World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
5068
World Ranking
10500
National Ranking
461

Daan Scheepers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daan Scheepers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daan Scheepers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daan Scheepers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daan Scheepers is a researcher affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their work primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Applied Psychology. The research is centered around key topics including Social and Intergroup Psychology, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Cultural Differences and Values, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion, Gender Diversity and Inequality, and Flow Experience in Various Fields.

Recent publication venues where Scheepers has frequently published include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Psychophysiology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior

The following recent papers highlight some aspects of Scheepers' research contributions:

  • On the physiology of flow: Bridging flow theory with the biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat, 2022, International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • On the hiring of kin in organizations: Perceived nepotism and its implications for fairness perceptions and the willingness to join an organization, 2020, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Value Alignment and Public Perceived Legitimacy of the European Union and the Court of Justice, 2022, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Assessing the Effects of a Real-Life Contact Intervention on Prejudice Toward LGBT People, 2021, Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Reflecting on Existential Threats Elicits Self-Reported Negative Affect but No Physiological Arousal, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology

Frequent co-authors in Scheepers' work include:

  • Naomi Ellemers (6 collaborations)
  • Eva Grosfeld (5 collaborations)
  • Armin Cuyvers (5 collaborations)
  • Feiteng Long (3 collaborations)
  • Ruthie Pliskin (3 collaborations)

The research interests of Daan Scheepers are multifaceted and involve intersections between social behavioral science and neuroscience, with particular attention to the cultural, moral, and emotional dimensions of human psychology. Their work addresses a broad range of social phenomena, including intergroup relations, prejudice reduction interventions, experiences of flow, and the interface between physiological responses and psychological states.

Best Publications

  • Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior.

    A Dijksterhuis;Russell Spears;Tom Postmes;DA Stapel

  • When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups

    Daan Scheepers;Naomi Ellemers

  • Social identity theory

    Daan Scheepers;Naomi Ellemers

  • Diversity in in-group bias: Structural factors, situational features, and social functions

    Daan Scheepers;Russell Spears;Bertjan Doosje;Antony Stephen Reid Manstead

  • Task conflict, information processing, and decision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict

    Frank R.C. de Wit;Karen A. Jehn;Daan Scheepers

  • Turning social identity threat into challenge: Status stability and cardiovascular reactivity during inter-group competition

    Daan Scheepers

  • The attraction of social power: The influence of construing power as opportunity versus responsibility

    Kai Sassenberg;Naomi Ellemers;Daan Scheepers

  • Suffering from the possibility of status loss: Physiological responses to social identity threat in high status groups.

    Daan Scheepers;Naomi Ellemers;Nieska Sintemaartensdijk

  • Distinctiveness and Definition of Collective Self: A Tripartite Model

    Russell Spears;Jolanda Jetten;Daan Scheepers

  • Social power makes the heart work more efficiently: Evidence from cardiovascular markers of challenge and threat

    Daan Scheepers;Frank de Wit;Naomi Ellemers;Kai Sassenberg

  • The threat vs. challenge of car parking for women: How self- and group affirmation affect cardiovascular responses

    Belle Derks;Daan Scheepers;Colette Van Laar;Naomi Ellemers

  • If we have the will, there will be a way: regulatory focus as a group identity

    Krispijn Faddegon;Daan Scheepers;Naomi Ellemers

  • The social functions of ingroup bias: Creating, confirming, or changing social reality

    Daan Scheepers;Russell Spears;Bertjan Doosje;Antony S. R. Manstead

  • Two Functions of Verbal Intergroup Discrimination: Identity and Instrumental Motives as a Result of Group Identification and Threat

    Daan Scheepers;Russell Spears;Bertjan Doosje;Antony S. R. Manstead

  • Integrating Identity and Instrumental Approaches to Intergroup Differentiation: Different Contexts, Different Motives

    Daan Scheepers;Russell Spears;Bertjan Doosje;Antony S. R. Manstead

  • The cortisol response to anticipated intergroup interactions predicts self-reported prejudice.

    Erik Bijleveld;Daan Scheepers;Naomi Ellemers

  • Whether power holders construe their power as responsibility or opportunity influences their tendency to take advice from others

    Frank R.C. De Wit;Daan Scheepers;Naomi Ellemers;Kai Sassenberg

  • Interventions to reduce blatant and subtle sexual orientation- and gender identity prejudice (SOGIP): Current knowledge and future directions.

    F.M. Cramwinckel;D.T. Scheepers;J.M. van der Toorn;J.M. van der Toorn

  • The emergence and effects of deviants in low and high status groups

    Daan Scheepers;Nyla R Branscombe;Russell Spears;Bertjan Doosje

  • The threat of moral refusers for one's self-concept and the protective function of physical cleansing

    Florien M. Cramwinckel;Eric van Dijk;Daan Scheepers;Kees van den Bos

  • Neuroscience of prejudice and intergroup relations

    Belle Derks;Daan Scheepers;Naomi Ellemers

Frequent Co-Authors

Naomi Ellemers
Naomi Ellemers Utrecht University
Kai Sassenberg
Kai Sassenberg Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Russell Spears
Russell Spears University of Groningen
Belle Derks
Belle Derks University of Twente
Karen A. Jehn
Karen A. Jehn University of Melbourne
Bertjan Doosje
Bertjan Doosje University of Amsterdam
Manuela Barreto
Manuela Barreto University of Exeter
Eva Jonas
Eva Jonas University of Salzburg
Eric van Dijk
Eric van Dijk Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Psychology in the USA opens up a range of career options beyond traditional clinical roles. Many students pursue related fields such as counseling, social work, or advanced graduate programs. One popular pathway is becoming a Speech-Language Pathologist, a profession that blends psychology, communication sciences, and healthcare.

To become a speech-language pathologist, there are specific state certification requirements you’ll need to meet. For instance, you can review the Nevada speech pathologist certification requirements to understand the typical educational and supervised clinical experience needed. Likewise, those interested in working in the northeast can consult New Hampshire speech pathologist certification requirements for state-specific information.

Other states may have unique stipulations. For example, if you plan to work in New Jersey, you must be aware of the specific slp requirements in New Jersey. Similarly, you can review the New Mexico speech pathologist certification requirements to learn about qualifications in the Southwest. Exploring these pathways can help psychology graduates find fulfilling careers where they can make a difference.

Best Scientists Citing Daan Scheepers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles