World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9012 8417 4778 4348 101 12087

Laura J. Kray publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laura J. Kray between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laura J. Kray published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2022. 1 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2022. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1995 2025

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laura J. Kray: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 4
2002 6
2003 2
2004 5
2005 3
2006 4
2007 5
2008 4
2009 4
2010 7
2011 6
2012 6
2013 3
2014 3
2015 7
2016 1
2017 6
2018 3
2019 3
2020 5
2021 3
2022 8
2023 7
2024 0
2025 1
Total 111
Download as CSV

Laura J. Kray publications per year - data summary

  • Laura J. Kray, a Psychology scholar from University of California, Berkeley, has 111 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1995 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2022, with 8 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1995, 1999, 2000, 2016 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 31 years in the span carry no publications at all (1996, 1997 and 2024).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.0 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 19 publications, 17% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1995-2005: 25 publications (2.3 per year); 2006-2016: 50 publications (4.5 per year); 2017-2025: 36 publications (4.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Laura J. Kray publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura J. Kray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 101
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Laura J. Kray publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Laura J. Kray, a Psychology scholar from University of California, Berkeley, records 101 publications - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Laura J. Kray, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Laura J. Kray ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Laura J. Kray D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura J. Kray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Laura J. Kray D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Laura J. Kray, a Psychology scholar from University of California, Berkeley, records 37 D-Index - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Laura J. Kray, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Laura J. Kray ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Laura J. Kray is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research work primarily falls within the Social Sciences, with a significant focus on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Safety Research, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Social Psychology.

Their scholarly output addresses several key topics, including Social and Intergroup Psychology, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Gender Roles and Identity Studies, Conflict Management and Negotiation, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Climate Change Communication and Perception, and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior.

Laura J. Kray has contributed to multiple publication venues with a range of works distributed as follows:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings (7 publications)
  • Research in Organizational Behavior (4 publications)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (3 publications)
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2 publications)
  • Academy of Management Discoveries (1 publication)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Laura J. Kray include:

  • Now, Women Do Ask: A Call to Update Beliefs about the Gender Pay Gap, 2023, Academy of Management Discoveries
  • Agentic but not warm: Age-gender interactions and the consequences of stereotype incongruity perceptions for middle-aged professional women, 2022, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Research in Organizational Behavior, 2020, Research in Organizational Behavior
  • A gender gap in managerial span of control: Implications for the gender pay gap, 2021, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Gender similarities and differences in dishonesty, 2022, Current Opinion in Psychology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Jennifer A. Chatman
  • Sonya Mishra
  • Jessica A. Kennedy
  • Margaret Lee
  • Charlotte Townsend

Best Publications

  • Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations.

    Laura J. Kray;Leigh Thompson;Adam Galinsky

  • Reversing the Gender Gap in Negotiations: An Exploration of Stereotype Regeneration

    Laura J Kray;Adam D Galinsky;Leigh Thompson

  • The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities

    E.Allan Lind;Laura Kray;Leigh Thompson

  • GENDER STEREOTYPES AND NEGOTIATION PERFORMANCE: AN EXAMINATION OF THEORY AND RESEARCH

    Laura J. Kray;Leigh Thompson

  • Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.

    Anaïs Llorens;Athina Tzovara;Athina Tzovara;Ludovic Bellier;Ilina Bhaya-Grossman

  • Primacy Effects in Justice Judgments: Testing Predictions from Fairness Heuristic Theory.

    E. Allan Lind;Laura Kray;Leigh Thompson

  • The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions

    Laura J Kray;Adam D Galinsky

  • Research in Organizational Behavior

    Jennifer A. Chatman;Laura J. Kray

  • From what might have been to what must have been: counterfactual thinking creates meaning.

    Laura J. Kray;Linda G. George;Katie A. Liljenquist;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Stereotype Reactance at the Bargaining Table: The Effect of Stereotype Activation and Power on Claiming and Creating Value

    Laura J. Kray;Jochen Reb;Adam D. Galinsky;Leigh Thompson

  • Implicit negotiation beliefs and performance: experimental and longitudinal evidence.

    Laura J. Kray;Michael P. Haselhuhn

  • Contingent Weighting in Self-Other Decision Making

    Laura J. Kray

  • Differential weighting in choice versus advice: I’ll do this, you do that

    Laura Kray;Richard Gonzalez

  • Implications of Counterfactual Structure for Creative Generation and Analytical Problem Solving

    Keith D. Markman;Matthew J. Lindberg;Laura J. Kray;Adam D. Galinsky

  • The effects of implicit gender role theories on gender system justification: Fixed beliefs strengthen masculinity to preserve the status quo.

    Laura J. Kray;Laura Howland;Alexandra G. Russell;Lauren M. Jackman

  • Thinking within the box : The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets

    Laura J. Kray;Adam D. Galinsky;Elaine M. Wong

  • Gender differences in trust dynamics: Women trust more than men following a trust violation

    Michael P. Haselhuhn;Jessica A. Kennedy;Laura J. Kray;Alex B. Van Zant

  • From thinking about what might have been to sharing what we know: The effects of counterfactual mind-sets on information sharing in groups

    Adam D Galinsky;Laura J Kray

  • The injustices of others: Social reports and the integration of others' experiences in organizational justice judgments.

    Laura J Kray;E Allan Lind

  • Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice.

    Jochen Reb;Barry M. Goldman;Laura J. Kray;Russell Cropanzano

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam D. Galinsky
Adam D. Galinsky Columbia University
Leigh Thompson
Leigh Thompson Northwestern University
E. Allan Lind
E. Allan Lind Duke University
Jennifer A. Chatman
Jennifer A. Chatman University of California, Berkeley
Maurice E. Schweitzer
Maurice E. Schweitzer University of Pennsylvania
Russell Cropanzano
Russell Cropanzano University of Colorado Boulder
Margaret A. Neale
Margaret A. Neale Stanford University
Nina F. Dronkers
Nina F. Dronkers University of California, Davis
Danielle S. Bassett
Danielle S. Bassett University of Pennsylvania
Carol S. Dweck
Carol S. Dweck Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to psychology in the USA opens doors to specialized knowledge and versatile career options. Many students seek programs that balance academic rigor with affordability, making online study a practical choice for working adults and recent graduates alike.

For those aiming for advanced leadership roles in mental and behavioral health, pursuing the cheapest psyd behavioral health leadership degree can offer a path to senior positions in healthcare systems and community organizations.

If your interests center on supporting individuals and communities with a broad human services approach, there are several affordable online human services programs that prepare graduates for roles in case management, advocacy, and nonprofit management.

Students passionate about the intersection of psychology and the legal system may consider an affordable online master's degree in forensic psychology. This specialization is ideal for careers in criminal justice, corrections, or court systems.

For foundational or specialized study, cheap online master's in psychology programs offer flexibility and value. Graduates are well-prepared for roles in research, education, counseling, or corporate settings.

Best Scientists Citing Laura J. Kray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles