World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
64
Citations
18856
World Ranking
964
National Ranking
77

Claas Nendel publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claas Nendel sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 290 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Claas Nendel D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claas Nendel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claas Nendel is affiliated with the University of Potsdam in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science.

Their research spans several subfields, including Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Agronomy and Crop Science, and Ecology.

Key topics addressed in Nendel's work comprise:

  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Claas Nendel has authored several notable papers including:

  • Mapping of crop types and crop sequences with combined time series of Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 data for Germany (2021, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Mapping grassland mowing events across Germany based on combined Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 time series (2021, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Ten deep learning techniques to address small data problems with remote sensing (2023, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation)
  • Modelling climate change impacts on maize yields under low nitrogen input conditions in sub-Saharan Africa (2020, Global Change Biology)
  • No perfect storm for crop yield failure in Germany (2020, Environmental Research Letters)

Nendel frequently collaborates with other researchers. Regular co-authors include Kurt Christian Kersebaum, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Roberto Ferrise, Frank Ewert, and Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei.

Their work is often published in journals and platforms such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), SSRN Electronic Journal, European Journal of Agronomy, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, and Open Data Journal for Agricultural Research.

Best Publications

  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;P. Martre;P. Martre;R. P. Rötter

  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;C. Rosenzweig;J. W. Jones

  • How Do Various Maize Crop Models Vary in Their Responses to Climate Change Factors

    Simona Bassu;Nadine Brisson;Jean Louis Durand;Kenneth Boote

  • Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods

    Bing Liu;Bing Liu;Senthold Asseng;Christoph Müller;Frank Ewert

  • Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one

    Pierre Martre;Pierre Martre;Daniel Wallach;Senthold Asseng;Frank Ewert

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein

    Senthold Asseng;Pierre Martre;Andrea Maiorano;Reimund P Rötter

  • Intra-annual reflectance composites from Sentinel-2 and Landsat for national-scale crop and land cover mapping

    Patrick Griffiths;Patrick Griffiths;Claas Nendel;Patrick Hostert

  • Diverging importance of drought stress for maize and winter wheat in Europe

    Heidi Webber;Frank Ewert;Jørgen E. Olesen;Christoph Müller

  • Simulation of spring barley yield in different climatic zones of Northern and Central Europe: A comparison of nine crop models

    Reimund P. Rötter;Taru Palosuo;Kurt Christian Kersebaum;Carlos Angulo

  • Crop modelling for integrated assessment of risk to food production from climate change

    F. Ewert;R.P. Rötter;M. Bindi;H. Webber

  • The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions.

    Enli Wang;Pierre Martre;Zhigan Zhao;Zhigan Zhao;Frank Ewert

  • The MONICA model: Testing predictability for crop growth, soil moisture and nitrogen dynamics

    C. Nendel;M. Berg;K.C. Kersebaum;W. Mirschel

  • The soybean yield gap in Brazil – magnitude, causes and possible solutions for sustainable production

    P. C. Sentelhas;R. Battisti;G. M. S. Câmara;J. R. B. Farias

  • LandscapeDNDC: a process model for simulation of biosphere–atmosphere–hydrosphere exchange processes at site and regional scale

    Edwin Haas;Steffen Klatt;Alexander Fröhlich;Philipp Kraft

  • Decline in climate resilience of European wheat.

    Helena Kahiluoto;Janne Kaseva;Jan Balek;Jørgen E. Olesen

  • Contribution of crop model structure, parameters and climate projections to uncertainty in climate change impact assessments.

    Fulu Tao;Reimund P. Rötter;Taru Palosuo;Carlos Gregorio Hernández Díaz‐Ambrona

  • Agricultural land use changes – a scenario-based sustainability impact assessment for Brandenburg, Germany

    C. Gutzler;K. Helming;D. Balla;R. Dannowski

  • Crop rotation modelling—A European model intercomparison

    Chris Kollas;Kurt Christian Kersebaum;Claas Nendel;Kiril Manevski

  • Impact of spatial soil and climate input data aggregation on regional yield simulations

    Holger Hoffmann;Gang Zhao;Senthold Asseng;Marco Bindi

  • A global inventory of N2O emissions from tropical rainforest soils using a detailed biogeochemical model

    C. Werner;K. Butterbach-Bahl;E. Haas;Thomas Hickler

  • Analysis and classification of data sets for calibration and validation of agro-ecosystem models

    K.C. Kersebaum;K.J. Boote;J.S. Jorgenson;C. Nendel

  • Global wheat production with 1.5 and 2.0°C above pre-industrial warming

    Bing Liu;Pierre Martre;Frank Ewert;John R. Porter;John R. Porter;John R. Porter

  • Predicting maize phenology: intercomparison of functions for developmental response to temperature

    S. Kumudini;Fernando Hector Andrade;K.J. Boote;G.A. Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt Christian Kersebaum
Kurt Christian Kersebaum Czech Academy of Sciences
Frank Ewert
Frank Ewert University of Bonn
Reimund P. Rötter
Reimund P. Rötter University of Göttingen
Thomas Gaiser
Thomas Gaiser University of Bonn
Fulu Tao
Fulu Tao Chinese Academy of Sciences
Bruno Basso
Bruno Basso Michigan State University
Zhigan Zhao
Zhigan Zhao Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Davide Cammarano
Davide Cammarano Aarhus University
Marco Bindi
Marco Bindi University of Florence
Taru Palosuo
Taru Palosuo Natural Resources Institute Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Claas Nendel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles