World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
105
Citations
52710
World Ranking
485
National Ranking
23

Naomi Ellemers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi Ellemers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 389 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Naomi Ellemers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi Ellemers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2019 - Aristotle Prize, European Federation of Psychologists' Associations
  • 2011 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2010 - Spinoza Prize, Dutch Research Council

Overview

Naomi Ellemers is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their scholarly contributions span multiple areas within the social sciences, with a particular emphasis on psychology and sociology. Their research output includes 80 publications in social sciences and 35 in psychology, reflecting sustained engagement with topics central to human behavior and social dynamics.

Their work addresses several subfields of study:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Gender Studies
  • Strategy and Management

Key topics in Ellemers' research include:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

Their publications have appeared in a range of academic venues. The most frequent of these are:

  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • Business Ethics and Leadership
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • PLoS ONE
  • British Journal of Social Psychology

Notable recent papers by Ellemers include:

  • "Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response" (2020), Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Navigating the social world: Toward an integrated framework for evaluating self, individuals, and groups." (2020), Psychological Review
  • "Trust predicts COVID-19 prescribed and discretionary behavioral intentions in 23 countries" (2021), PLoS ONE
  • "The Queen Bee phenomenon in Academia 15 years after: Does it still exist, and if so, why?" (2020), British Journal of Social Psychology
  • "A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19" (2023), Nature

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Elianne F. van Steenbergen
  • Belle Derks
  • Félice van Nunspeet
  • Daan Scheepers
  • Jolanda Jetten

Throughout their career, Ellemers has been recognized with several awards such as:

  • Member of Academia Europaea, 2020
  • Aristotle Prize, European Federation of Psychologists' Associations, 2019
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2011
  • Spinoza Prize, Dutch Research Council, 2010

Best Publications

  • Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

    Jay J. Van Bavel;Katherine Baicker;Paulo S. Boggio;Valerio Capraro

  • Self and social identity

    Naomi Ellemers;Russell Spears;Bertjan Doosje

  • Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity

    Naomi Ellemers;Paulien Kortekaas;Jaap W. Ouwerkerk

  • The context and content of social identity threat

    N.R. Branscombe;N. Ellemers;R. Spears;E.J. Doosje

  • PERCEIVED INTRAGROUP VARIABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP STATUS AND IDENTIFICATION

    Bertjan Doosje;Naomi Ellemers;Russell Spears

  • Motivating Individuals and Groups at Work: A Social Identity Perspective on Leadership and Group Performance

    Naomi Ellemers;Dick De Gilder;S. Alexander Haslam

  • Stereotype content model across cultures: towards universal similarities and some differences.

    Amy J. C. Cuddy;Susan T. Fiske;Virginia S. Y. Kwan;Peter Glick

  • Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups.

    Colin Wayne Leach;Naomi Ellemers;Manuela Barreto

  • The Influence of Socio-structural Variables on Identity Management Strategies

    Naomi Ellemers

  • Sticking Together or Falling Apart: In-Group Identification as a Psychological Determinant of Group Commitment Versus Individual Mobility

    Naomi Ellemers;Russell Spears;Bertjan Doosje

  • Gender Stereotypes

    Unknown

  • Self-Stereotyping in the Face of Threats to Group Status and Distinctiveness: The Role of Group Identification

    Russell Spears;Bertjan Doosje;Naomi Ellemers

  • Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies.

    Naomi Ellemers;Henk Wilke;Ad van Knippenberg

  • Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work

    Naomi Ellemers;Dick de Gilder;Henriëtte van den Heuvel

  • The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women

    Belle Derks;Colette Van Laar;Naomi Ellemers

  • SOCIAL IDENTITY IN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS

    S. Alexander Haslam;Naomi Ellemers

  • The burden of benevolent sexism: how it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities

    Manuela Barreto;Naomi Ellemers

  • The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome?

    Naomi Ellemers;Henriette van den Heuvel;Dick de Gilder;Anne Maass

  • Social identification and permeability of group boundaries

    Naomi Ellemers;Ad van Knippenberg;Nanne De Vries;Henk Wilke

  • More than a Metaphor: Organizational Identity Makes Organizational Life Possible

    S. Alexander Haslam;Tom Postmes;Naomi Ellemers

  • Social identity: Context, commitment and content

    Naomi Ellemers;Russell Spears;Bertjan Doosje

  • The social psychology of stereotyping and group life

    R. Spears;P.J. Oakes;N. Ellemers;S.A. Haslam

Frequent Co-Authors

Manuela Barreto
Manuela Barreto University of Exeter
Daan Scheepers
Daan Scheepers Leiden University
Belle Derks
Belle Derks University of Twente
Russell Spears
Russell Spears University of Groningen
S. Alexander Haslam
S. Alexander Haslam University of Queensland
Bertjan Doosje
Bertjan Doosje University of Amsterdam
Kai Sassenberg
Kai Sassenberg Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Michael J. Platow
Michael J. Platow Australian National University
Jolanda Jetten
Jolanda Jetten University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens doors to a diverse range of career paths in the USA, from clinical roles to research, counseling, human resources, and education. Choosing the right program is crucial, especially for those interested in flexible online study options that fit busy schedules.

Many cities and states offer robust choices. For example, students can discover popular psychology programs in Kent, highlighting both campus-based and online learning opportunities. If you’re interested in the Southwest, the popular psychology degrees in Las Vegas reveal strong program options suited for aspiring practitioners or researchers.

The South also offers excellent education pathways, with top-ranked psychology degree programs in Nashville known for academic excellence and student support. Meanwhile, those in the Midwest can benefit from the wide range of popular psychology programs in Oklahoma, many of which provide strong online formats.

As the demand for mental health professionals rises, online psychology degrees are increasingly seen as practical, accessible pathways to fulfilling careers in diverse settings.

Best Scientists Citing Naomi Ellemers

Trending Scientists