World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 75 1256 1190 38 36 373 24967

M.K. van Ittersum publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by M.K. van Ittersum between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M.K. van Ittersum published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 15.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2009. 36 of the 545 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2009. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 38 publications 2010: 31 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 12 publications
1990 2025

545 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
M.K. van Ittersum: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 8
1993 5
1994 1
1995 4
1996 8
1997 8
1998 9
1999 5
2000 12
2001 11
2002 8
2003 10
2004 13
2005 10
2006 14
2007 20
2008 12
2009 38
2010 31
2011 17
2012 23
2013 21
2014 29
2015 25
2016 14
2017 24
2018 31
2019 22
2020 25
2021 19
2022 13
2023 18
2024 24
2025 12
Total 545
Download as CSV

M.K. van Ittersum publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.K. van Ittersum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 371–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 373 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52 373
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

M.K. van Ittersum D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.K. van Ittersum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67 75
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

M.K. van Ittersum is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands. Their research focuses on agricultural and biological sciences, with significant work in environmental science. The scientist has contributed extensively to various subfields including plant science, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, soil science, and food science.

The main topics addressed in their research encompass climate change impacts on agriculture, agriculture sustainability and environmental impact, crop yield and soil fertility, potato plant research, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, rice cultivation and yield improvement, and food waste reduction and sustainability.

Van Ittersum has published numerous papers in reputable academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include Agricultural Systems, Field Crops Research, Nature Food, European Journal of Agronomy, and Global Food Security.

Notable recent papers include:

  • The future of farming: Who will produce our food? (2021), Food Security
  • Principles, drivers and opportunities of a circular bioeconomy (2021), Nature Food
  • Circularity in Europe strengthens the sustainability of the global food system (2023), Nature Food
  • Circularity in animal production requires a change in the EAT-Lancet diet in Europe (2022), Nature Food
  • Reducing the maize yield gap in Ethiopia: Decomposition and policy simulation (2020), Agricultural Systems

The scientist collaborates frequently with a group of co-authors, including Pytrik Reidsma, Renske Hijbeek, Marloes P. van Loon, João Vasco Silva, and I.J.M. de Boer. These collaborations have contributed to a robust body of work advancing understanding in their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review

    Martin K. van Ittersum;Kenneth G. Cassman;Patricio Grassini;Joost Wolf

  • The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture

    Tomek de Ponti;Bert Rijk;Martin K. van Ittersum

  • Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself?

    Martin K. Van Ittersum;Lenny G.J. Van Bussel;Joost Wolf;Patricio Grassini

  • Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input-output combinations

    M.K. van Ittersum;R. Rabbinge

  • ON APPROACHES AND APPLICATIONS OF THE WAGENINGEN CROP MODELS

    M.K van Ittersum;P.A Leffelaar;H van Keulen;M.J Kropff

  • Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework

    Henk Renting;W.A.H Rossing;J.C.J Groot;J.D. van der Ploeg

  • Integrated assessment of agricultural systems: a component - based framework for the European Union (Seamless)

    Martin K. van Ittersum;Frank Ewert;Thomas Heckelei;Jacques Wery

  • Residual soil phosphorus as the missing piece in the global phosphorus crisis puzzle

    Sheida Z. Sattari;Alexander F. Bouwman;Ken E. Giller;Martin K. van Ittersum

  • Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models

    Sander Janssen;Martin K. van Ittersum

  • The future of farming: Who will produce our food?

    Ken E. Giller;Thomas Delaune;João Vasco Silva;João Vasco Silva;Katrien Descheemaeker

  • How good is good enough? Data requirements for reliable crop yield simulations and yield-gap analysis

    Patricio Grassini;Lenny G.J. van Bussel;Justin Van Wart;Joost Wolf

  • Use of agro-climatic zones to upscale simulated crop yield potential

    Justin van Wart;Lenny G.J. van Bussel;Joost Wolf;Rachel Licker

  • Resource use efficiency and environmental performance of nine major biofuel crops, processed by first-generation conversion techniques

    Sander C. de Vries;Gerrie W.J. van de Ven;Martin K. van Ittersum;Ken E. Giller

  • Principles, drivers and opportunities of a circular bioeconomy

    Abigail Muscat;Evelien M. de Olde;Raimon Ripoll-Bosch;Hannah H. E. Van Zanten

  • Crop modelling for integrated assessment of risk to food production from climate change

    F. Ewert;R.P. Rötter;M. Bindi;H. Webber

  • Sustainable development goal 2: Improved targets and indicators for agriculture and food security

    Juliana Dias Bernardes Gil;Pytrik Reidsma;Ken Giller;Lindsay Todman

  • The role of farm animals in a circular food system

    Hannah H.E. Van Zanten;Martin K. Van Ittersum;Imke J.M. De Boer

  • ROTAT, a tool for systematically generating crop rotations

    S Dogliotti;W.A.H Rossing;M.K van Ittersum

  • Exploring multi-scale trade-offs between nature conservation, agricultural profits and landscape quality—A methodology to support discussions on land-use perspectives

    Jeroen C.J. Groot;Walter A.H. Rossing;André Jellema;Derk Jan Stobbelaar

  • Rice yields and yield gaps in Southeast Asia: Past trends and future outlook

    Alice G. Laborte;Alice G. Laborte;Kees (C.A.J.M.) de Bie;Eric M.A. Smaling;Piedad F. Moya

  • Competing Claims on Natural Resources: What Role for Science?

    Ken E. Giller;Cees Leeuwis;Jens A. Andersson;Wim Andriesse

  • Scale changes and model linking methods for integrated assessment of agri-environmental systems

    Frank Ewert;Frank Ewert;Martin K. van Ittersum;Thomas Heckelei;Olivier Therond

Frequent Co-Authors

Joost Wolf
Joost Wolf Wageningen University & Research
H. van Keulen
H. van Keulen Wageningen University & Research
Patricio Grassini
Patricio Grassini University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Kenneth G. Cassman
Kenneth G. Cassman University of Nebraska–Lincoln
I.J.M. de Boer
I.J.M. de Boer Wageningen University & Research
Lieven Claessens
Lieven Claessens Wageningen University & Research
Thomas Heckelei
Thomas Heckelei University of Bonn
Jacques Wery
Jacques Wery Institut Agro, France
Ken E. Giller
Ken E. Giller Wageningen University & Research
Frank Ewert
Frank Ewert University of Bonn

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which benefit from complementary online degrees. For those interested in public administration and policy implementation, exploring 1 year mpa programs can provide essential skills in management and leadership within environmental agencies.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is another critical aspect, making online sociology bachelor programs a valuable option. These programs help deepen insights into human-environment interactions and foster community-focused solutions.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise, pursuing a doctorate can be ideal. Many prefer flexible options like doctoral programs online no dissertation, which emphasize practical research over traditional dissertation requirements.

Additionally, those focused on education and leadership can benefit from exploring top-tier online eds to edd programs. These programs are designed to enhance educational strategies and policy development relevant to environmental learning and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing M.K. van Ittersum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles