World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael S. Scheeringa

Michael S. Scheeringa

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9699 9073 5120 4671 86 8804

Michael S. Scheeringa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael S. Scheeringa between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael S. Scheeringa published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2014. 6 of the 87 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2014. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1993 2025

87 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael S. Scheeringa: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 2
1995 2
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 0
2003 3
2004 3
2005 1
2006 2
2007 3
2008 5
2009 3
2010 1
2011 3
2012 2
2013 2
2014 7
2015 4
2016 3
2017 7
2018 5
2019 4
2020 3
2021 5
2022 4
2023 0
2024 4
2025 2
Total 87
Download as CSV

Michael S. Scheeringa publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Scheeringa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 86
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael S. Scheeringa D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Scheeringa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael S. Scheeringa is affiliated with Tulane University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, focusing on clinical psychology and related subfields. Their research spans various areas including general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, experimental and cognitive psychology, as well as developmental and educational psychology.

The central themes of their work include child abuse and trauma, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and posttraumatic stress disorder research. Additional topics of their research encompass migration, health and trauma, resilience and mental health, educational and psychological assessments, and broader mental health research topics.

Several recent papers authored or co-authored by Michael S. Scheeringa highlight the scope of their contributions:

  • Stepped Care Versus Standard Care for Children After Trauma: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial, 2022, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Reexamination of diathesis stress and neurotoxic stress theories: A qualitative review of pre-trauma neurobiology in relation to posttraumatic stress symptoms, 2020, International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
  • The Diagnostic Infant Preschool Assessment-Likert Version: Preparation, Concurrent Construct Validation, and Test-Retest Reliability, 2020, Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
  • Child and parent secondary outcomes in stepped care versus standard care treatment for childhood trauma, 2022, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Links Between Oppositional Defiant Disorder Dimensions, Psychophysiology, and Interpersonal versus Non-interpersonal Trauma, 2021, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Their collaborations include frequent co-authors such as Alison Salloum, Yuanyuan Lu, Henian Chen, Judith A. Cohen, and Kristen Salomon.

They have published predominantly in journals with a clinical focus, including:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
  • International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Michael S. Scheeringa's research integrates both theoretical and applied aspects within psychology, with a pronounced emphasis on childhood trauma and its psychological consequences. The body of work reflects ongoing efforts to understand and assess trauma-related conditions and interventions targeted for children and adolescents.

Best Publications

  • A relational perspective on PTSD in early childhood.

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Charles H. Zeanah

  • Two approaches to the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder in infancy and early childhood.

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Charles H. Zeanah;Martin J. Drell;Julie A. Larrieu

  • New findings on alternative criteria for PTSD in preschool children.

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Charles H. Zeanah;Leann Myers;Frank W. Putnam

  • Trauma‐focused cognitive‐behavioral therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in three‐through six year‐old children: a randomized clinical trial

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Carl F. Weems;Judith A. Cohen;Lisa Amaya-Jackson

  • Factors affecting the diagnosis and prediction of PTSD symptomatology in children and adolescents.

    M.P.H. Michael S. Scheeringa;Mary Jo Wright;M.P.H. John P. Hunt;Charles H. Zeanah

  • Reconsideration of harm's way: onsets and comorbidity patterns of disorders in preschool children and their caregivers following Hurricane Katrina

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Charles H. Zeanah

  • Reactive attachment disorder in maltreated toddlers.

    Charles H. Zeanah;Michael Scheeringa;N. W. Boris;Sherryl Scott Heller

  • Toward Establishing Procedural, Criterion, and Discriminant Validity for PTSD in Early Childhood

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Claire D. Peebles;Cynthia A. Cook;Charles H. Zeanah

  • Psychopharmacological Treatment for Very Young Children: Contexts and Guidelines

    Mary Margaret Gleason;Helen Link Egger;Graham J. Emslie;Laurence L. Greenhill

  • PTSD in children and adolescents: toward an empirically based algorithma

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Charles H. Zeanah;Judith A. Cohen

  • Predictive validity in a prospective follow-up of PTSD in preschool children.

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Charles H. Zeanah;Leann Myers;Frank W. Putnam

  • Symptom expression and trauma variables in children under 48 months of age

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Charles H. Zeanah

  • D-Cycloserine Augmentation of Exposure-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data.

    David Mataix-Cols;Lorena Fernández de la Cruz;Benedetta Monzani;David Rosenfield

  • Psychopathology in Infancy

    Charles H. Zeanah;Neil W. Boris;Michael S. Scheeringa

  • The Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment: A New Diagnostic Instrument for Young Children.

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Nancy Haslett

  • Attachment disorders in infancy and early childhood: A preliminary investigation of diagnostic criteria.

    Neil W. Boris;Charles H. Zeanah;Julie A. Larrieu;Michael S. Scheeringa

  • Research Diagnostic Criteria for Infants and Preschool Children: The Process and Empirical Support

    Michael Scheeringa

  • Post-traumatic stress disorder diagnosis in children: challenges and promises.

    Judith A. Cohen;Michael S. Scheeringa

  • Comparing criteria for attachment disorders: establishing reliability and validity in high-risk samples.

    Neil W. Boris;Sarah S. Hinshaw-Fuselier;Anna T. Smyke;Michael S. Scheeringa

  • Diagnosing PTSD in early childhood: an empirical assessment of four approaches.

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Leann Myers;Frank W. Putnam;Charles H. Zeanah

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles H. Zeanah
Charles H. Zeanah Tulane University
Carl F. Weems
Carl F. Weems Iowa State University
Judith A. Cohen
Judith A. Cohen Allegheny General Hospital
Eric A. Storch
Eric A. Storch Baylor College of Medicine
Frank W. Putnam
Frank W. Putnam University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Tanya K. Murphy
Tanya K. Murphy University of South Florida
Kathryn L. Humphreys
Kathryn L. Humphreys Vanderbilt University
Tim Dalgleish
Tim Dalgleish University of Cambridge
David F. Tolin
David F. Tolin Yale University
Lisa Amaya-Jackson
Lisa Amaya-Jackson Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens the door to diverse career options, from clinical work to research, counseling, and human resources. Flexibility in online learning makes it easier to balance studies with other commitments, and many universities with strong campus reputations now offer robust online options.

When choosing a program, consider the school’s reputation, regional accreditation, available concentrations, and career support services. Rankings can help guide your decision. For example, you can review the best psychology degree rankings in Charleston, the top psychology programs in Charlotte, and the best psychology degree rankings in Cleveland to find reputable programs in these regions. If you are looking out west, the best psychology degree programs ranking in Colorado highlights some leading options as well.

An online psychology degree can set you on multiple pathways, such as school counseling, mental health services, business, or further graduate study, making it a versatile choice for the future.

Best Scientists Citing Michael S. Scheeringa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles