World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 98 177 168 61 57 635 43395

Gerrit Hoogenboom publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gerrit Hoogenboom between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gerrit Hoogenboom published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 20.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 62 publications in 2024. 48 of the 826 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 62. Peak 62 publications in 2024. 1986: 5 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 35 publications 2009: 40 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 38 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 43 publications 2022: 46 publications 2023: 43 publications 2024: 62 publications 2025: 46 publications 2026: 2 publications
1986 2026

826 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gerrit Hoogenboom: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 5
1987 6
1988 5
1989 3
1990 4
1991 5
1992 2
1993 5
1994 14
1995 3
1996 5
1997 6
1998 7
1999 7
2000 19
2001 11
2002 12
2003 20
2004 15
2005 22
2006 14
2007 28
2008 35
2009 40
2010 22
2011 20
2012 21
2013 23
2014 16
2015 34
2016 18
2017 30
2018 38
2019 33
2020 36
2021 43
2022 46
2023 43
2024 62
2025 46
2026 2
Total 826
Download as CSV

Gerrit Hoogenboom publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerrit Hoogenboom sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 467+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 635 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99 635
Download as CSV

Gerrit Hoogenboom D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerrit Hoogenboom sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11 98
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in United States Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Statistics

Gerrit Hoogenboom focuses on Agronomy, DSSAT, Crop yield, Crop simulation model and Climate change. His research on Agronomy often connects related topics like Soil water. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Soil texture, Water balance, Cropping system and Sowing.

Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Growing season and Crop yield. His work in Crop simulation model covers topics such as Statistics which are related to areas like Gene–environment interaction. His Climate change research includes elements of Agriculture, Precipitation and Yield.

His most cited work include:

  • The DSSAT cropping system model (2348 citations)
  • Decision support system for agrotechnology transfer: DSSAT v3 (832 citations)
  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production (801 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Gerrit Hoogenboom spends much of his time researching Agronomy, DSSAT, Irrigation, Crop and Crop simulation model. His Agronomy study is mostly concerned with Sowing, Cultivar, Cropping system, Crop yield and Phenology. As part of his studies on DSSAT, Gerrit Hoogenboom often connects relevant areas like Decision support system.

His Irrigation research incorporates themes from Water use, Soil water and Water content. His studies in Crop integrate themes in fields like Yield and Growing season. In his study, Gerrit Hoogenboom carries out multidisciplinary Crop simulation model and Simulation modeling research.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (46.90%)
  • DSSAT (20.18%)
  • Irrigation (19.12%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Agronomy (46.90%)
  • Climate change (15.93%)
  • DSSAT (20.18%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Agronomy, Climate change, DSSAT, Agriculture and Crop. All of his Agronomy and Sowing, Cultivar, Irrigation, Phenology and Leaf area index investigations are sub-components of the entire Agronomy study. His Irrigation study which covers Growing season that intersects with Dry weight.

His research in Climate change intersects with topics in Arid, Agricultural productivity, Food security and Yield. His Yield research includes elements of Representative Concentration Pathways and Crop yield. Gerrit Hoogenboom has included themes like Agricultural engineering, Cropping system, Decision support system and Greenhouse gas in his DSSAT study.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein (97 citations)
  • The DSSAT crop modeling ecosystem (54 citations)
  • Global wheat production with 1.5 and 2.0°C above pre-industrial warming (40 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Statistics

Gerrit Hoogenboom mainly focuses on Agronomy, Climate change, Sowing, Crop and DSSAT. Gerrit Hoogenboom regularly ties together related areas like Co2 concentration in his Agronomy studies. Gerrit Hoogenboom has researched Climate change in several fields, including Transplanting, Growing degree-day, Yield, Arid and Food security.

Gerrit Hoogenboom combines subjects such as Biomass, Soil water, Yield, Tropical savanna climate and Anthesis with his study of Sowing. The concepts of his Crop study are interwoven with issues in Cultivar and Phenology. Gerrit Hoogenboom interconnects Cropping system, Agricultural engineering and Decision support system in the investigation of issues within DSSAT.

Best Publications

  • The DSSAT cropping system model

    J.W Jones;G Hoogenboom;C.H Porter;K.J Boote

  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;P. Martre;P. Martre;R. P. Rötter

  • Climate impacts on global agriculture emerge earlier in new generation of climate and crop models

    Jonas Jägermeyr;Jonas Jägermeyr;Jonas Jägermeyr;Christoph Müller;Alex C. Ruane;Joshua Elliott

  • Contribution of agrometeorology to the simulation of crop production and its applications

    Gerrit Hoogenboom

  • Methodologies for simulating impacts of climate change on crop production

    Jeffrey W. White;Gerrit Hoogenboom;Bruce A. Kimball;Gerard W. Wall

  • Understanding options for agricultural production.

    Gordon Y. Tsuji;Gerrit Hoogenboom;Philip K. Thornton

  • Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) Version 4.5 [CD-ROM]

    G. Hoogenboom;J. E. Jones;P. W. Wilkens;C. Q. Porter

  • Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods

    Bing Liu;Bing Liu;Senthold Asseng;Christoph Müller;Frank Ewert

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein

    Senthold Asseng;Pierre Martre;Andrea Maiorano;Reimund P Rötter

  • Simulation of crop growth: CROPGRO model

    Kenneth J. Boote;James W. Jones;Gerrit Hoogenboom

  • The CROPGRO model for grain legumes

    K. J. Boote;J. W. Jones;G. Hoogenboom;N. B. Pickering

  • The impact of climate variability and change on crop yield in Bulgaria

    V.A Alexandrov;G Hoogenboom

  • The DSSAT crop modeling ecosystem

    Gerrit Hoogenboom;Cheryl H. Porter;Kenneth J. Boote

  • DSSAT cropping system model

    J.W. Jones;G. Hoogenboom;C.H. Porter;K.J. Boote

  • Nitrate leaching in a silage maize field under different irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer rates

    Mahdi Gheysari;Seyed Majid Mirlatifi;Mehdi Homaee;Mohammad Esmaeil Asadi

  • Application of the CSM-CERES-Maize model for planting date evaluation and yield forecasting for maize grown off-season in a subtropical environment

    Cecilia Manuela Tojo Soler;Paulo César Sentelhas;Gerrit Hoogenboom

  • Modifying DSSAT Crop Models for Low-Input Agricultural Systems Using a Soil Organic Matter–Residue Module from CENTURY

    Arjan J. Gijsman;Gerrit Hoogenboom;William Julian Parton;Peter C. Kerridge

  • An evaluation of the statistical methods for testing the performance of crop models with observed data

    J.M. Yang;J.Y. Yang;S. Liu;S. Liu;G. Hoogenboom

  • The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions.

    Enli Wang;Pierre Martre;Zhigan Zhao;Zhigan Zhao;Frank Ewert

  • Root growth rate of soybean as affected by drought stress

    Gerrit Hoogenboom;M. G. Huck;Curt M. Peterson

  • GENCALC: Software to Facilitate the Use of Crop Models for Analyzing Field Experiments

    L. A. Hunt;S. Pararajasingham;J. W. Jones;G. Hoogenboom

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth J. Boote
Kenneth J. Boote University of Florida
Jeffrey W. White
Jeffrey W. White University of Florida
James W. Jones
James W. Jones University of Florida
Senthold Asseng
Senthold Asseng Technical University of Munich
Sanun Jogloy
Sanun Jogloy Khon Kaen University
Ashfaq Ahmad
Ashfaq Ahmad University of Agriculture Faisalabad
Mohammad Bannayan
Mohammad Bannayan Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
Peter J. Thorburn
Peter J. Thorburn Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Andrew J. Challinor
Andrew J. Challinor University of Leeds
Shakeel Ahmad
Shakeel Ahmad Bahauddin Zakariya University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Gerrit Hoogenboom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles