World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 80 1460 1304 69 66 306 20864

Justin Kenardy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Justin Kenardy between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Justin Kenardy published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2012. 6 of the 339 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2012. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 5 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 9 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1983 2025

339 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Justin Kenardy: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 3
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 5
1991 1
1992 4
1993 6
1994 1
1995 3
1996 5
1997 4
1998 1
1999 4
2000 8
2001 7
2002 5
2003 12
2004 5
2005 6
2006 12
2007 16
2008 9
2009 5
2010 15
2011 22
2012 24
2013 23
2014 17
2015 13
2016 18
2017 11
2018 13
2019 21
2020 11
2021 6
2022 1
2023 9
2024 3
2025 3
Total 339
Download as CSV

Justin Kenardy publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin Kenardy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 306 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 306
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Justin Kenardy D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin Kenardy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120 80
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Justin Kenardy is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia and focuses on research intersecting Medicine, Psychology, and Health Professions. Their work spans key subfields including Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine.

The primary topics addressed in Kenardy's research cover a range of clinical and health concerns: infant development and preterm care, family and patient care in intensive care units, child abuse and trauma, intensive care unit cognitive disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder research, pediatric pain management techniques, and the quality of life of childhood cancer survivors.

Kenardy's recent scholarly output includes the following publications:

  • Social support and posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies (2021), Clinical Psychology Review
  • Australian guidelines for the prevention and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: Updates in the third edition (2021), Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
  • The Course of Posttraumatic Stress in Children: Examination of Symptom Trajectories and Predictive Factors Following Admission to Pediatric Intensive Care (2020), Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
  • Topical Review: Medical Trauma During Early Childhood (2021), Journal of Pediatric Psychology
  • Accuracy of delirium assessments in critically ill children: A prospective, observational study during routine care (2020), Australian Critical Care

The venues where Kenardy frequently publishes include:

  • Australian Critical Care
  • Clinical Psychology Review
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology
  • The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

Collaboration forms an important aspect of Kenardy's research. Frequent coauthors with multiple joint publications include Alexandra De Young, Belinda Dow, Debbie Long, Rebecca Paterson, and Erin Brown.

Best Publications

  • The Emotional Eating Scale: the development of a measure to assess coping with negative affect by eating

    Bruce Arnow;Justin Kenardy;W. Stewart Agras

  • Psychological interventions for overweight or obesity

    Shaw Ka;O'Rourke P;Del Mar C;Kenardy J

  • Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2010

    Geoff Boddice;Sandy Brauer;Louise Gustafsson

  • Sensory hypersensitivity occurs soon after whiplash injury and is associated with poor recovery

    Michele Sterling;Gwendolen A. Jull;Bill Vicenzino;Justin Kenardy

  • Development of motor system dysfunction following whiplash injury.

    Michele Sterling;Gwendolen Jull;Bill Vicenzino;Justin Kenardy

  • Physical and psychological factors predict outcome following whiplash injury.

    Michele Sterling;Gwendolen Jull;Bill Vicenzino;Justin Kenardy

  • A randomized controlled trial of online versus clinic-based CBT for adolescent anxiety.

    Susan Hilary Spence;Caroline Leanne Donovan;Sonja March;Amanda Gamble

  • Binge eating among the obese: a descriptive study.

    Bruce Arnow;Justin Kenardy;W. Stewart Agras

  • What's driving the binge in binge eating disorder?: A prospective examination of precursors and consequences†

    Richard I. Stein;Justin Kenardy;Claire V. Wiseman;Jennifer Zoler Dounchis

  • Physical and Psychological Factors Maintain Long-term Predictive Capacity Post-Whiplash Injury

    Michele Sterling;Gwendolen Jull;Justin A. Kenardy

  • Multiple session early psychological interventions for the prevention of post‐traumatic stress disorder

    Neil Patrick Roberts;Neil James Kitchiner;Justin Kenardy;Jonathan Ian Bisson

  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Multiple-Session Early Interventions Following Traumatic Events

    Neil Patrick Roberts;Neil James Kitchiner;Justin Kenardy;Jonathan Ian Bisson

  • Performance anxiety, social phobia, and setting effects in instrumental music students

    Wendy J. Cox;Justin Kenardy

  • Stress debriefing and patterns of recovery following a natural disaster

    Justin A. Kenardy;Rosemary A. Webster;Terry J. Lewin;Vaughan J. Carr

  • Comparison of palmtop-computer-assisted brief cognitive-behavioral treatment to cognitive-behavioral treatment for panic disorder

    Michelle G. Newman;Justin Kenardy;Steve Herman;Steve Herman;C. Barr Taylor

  • Trauma in Early Childhood: A Neglected Population.

    Alexandra C. De Young;Alexandra C. De Young;Justin A. Kenardy;Justin A. Kenardy;Vanessa E. Cobham

  • Group cognitive-behavioral treatment for the nonpurging bulimic: an initial evaluation.

    Christy F. Telch;W. Stewart Agras;Elise M. Rossiter;Denise Wilfley

  • Does the presence of sensory hypersensitivity influence outcomes of physical rehabilitation for chronic whiplash? A preliminary RCT

    Gwendolen A. Jull;Michele M. Sterling;Justin A. Kenardy;Elaine Beller

  • Early psychological interventions to treat acute traumatic stress symptoms

    Neil Patrick Roberts;Neil James Kitchiner;Justin Kenardy;Jonathan Ian Bisson

  • The development of psychological changes following whiplash injury.

    Michele Sterling;Justin Kenardy;Gwendolen Jull;Bill Vicenzino

  • Physical therapist‐delivered pain coping skills training and exercise for knee osteoarthritis: Randomized controlled trial

    Kim L Bennell;Yasmin Ahamed;Gwendolen Jull;Christina Bryant

Frequent Co-Authors

Sonja March
Sonja March University of Southern Queensland
Gwendolen Jull
Gwendolen Jull University of Queensland
Susan H. Spence
Susan H. Spence Griffith University
Vicki Anderson
Vicki Anderson Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Tian P. S. Oei
Tian P. S. Oei University of Queensland
Vanessa E. Cobham
Vanessa E. Cobham University of Queensland
C. Barr Taylor
C. Barr Taylor Stanford University
Caroline L. Donovan
Caroline L. Donovan Griffith University
Markus A. Landolt
Markus A. Landolt University of Zurich
Michael K. Nicholas
Michael K. Nicholas University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Psychology in the USA, there are various online degree options and career pathways to consider—especially in counseling. Online degrees can provide a flexible, accelerated route into rewarding fields like counseling, social work, or mental health services.

Many states offer streamlined, accredited counseling programs designed to help you launch your career quickly. For example, the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Nebraska highlights fast-track programs and key requirements in that state. Similarly, if you’re interested in west coast opportunities, you might look into Nevada fastest counseling programs, which emphasize online coursework and streamlined licensure.

For those on the east coast, explore options such as the fastest way to become a counselor in New Hampshire or the fastest way to become a counselor in New Jersey. Each state has its own specific prerequisites and timelines, so it’s important to examine your local requirements before enrolling.

Pursuing an online psychology or counseling degree offers flexible learning and clear pathways to professional roles, making it possible to balance studies with your work or personal life.

Best Scientists Citing Justin Kenardy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles