World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
12087
World Ranking
9012
National Ranking
4778

Laura J. Kray publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura J. Kray sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Laura J. Kray D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura J. Kray sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laura J. Kray is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research work primarily falls within the Social Sciences, with a significant focus on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Safety Research, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Social Psychology.

Their scholarly output addresses several key topics, including Social and Intergroup Psychology, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Gender Roles and Identity Studies, Conflict Management and Negotiation, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Climate Change Communication and Perception, and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior.

Laura J. Kray has contributed to multiple publication venues with a range of works distributed as follows:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings (7 publications)
  • Research in Organizational Behavior (4 publications)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (3 publications)
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2 publications)
  • Academy of Management Discoveries (1 publication)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Laura J. Kray include:

  • Now, Women Do Ask: A Call to Update Beliefs about the Gender Pay Gap, 2023, Academy of Management Discoveries
  • Agentic but not warm: Age-gender interactions and the consequences of stereotype incongruity perceptions for middle-aged professional women, 2022, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Research in Organizational Behavior, 2020, Research in Organizational Behavior
  • A gender gap in managerial span of control: Implications for the gender pay gap, 2021, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Gender similarities and differences in dishonesty, 2022, Current Opinion in Psychology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Jennifer A. Chatman
  • Sonya Mishra
  • Jessica A. Kennedy
  • Margaret Lee
  • Charlotte Townsend

Best Publications

  • Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations.

    Laura J. Kray;Leigh Thompson;Adam Galinsky

  • Reversing the Gender Gap in Negotiations: An Exploration of Stereotype Regeneration

    Laura J Kray;Adam D Galinsky;Leigh Thompson

  • The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities

    E.Allan Lind;Laura Kray;Leigh Thompson

  • GENDER STEREOTYPES AND NEGOTIATION PERFORMANCE: AN EXAMINATION OF THEORY AND RESEARCH

    Laura J. Kray;Leigh Thompson

  • Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.

    Anaïs Llorens;Athina Tzovara;Athina Tzovara;Ludovic Bellier;Ilina Bhaya-Grossman

  • Primacy Effects in Justice Judgments: Testing Predictions from Fairness Heuristic Theory.

    E. Allan Lind;Laura Kray;Leigh Thompson

  • The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions

    Laura J Kray;Adam D Galinsky

  • Research in Organizational Behavior

    Jennifer A. Chatman;Laura J. Kray

  • From what might have been to what must have been: counterfactual thinking creates meaning.

    Laura J. Kray;Linda G. George;Katie A. Liljenquist;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Stereotype Reactance at the Bargaining Table: The Effect of Stereotype Activation and Power on Claiming and Creating Value

    Laura J. Kray;Jochen Reb;Adam D. Galinsky;Leigh Thompson

  • Implicit negotiation beliefs and performance: experimental and longitudinal evidence.

    Laura J. Kray;Michael P. Haselhuhn

  • Contingent Weighting in Self-Other Decision Making

    Laura J. Kray

  • Differential weighting in choice versus advice: I’ll do this, you do that

    Laura Kray;Richard Gonzalez

  • Implications of Counterfactual Structure for Creative Generation and Analytical Problem Solving

    Keith D. Markman;Matthew J. Lindberg;Laura J. Kray;Adam D. Galinsky

  • The effects of implicit gender role theories on gender system justification: Fixed beliefs strengthen masculinity to preserve the status quo.

    Laura J. Kray;Laura Howland;Alexandra G. Russell;Lauren M. Jackman

  • Thinking within the box : The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets

    Laura J. Kray;Adam D. Galinsky;Elaine M. Wong

  • Gender differences in trust dynamics: Women trust more than men following a trust violation

    Michael P. Haselhuhn;Jessica A. Kennedy;Laura J. Kray;Alex B. Van Zant

  • From thinking about what might have been to sharing what we know: The effects of counterfactual mind-sets on information sharing in groups

    Adam D Galinsky;Laura J Kray

  • The injustices of others: Social reports and the integration of others' experiences in organizational justice judgments.

    Laura J Kray;E Allan Lind

  • Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice.

    Jochen Reb;Barry M. Goldman;Laura J. Kray;Russell Cropanzano

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam D. Galinsky
Adam D. Galinsky Columbia University
Leigh Thompson
Leigh Thompson Northwestern University
E. Allan Lind
E. Allan Lind Duke University
Jennifer A. Chatman
Jennifer A. Chatman University of California, Berkeley
Maurice E. Schweitzer
Maurice E. Schweitzer University of Pennsylvania
Russell Cropanzano
Russell Cropanzano University of Colorado Boulder
Margaret A. Neale
Margaret A. Neale Stanford University
Nina F. Dronkers
Nina F. Dronkers University of California, Davis
Danielle S. Bassett
Danielle S. Bassett University of Pennsylvania
Carol S. Dweck
Carol S. Dweck Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to psychology in the USA opens doors to specialized knowledge and versatile career options. Many students seek programs that balance academic rigor with affordability, making online study a practical choice for working adults and recent graduates alike.

For those aiming for advanced leadership roles in mental and behavioral health, pursuing the cheapest psyd behavioral health leadership degree can offer a path to senior positions in healthcare systems and community organizations.

If your interests center on supporting individuals and communities with a broad human services approach, there are several affordable online human services programs that prepare graduates for roles in case management, advocacy, and nonprofit management.

Students passionate about the intersection of psychology and the legal system may consider an affordable online master's degree in forensic psychology. This specialization is ideal for careers in criminal justice, corrections, or court systems.

For foundational or specialized study, cheap online master's in psychology programs offer flexibility and value. Graduates are well-prepared for roles in research, education, counseling, or corporate settings.

Best Scientists Citing Laura J. Kray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles