agriculture study combines topics in areas such as Natural resource economics, Sustainability and Natural resource management.

Kenneth G. Cassman combines subjects such as Cropping, Agricultural engineering and Agricultural economics with his study of Yield. His Crop research incorporates themes from Transplanting and Yield. The Crop yield study combines topics in areas such as Climate change and Sowing.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (45.74%)
  • Agriculture (19.77%)
  • Yield (17.44%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Yield gap (15.89%)
  • Agronomy (45.74%)
  • Agriculture (19.77%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Kenneth G. Cassman mostly deals with Yield gap, Agronomy, Agriculture, Yield and Crop yield. Kenneth G. Cassman has researched Yield gap in several fields, including Crop simulation model, Agricultural engineering, Agricultural productivity and Food security. His work in the fields of Crop, Sowing and Fertilizer overlaps with other areas such as Yield.

His studies deal with areas such as Agroforestry, Sustainability, Agricultural economics and Environmental planning as well as Agriculture. His Yield research incorporates themes from Statistics, Self-sufficiency and Irrigation. His studies in Crop yield integrate themes in fields like Climate change, Soil water and Cropping system.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature (673 citations)
  • Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation (389 citations)
  • Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself? (280 citations)

Best Publications

  • Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices

    David Tilman;Kenneth G. Cassman;Pamela A. Matson;Pamela A. Matson;Rosamond L. Naylor

  • Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming

    Shaobing Peng;Jianliang Huang;John E. Sheehy;Rebecca C. Laza

  • Agroecosystems, Nitrogen-use Efficiency, and Nitrogen Management

    Kenneth G Cassman;Achim R. Dobermann;Daniel T Walters

  • Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture

    Kenneth G. Cassman

  • Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes.

    David B. Lobell;Kenneth G. Cassman;Christopher B. Field

  • Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review

    Martin K. van Ittersum;Kenneth G. Cassman;Patricio Grassini;Joost Wolf

  • Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature

    William F. Laurance;Jeffrey Sayer;Kenneth G. Cassman

  • Nitrogen uptake, fixation and response to fertilizer N in soybeans: A review

    F. Salvagiotti;Kenneth G. Cassman;James E. Specht;Daniel T. Walters

  • Meeting Cereal Demand While Protecting Natural Resources and Improving Environmental Quality

    Kenneth G Cassman;Achim R. Dobermann;Daniel T. Walters;Haishun Yang

  • Towards an ecological understanding of biological nitrogen fixation

    Peter M. Vitousek;Ken Cassman;Cory Cleveland;Tim Crews

  • Post–Green Revolution Trends in Yield Potential of Temperate Maize in the North-Central United States

    D. N. Duvick;Kenneth G. Cassman

  • Yield Potential Trends of Tropical Rice since the Release of IR8 and the Challenge of Increasing Rice Yield Potential

    S. Peng;Kenneth G. Cassman;S. S. Virmani;J. Sheehy

  • Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation

    David S. Powlson;Clare M. Stirling;M. L. Jat;Bruno G. Gerard

  • Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself?

    Martin K. Van Ittersum;Lenny G.J. Van Bussel;Joost Wolf;Patricio Grassini

  • Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends

    Patricio Grassini;Kent M. Eskridge;Kenneth G. Cassman

  • New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China

    Wei-feng Zhang;Zheng-xia Dou;Pan He;Xiao-Tang Ju

  • Integrated soil-crop system management for food security

    Xin-Ping Chen;Zhen-Ling Cui;Peter M. Vitousek;Kenneth G. Cassman

  • Opportunities for increased nitrogen-use efficiency from improved resource management in irrigated rice systems

    Kenneth Cassman;S. Peng;D.C. Olk;J.K. Ladha

  • INCREASED N-USE EFFICIENCY USING A CHLOROPHYLL METER ON HIGH-YIELDING IRRIGATED RICE

    S. Peng;F.V. Garcia;R.C. Laza;A.L. Sanico

  • Annual carbon dioxide exchange in irrigated and rainfed maize-based agroecosystems

    Shashi B. Verma;Achim Dobermann;Kenneth G. Cassman;Daniel T. Walters

  • Agroecosystems, Nitrogen-use Effic iency, and Nitrogen Management

    Kenneth G. Cassman;Achim R. Dobermann;Daniel T. Walters

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricio Grassini
Patricio Grassini University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Haishun Yang
Haishun Yang University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Achim Dobermann
Achim Dobermann International Fertilizer Association
Lieven Claessens
Lieven Claessens Wageningen University & Research
Daniel T. Walters
Daniel T. Walters University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Joost Wolf
Joost Wolf Wageningen University & Research
David J. Connor
David J. Connor University of Melbourne
Shaobing Peng
Shaobing Peng Huazhong Agricultural University
James E. Specht
James E. Specht University of Nebraska–Lincoln
M.K. van Ittersum
M.K. van Ittersum Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth G. Cassman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles